Charles T Taylor1, Karalani Cross2, Nader Amir3. 1. University of California, San Diego, Department of Psychiatry, 8939 Villa La Jolla Drive, Suite 200, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA. Electronic address: c1taylor@ucsd.edu. 2. University of California, San Diego, Department of Psychiatry, 8939 Villa La Jolla Drive, Suite 200, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA. 3. University of California, San Diego, Department of Psychiatry, 8939 Villa La Jolla Drive, Suite 200, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA; San Diego State University, Department of Psychology, 6386 Alvarado Court, Suite 301, San Diego, CA 92120-4913, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Social anxiety is characterized by biased attentional processing of social information. However, heterogeneity of extant findings suggests that it may be informative to elucidate individual difference factors that modulate the processing of emotional information. The current study examined whether individual differences in components of attentional control (AC--shifting and focusing) moderated the link between social anxiety and attentional engagement and disengagement biases for threat-relevant cues. METHODS: Seventy-five undergraduate students completed well-established measures of social anxiety symptoms, AC, and attentional bias for social threat information (modified probe detection task). RESULTS: Moderation analyses revealed that at low levels of AC-shifting, increased social anxiety was associated with slower disengagement from threat-relevant compared to neutral social cues. In contrast, at high levels of AC-shifting, social anxiety was associated with faster disengagement from threat-relevant compared to neutral stimuli. Individual differences in AC-focusing did not moderate the social anxiety-attentional bias link. LIMITATIONS: Causal inferences cannot be made given the cross-sectional study design. The sample comprised individuals displaying a range of self-reported social anxiety symptoms; thus, generalizability to clinical samples remains to be established. The measurement of AC relied on subjective participant report. CONCLUSIONS: The current findings underscore the importance of AC processes in understanding the nature of attentional bias mechanisms in anxiety.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:Social anxiety is characterized by biased attentional processing of social information. However, heterogeneity of extant findings suggests that it may be informative to elucidate individual difference factors that modulate the processing of emotional information. The current study examined whether individual differences in components of attentional control (AC--shifting and focusing) moderated the link between social anxiety and attentional engagement and disengagement biases for threat-relevant cues. METHODS: Seventy-five undergraduate students completed well-established measures of social anxiety symptoms, AC, and attentional bias for social threat information (modified probe detection task). RESULTS: Moderation analyses revealed that at low levels of AC-shifting, increased social anxiety was associated with slower disengagement from threat-relevant compared to neutral social cues. In contrast, at high levels of AC-shifting, social anxiety was associated with faster disengagement from threat-relevant compared to neutral stimuli. Individual differences in AC-focusing did not moderate the social anxiety-attentional bias link. LIMITATIONS: Causal inferences cannot be made given the cross-sectional study design. The sample comprised individuals displaying a range of self-reported social anxiety symptoms; thus, generalizability to clinical samples remains to be established. The measurement of AC relied on subjective participant report. CONCLUSIONS: The current findings underscore the importance of AC processes in understanding the nature of attentional bias mechanisms in anxiety.
Authors: Kevin G Saulnier; Nicholas P Allan; Matt R Judah; Brandon Koscinski; Nathan M Hager; Brian Albanese; Ashley A Knapp; Norman B Schmidt Journal: Cognit Ther Res Date: 2021-04-15
Authors: Joseph W Fredrick; Stephen P Becker; Michael J Kofler; Matthew A Jarrett; G Leonard Burns; Aaron M Luebbe Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2020-08-27 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Alexandre Heeren; Joël Billieux; Pierre Philippot; Rudi De Raedt; Chris Baeken; Philippe de Timary; Pierre Maurage; Marie-Anne Vanderhasselt Journal: Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 3.436