Literature DB >> 26069935

The risky business of being an entomologist: A systematic review.

Jessica Stanhope1, Scott Carver1, Philip Weinstein2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adverse work-related health outcomes are a significant problem worldwide. Entomologists, including arthropod breeders, are a unique occupational group exposed to potentially harmful arthropods, pesticides, and other more generic hazards. These exposures may place them at risk of a range of adverse work-related health outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: To determine what adverse work-related health outcomes entomologists have experienced, the incidence/prevalence of these outcomes, and what occupational management strategies have been employed by entomologists, and their effectiveness.
METHODS: A systematic search of eight databases was undertaken to identify studies informing the review objectives. Data pertaining to country, year, design, work-exposure, adverse work-related health outcomes, incidence/prevalence of these outcomes, and occupational management strategies were extracted, and reported descriptively. DISCUSSION: Results showed entomologists experienced work-related allergies, venom reactions, infections, infestations and delusional parasitosis. These related to exposure to insects, arachnids, chilopods and entognathans, and non-arthropod exposures, e.g. arthropod feed. Few studies reported the incidence/prevalence of such conditions, or work-related management strategies utilised by entomologists. There were no studies that specifically investigated the effectiveness of potential management strategies for entomologists as a population. Indeed, critical appraisal analysis indicated poor research quality in this area, which is a significant research gap.
CONCLUSIONS: Entomologists are a diverse, unique occupational group, at risk of a range of adverse work-related health outcomes. This study represents the first systematic review of their work-related health risks. Future studies investigating the prevalence of adverse work-related health outcomes for entomologists, and the effectiveness of management strategies are warranted to decrease the disease burden of this otherwise understudied group.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allergy; Arthropod; Entomologist; Health; Review

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26069935     DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.05.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  4 in total

Review 1.  Allergens from Edible Insects: Cross-reactivity and Effects of Processing.

Authors:  Laura De Marchi; Andrea Wangorsch; Gianni Zoccatelli
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 4.806

2.  Sensitisation to Imbrasia belina (mopane worm) and other local allergens in rural Gwanda district of Zimbabwe.

Authors:  Vuyelwa Ndlovu; Moses Chimbari; Pisirai Ndarukwa; Elopy Sibanda
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 3.406

3.  Delusional Infestation.

Authors:  Kevin B Laupland; Louis Valiquette
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 2.471

4.  A feasibility study to assess Imbrasia belina (mopane worm) sensitisation and related respiratory health outcomes in a rural community in Gwanda district, Zimbabwe.

Authors:  Vuyelwa Ndlovu; Moses Chimbari; Elopy Sibanda; Pisirai Ndarukwa
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2021-02-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.