Literature DB >> 26071226

Perfect error processing: Perfectionism-related variations in action monitoring and error processing mechanisms.

Jutta Stahl1, Manuela Acharki2, Miriam Kresimon2, Frederike Völler2, Henning Gibbons3.   

Abstract

Showing excellent performance and avoiding poor performance are the main characteristics of perfectionists. Perfectionism-related variations (N=94) in neural correlates of performance monitoring were investigated in a flanker task by assessing two perfectionism-related trait dimensions: Personal standard perfectionism (PSP), reflecting intrinsic motivation to show error-free performance, and evaluative concern perfectionism (ECP), representing the worry of being poorly evaluated based on bad performance. A moderating effect of ECP and PSP on error processing - an important performance monitoring system - was investigated by examining the error (-related) negativity (Ne/ERN) and the error positivity (Pe). The smallest Ne/ERN difference (error-correct) was obtained for pure-ECP participants (high-ECP-low-PSP), whereas the highest difference was shown for those with high-ECP-high-PSP (i.e., mixed perfectionists). Pe was positively correlated with PSP only. Our results encouraged the cognitive-bias hypothesis suggesting that pure-ECP participants reduce response-related attention to avoid intense error processing by minimising the subjective threat of negative evaluations. The PSP-related variations in late error processing are consistent with the participants' high in PSP goal-oriented tendency to optimise their behaviour.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Action monitoring; Error processing; Event-related potentials; Individual differences; Perfectionism

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26071226     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  13 in total

1.  Motivational processes from expectancy-value theory are associated with variability in the error positivity in young children.

Authors:  Matthew H Kim; Loren M Marulis; Jennie K Grammer; Frederick J Morrison; William J Gehring
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2016-11-26

2.  A brief, computerized intervention targeting error sensitivity reduces the error-related negativity.

Authors:  Alexandria Meyer; Brittany Gibby; Karl Wissemann; Julia Klawohn; Greg Hajcak; Norman B Schmidt
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  The Overcontrol in Youth Checklist (OCYC): Behavioral and Neural Validation of a Parent-Report of Child Overcontrol in Early Childhood.

Authors:  Kirsten Gilbert; Deanna M Barch; Joan L Luby
Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev       Date:  2020-02

4.  The influence of error detection and error significance on neural and behavioral correlates of error processing in a complex choice task.

Authors:  Elisa Porth; André Mattes; Jutta Stahl
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 3.526

5.  The Nature of the Relationship between Anxiety and the Error-Related Negativity across Development.

Authors:  Jason S Moser
Journal:  Curr Behav Neurosci Rep       Date:  2017-09-30

6.  How personal standards perfectionism and evaluative concerns perfectionism affect the error positivity and post-error behavior with varying stimulus visibility.

Authors:  Jessica Drizinsky; Joachim Zülch; Henning Gibbons; Jutta Stahl
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  To err is (perfectly) human: behavioural and neural correlates of error processing and perfectionism.

Authors:  Antonia Barke; Stefan Bode; Peter Dechent; Carsten Schmidt-Samoa; Christina Van Heer; Jutta Stahl
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Preserved performance monitoring and error detection in left hemisphere stroke.

Authors:  Eva Niessen; Jana M Ant; Stefan Bode; Jochen Saliger; Hans Karbe; Gereon R Fink; Jutta Stahl; Peter H Weiss
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 4.881

9.  Unlocking Neurocognitive Substrates of Late-Life Affective Symptoms Using the Research Domain Criteria: Worry Is an Essential Dimension.

Authors:  Sherry A Beaudreau; Nathan C Hantke; Nehjla Mashal; Christine E Gould; Victor W Henderson; Ruth O'Hara
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 5.750

10.  Differentiating electrophysiological indices of internal and external performance monitoring: Relationship with perfectionism and locus of control.

Authors:  Alexandra M Muir; Kaylie A Carbine; Jayden Goodwin; Ariana Hedges-Muncy; Tanja Endrass; Michael J Larson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.