Literature DB >> 26070895

Conversion of Mountain Beech Coppices into High Forest: An Example for Ecological Intensification.

Walter Mattioli1, Barbara Ferrari2, Diego Giuliarelli3, Leone Davide Mancini4, Luigi Portoghesi5, Piermaria Corona6.   

Abstract

Converting beech coppices into high forest stands has been promoted in the last decades as a management goal to attenuate the negative effects that frequent clearcutting may have on soil, landscape, and biodiversity conservation. The silvicultural tool usually adopted is the gradual thinning of shoots during the long span of time required to complete the conversion, that also allows the owner to keep harvesting some wood. This research reports and discusses, in the light of the ecological intensification approach, the results achieved from an experimental test started more than 25 years ago in a 42-year-old beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) coppice with standards in central Italy. The effects of various thinning intensities (three treatments plus a control) on the stand growth and structure are assessed by successive forest inventories. Analyses are integrated by spatial indices to assess stem density and canopy cover. Converting beech coppices into high forest through gradual thinning of shoots proves to be an effective step down the road to silvicultural systems characterized by continuous forest cover, as a tool of ecological intensification suitable to guarantee both public and private interests. Thinning has led to stands with fewer but larger stems, thus accelerating the long conversion process while maintaining both wood harvesting capability and environmental services.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Continuous cover; Coppice with standards; Fagus sylvatica; Italy; Thinning

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26070895     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-015-0549-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  4 in total

1.  Solutions for a cultivated planet.

Authors:  Jonathan A Foley; Navin Ramankutty; Kate A Brauman; Emily S Cassidy; James S Gerber; Matt Johnston; Nathaniel D Mueller; Christine O'Connell; Deepak K Ray; Paul C West; Christian Balzer; Elena M Bennett; Stephen R Carpenter; Jason Hill; Chad Monfreda; Stephen Polasky; Johan Rockström; John Sheehan; Stefan Siebert; David Tilman; David P M Zaks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties.

Authors:  P A Matson; W J Parton; A G Power; M J Swift
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-07-25       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Ecological intensification: harnessing ecosystem services for food security.

Authors:  Riccardo Bommarco; David Kleijn; Simon G Potts
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Coppice abandonment and its implications for species diversity in forest vegetation.

Authors:  Jana Müllerová; Radim Hédl; Péter Szabó
Journal:  For Ecol Manage       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 3.558

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Reconciling Environment and Production in Managed Ecosystems: Is Ecological Intensification a Solution?

Authors:  Thomas Cordonnier; Jean-Luc Peyron
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 3.266

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.