| Literature DB >> 26070033 |
Anita Thakur1, Md Jahangir Alam2, M R Ajayakumar3, Saroj Ghaskadbi4, Manish Sharma5, Shyamal K Goswami6.
Abstract
Despite recent advances, the role of ROS in mediating hypertrophic and apoptotic responses in cardiac myocytes elicited by norepinephrine (NE) is rather poorly understood. We demonstrate through our experiments that H9c2 cardiac myoblasts treated with 2 µM NE (hypertrophic dose) generate DCFH-DA positive ROS only for 2h; while those treated with 100 µM NE (apoptotic dose) sustains generation for 48 h, followed by apoptosis. Though the levels of DCFH fluorescence were comparable at early time points in the two treatment sets, its quenching by DPI, catalase and MnTmPyP suggested the existence of a different repertoire of ROS. Both doses of NE also induced moderate levels of H2O2 but with different kinetics. Sustained but intermittent generation of highly reactive species detectable by HPF was seen in both treatment sets but no peroxynitrite was generated in either conditions. Sustained generation of hydroxyl radicals with no appreciable differences were noticed in both treatment sets. Nevertheless, despite similar profile of ROS generation between the two conditions, extensive DNA damage as evident from the increase in 8-OH-dG content, formation of γ-H2AX and PARP cleavage was seen only in cells treated with the higher dose of NE. We therefore conclude that hypertrophic and apoptotic doses of NE generate distinct but comparable repertoire of ROS/RNS leading to two very distinct downstream responses.Entities:
Keywords: 8−OH-dG; Apoptosis; Cardiac myocyte; Hypertrophy; Reactive oxygen species; Redox signaling
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26070033 PMCID: PMC4477046 DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2015.05.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Redox Biol ISSN: 2213-2317 Impact factor: 11.799
Fig. 1Different repertoire of DCFH-DA sensitive ROS is generated by two doses of NE. (A) H9c2 cells were treated with 2 and 100 µM NE and generation of ROS was monitored by adding 5 µM DCFH-DA 20 min prior to imaging at different time points as marked on each panel. Relative fluorescence intensity for each image is shown in the lower panel. (B) Following treatment with 2 and 100 µM NE, inhibitors of ROS generation viz., DPI (5 µM; inhibitor of flavoenzymes), PEG-catalase (100 µg/ml, quencher of H2O2), and MnTMPyP (50 µM; an SOD mimetic) were added either after 20 min (1 h readout) or 80 min (2 h readout). DCFHDA (5 µM) was added 20 min prior to imaging. (C) Following treatments with 2 and 100 µM NE for various durations, culture supernatants were removed and generation of hydrogen peroxide was estimated by Amplex red assay. (D) H9c2 cells were incubated with superoxide specific probe DHE (10 µM) with or without the SOD mimetic MnTmPyP (50 µM) and 20 min after, cells were also treated with 2 and 100 µM NE, followed by fluorescence imaging at indicated time points (left panel). Relative fluorescence intensity for each image is shown in the right panel. Data are expressed as the mean±SEM of three independent experiments performed in duplicate. *P≤0.05: control vs 2 µM NE; **P≤0.01: control vs 2 µM NE; ***P≤0.001: control vs 2 µM NE; #P≤0.05: control vs 100 µM NE; ##P≤0.01: control vs 100 µM NE and ###P≤0.001: control vs 100 µM NE; $P≤0.05: control vs 100 µM NE; $$P≤0.01: control vs 100 µM NE and $$$P≤0.001: control vs 100 µM NE; NS: not significant P value.
Fig. 2Different kinetics of HPF sensitive ROS generation by two different doses of NE. (A) H9c2 cells were treated with 2 and 100 µM of NE for the indicated time period. Highly reactive species sensitive fluoroprobe HPF (10 µM) was added half an hour prior to fluorescence imaging. Relative fluorescence intensity in each image is shown below. (B) H9c2 cells were treated with 2 and 100 µM NE for various time periods and assayed for the generation of hydroxyl radical. To validate the assay, cells treated with CuSO4/l-ascorbate were used as positive control. (C) H9c2 cells were treated with 2 and 100 µM NE for the indicated time and 5 min prior to imaging cells were also treated with the peroxynitrite specific probe PF1 (5 µM). Lower panel shows relative intensity of images shown in each panel. (D) H9c2 cells were treated with 2 and 100 µM of NE for the indicated time period. Cells were also treated with hydroxyl radical scavenger DMSO (75 mM) and nitric oxide scavenger cPTIO (50 µM) 2.5 h and 0.5 h prior to imaging while fluoroprobe HPF (10 µM) was added half an hour prior to imaging. Data are expressed as the mean±SEM of three independent experiments performed in duplicate. *P≤0.05: control vs 2 µM NE; **P≤0.01: control vs 2 µM NE; ***P≤0.001: control vs 2 µM NE; #P≤0.05: control vs 100 µM NE; ##P≤0.01: control vs 100 µM NE and ###P≤0.001: control vs 100 µM NE; NS: not significant P value.
Fig. 3Oxidative DNA damage and apoptosis occurs only in cells treated with 100 µM NE. (A) H9c2 cells were treated with 2 and 100 µM of NE and cells were harvested and analyzed for oxidative DNA damage and apoptosis measuring cleaved PARP (Asp214) and phosphorylated H2AX at serine (S139) (upper panel). Fold changes in mean fluorescent intensity is shown in the lower panel. (B) H9c2 myoblasts were treated with 2 and 100 µM NE. Cells were harvested at various time points, genomic DNA was isolated and then assayed for 8-OH-dG by competitive ELISA using monoclonal antibody specific for 8-OH-dG (33). Data represented ±standard error mean of three independent experiments.
Fig. 4Higher dose of NE decreases catalase but increases SOD activity. (A) After NE treatment, cells were harvested and (A) catalase activity was assayed as described in “methods section”. Activity was expressed as mU/mg of protein. Data are expressed as the mean±SEM of three independent experiments performed in duplicate. *P≤0.05: control vs 2 µM NE; ###P≤0.001: 2 µM NE vs 100 µM NE. (B) SOD activity was assayed as described in “methods section”. Activity was expressed as percentage of inhibition of autoxidation of pyrogallol. Data are expressed as the mean±SEM of three independent experiments performed in duplicate. *P≤0.05: control vs 2 µM NE; ***P≤0.001: 100 µM NE; ###P≤0.001: 2 µM NE vs 100 µM NE.