Literature DB >> 26070707

Prognostic models in obstetrics: available, but far from applicable.

C Emily Kleinrouweler1, Fiona M Cheong-See2, Gary S Collins3, Anneke Kwee4, Shakila Thangaratinam5, Khalid S Khan5, Ben Willem J Mol6, Eva Pajkrt6, Karel G M Moons7, Ewoud Schuit8.   

Abstract

Health care provision is increasingly focused on the prediction of patients' individual risk for developing a particular health outcome in planning further tests and treatments. There has been a steady increase in the development and publication of prognostic models for various maternal and fetal outcomes in obstetrics. We undertook a systematic review to give an overview of the current status of available prognostic models in obstetrics in the context of their potential advantages and the process of developing and validating models. Important aspects to consider when assessing a prognostic model are discussed and recommendations on how to proceed on this within the obstetric domain are given. We searched MEDLINE (up to July 2012) for articles developing prognostic models in obstetrics. We identified 177 papers that reported the development of 263 prognostic models for 40 different outcomes. The most frequently predicted outcomes were preeclampsia (n = 69), preterm delivery (n = 63), mode of delivery (n = 22), gestational hypertension (n = 11), and small-for-gestational-age infants (n = 10). The performance of newer models was generally not better than that of older models predicting the same outcome. The most important measures of predictive accuracy (ie, a model's discrimination and calibration) were often (82.9%, 218/263) not both assessed. Very few developed models were validated in data other than the development data (8.7%, 23/263). Only two-thirds of the papers (62.4%, 164/263) presented the model such that validation in other populations was possible, and the clinical applicability was discussed in only 11.0% (29/263). The impact of developed models on clinical practice was unknown. We identified a large number of prognostic models in obstetrics, but there is relatively little evidence about their performance, impact, and usefulness in clinical practice so that at this point, clinical implementation cannot be recommended. New efforts should be directed toward evaluating the performance and impact of the existing models.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  model; obstetrics; prediction; pregnancy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26070707     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.06.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  38 in total

1.  Early pregnancy prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus risk using prenatal screening biomarkers in nulliparous women.

Authors:  Brittney M Snyder; Rebecca J Baer; Scott P Oltman; Jennifer G Robinson; Patrick J Breheny; Audrey F Saftlas; Wei Bao; Andrea L Greiner; Knute D Carter; Larry Rand; Laura L Jelliffe-Pawlowski; Kelli K Ryckman
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 5.602

2.  Longitudinally Tracking Maternal Autonomic Modulation During Normal Pregnancy With Comprehensive Heart Rate Variability Analyses.

Authors:  Maretha Bester; Rohan Joshi; Massimo Mischi; Judith O E H van Laar; Rik Vullings
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  Patient and provider perspectives on preterm birth risk assessment and communication.

Authors:  Martha A Tesfalul; Sky K Feuer; Esperanza Castillo; Kimberly Coleman-Phox; Allison O'Leary; Miriam Kuppermann
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2021-04-01

4.  Validation and development of models using clinical, biochemical and ultrasound markers for predicting pre-eclampsia: an individual participant data meta-analysis.

Authors:  John Allotey; Kym Ie Snell; Melanie Smuk; Richard Hooper; Claire L Chan; Asif Ahmed; Lucy C Chappell; Peter von Dadelszen; Julie Dodds; Marcus Green; Louise Kenny; Asma Khalil; Khalid S Khan; Ben W Mol; Jenny Myers; Lucilla Poston; Basky Thilaganathan; Anne C Staff; Gordon Cs Smith; Wessel Ganzevoort; Hannele Laivuori; Anthony O Odibo; Javier A Ramírez; John Kingdom; George Daskalakis; Diane Farrar; Ahmet A Baschat; Paul T Seed; Federico Prefumo; Fabricio da Silva Costa; Henk Groen; Francois Audibert; Jacques Masse; Ragnhild B Skråstad; Kjell Å Salvesen; Camilla Haavaldsen; Chie Nagata; Alice R Rumbold; Seppo Heinonen; Lisa M Askie; Luc Jm Smits; Christina A Vinter; Per M Magnus; Kajantie Eero; Pia M Villa; Anne K Jenum; Louise B Andersen; Jane E Norman; Akihide Ohkuchi; Anne Eskild; Sohinee Bhattacharya; Fionnuala M McAuliffe; Alberto Galindo; Ignacio Herraiz; Lionel Carbillon; Kerstin Klipstein-Grobusch; SeonAe Yeo; Helena J Teede; Joyce L Browne; Karel Gm Moons; Richard D Riley; Shakila Thangaratinam
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 4.014

5.  Perspectives, preferences and needs regarding early prediction of preeclampsia in Dutch pregnant women: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Neeltje M T H Crombag; Marije Lamain-de Ruiter; Anneke Kwee; Peter C J I Schielen; Jozien M Bensing; Gerard H A Visser; Arie Franx; Maria P H Koster
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 6.  Prevention of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: a Novel Application of the Polypill Concept.

Authors:  J L Browne; K Klipstein-Grobusch; A Franx; D E Grobbee
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Antenatal blood pressure for prediction of pre-eclampsia, preterm birth, and small for gestational age babies: development and validation in two general population cohorts.

Authors:  Corrie Macdonald-Wallis; Richard J Silverwood; Bianca L de Stavola; Hazel Inskip; Cyrus Cooper; Keith M Godfrey; Sarah Crozier; Abigail Fraser; Scott M Nelson; Debbie A Lawlor; Kate Tilling
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-11-17

Review 8.  A systematic review of neonatal treatment intensity scores and their potential application in low-resource setting hospitals for predicting mortality, morbidity and estimating resource use.

Authors:  Jalemba Aluvaala; Gary S Collins; Michuki Maina; James A Berkley; Mike English
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2017-12-07

9.  Early warning scores for detecting deterioration in adult hospital patients: a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Stephen Gerry; Jacqueline Birks; Timothy Bonnici; Peter J Watkinson; Shona Kirtley; Gary S Collins
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-12-03       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  External Validation Study of First Trimester Obstetric Prediction Models (Expect Study I): Research Protocol and Population Characteristics.

Authors:  Linda Jacqueline Elisabeth Meertens; Hubertina Cj Scheepers; Raymond G De Vries; Carmen D Dirksen; Irene Korstjens; Antonius Lm Mulder; Marianne J Nieuwenhuijze; Jan G Nijhuis; Marc Ea Spaanderman; Luc Jm Smits
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2017-10-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.