Literature DB >> 26071941

Defining Disease Severity in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Current and Future Directions.

Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet1, Julián Panés2, William J Sandborn3, Séverine Vermeire4, Silvio Danese5, Brian G Feagan6, Jean-Frédéric Colombel7, Stephen B Hanauer8, Beth Rycroft9.   

Abstract

Although most treatment algorithms in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) begin with classifying patients according to disease severity, no formal validated or consensus definitions of mild, moderate, or severe IBD currently exist. There are 3 main domains relevant to the evaluation of disease severity in IBD: impact of the disease on the patient, disease burden, and disease course. These measures are not mutually exclusive and the correlations and interactions between them are not necessarily proportionate. A comprehensive literature search was performed regarding current definitions of disease severity in both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, and the ability to categorize disease severity in a particular patient. Although numerous assessment tools for symptoms, quality of life, patient-reported outcomes, fatigue, endoscopy, cross-sectional imaging, and histology (in ulcerative colitis) were identified, few have validated thresholds for categorizing disease activity or severity. Moving forward, we propose a preliminary set of criteria that could be used to classify IBD disease severity. These are grouped by the 3 domains of disease severity: impact of the disease on the patient (clinical symptoms, quality of life, fatigue, and disability); measurable inflammatory burden (C-reactive protein, mucosal lesions, upper gastrointestinal involvement, and disease extent), and disease course (including structural damage, history/extension of intestinal resection, perianal disease, number of flares, and extraintestinal manifestations). We further suggest that a disease severity classification should be developed and validated by an international group to develop a pragmatic means of identifying patients with severe disease. This is increasingly important to guide current therapeutic strategies for IBD and to develop treatment algorithms for clinical practice.
Copyright © 2016 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Disease Course; Disease Severity; Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26071941     DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  89 in total

1.  Efficacy and safety of simultaneous treatment with two biologic medications in refractory Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Edward Yang; Nicola Panaccione; Natalie Whitmire; Parambir S Dulai; Niels Vande Casteele; Siddharth Singh; Brigid S Boland; Angelina Collins; William J Sandborn; Remo Panaccione; Robert Battat
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 8.171

2.  Prognostic tools for identification of high risk in people with Crohn's disease: systematic review and cost-effectiveness study.

Authors:  Steven J Edwards; Samantha Barton; Mariana Bacelar; Charlotta Karner; Peter Cain; Victoria Wakefield; Gemma Marceniuk
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 4.014

3.  A watchful waiting approach for newly diagnosed Crohn's disease patients with an inflammatory phenotype.

Authors:  Sharif Yassin; Naomi Fliss Isakov; Yulia Ron; Nathaniel Aviv Cohen; Ayal Hirsch; Nitsan Maharshak
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Validity of the EQ-5D-5L and EQ-5D-3L in patients with Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Fanni Rencz; Peter L Lakatos; László Gulácsi; Valentin Brodszky; Zsuzsanna Kürti; Szilvia Lovas; János Banai; László Herszényi; Tamás Cserni; Tamás Molnár; Márta Péntek; Károly Palatka
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  The new simplified MARIA score applies beyond clinical trials: A suitable clinical practice tool for Crohn's disease that parallels a simple endoscopic index and fecal calprotectin.

Authors:  Joana Roseira; Ana Rita Ventosa; Helena Tavares de Sousa; Jorge Brito
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 6.  British Society of Gastroenterology consensus guidelines on the management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults.

Authors:  Christopher Andrew Lamb; Nicholas A Kennedy; Tim Raine; Philip Anthony Hendy; Philip J Smith; Jimmy K Limdi; Bu'Hussain Hayee; Miranda C E Lomer; Gareth C Parkes; Christian Selinger; Kevin J Barrett; R Justin Davies; Cathy Bennett; Stuart Gittens; Malcolm G Dunlop; Omar Faiz; Aileen Fraser; Vikki Garrick; Paul D Johnston; Miles Parkes; Jeremy Sanderson; Helen Terry; Daniel R Gaya; Tariq H Iqbal; Stuart A Taylor; Melissa Smith; Matthew Brookes; Richard Hansen; A Barney Hawthorne
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Severe ulcerative colitis: predictors of response and algorithm proposal for rescue therapy.

Authors:  D G Ribaldone; I Dileo; R Pellicano; A Resegotti; S Fagoonee; M Vernero; G Saracco; M Astegiano
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 8.  Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Giulia Roda; Siew Chien Ng; Paulo Gustavo Kotze; Marjorie Argollo; Remo Panaccione; Antonino Spinelli; Arthur Kaser; Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet; Silvio Danese
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 52.329

Review 9.  Approach to the Patient with Mild Crohn's Disease: a 2016 Update.

Authors:  Frank I Scott; Gary R Lichtenstein
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2016-09

Review 10.  Unmet Needs in IBD: the Case of Fatigue.

Authors:  Pieter Hindryckx; Debby Laukens; Ferdinando D'Amico; Silvio Danese
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 8.667

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.