| Literature DB >> 26069869 |
João Chambel1, Vera Severiano1, Teresa Baptista1, Susana Mendes1, Rui Pedrosa1.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of stocking density (0.5, 1, 2 and 3 fishL(-1)) and commercial marine fish diets (diet A, B, C and D) over four months on specific growth rate, condition factor, percentage without anomalous pigmentation (partial or total lack of white bands -miss-band) and survival of juvenile Amphiprion percula. Results showed that at 0.5 fishL(-1) densities induced the best survival (100%) and also the maximum percentage of fish without miss-band (58.33 +/-4.417%). The maximum SGR was obtained for the 0.5 fishL(-1) (0.459 ± 0.023% cm/day). However, the best condition factor (2.53 +/- 0.27) was achieved for 2 fishL(-1) densities. There were no significant differences in survival (68.9 to 84.5%), fish without miss-bands (18.03 to 26.92%) and condition factor (1.92 to 2.1) among diets during the experimental period. On the other hand, diet C (with 41% crude protein) supported the best SGR (0.485 ± 0.001% cmday(-1)). The results suggested that stocking density are critical and more relevant when compared with the different diet tested, namely on specific growth rate, condition factor, the miss-band and survival of juvenile percula clownfish. This study has particular significance with regards to anemonefishes husbandry in terms of survival and production efficiency.Entities:
Keywords: Amphiprion percula; Anemonefishes; Nutrition; Ornamental fish; Stocking density
Year: 2015 PMID: 26069869 PMCID: PMC4456576 DOI: 10.1186/s40064-015-0967-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Springerplus ISSN: 2193-1801
Diets composition expressed as a percentage of dry weight
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude protein | 52,5 | 48,0 | 41,1 | 38,1 |
| Crude fat | 8,1 | 8,0 | 9,0 | 9,7 |
| Moisture | 5,1 | 10,0 | 14,5 | 14,5 |
| Fibre | 3,5 | 4,0,2,4 | 2,8 | |
| Nitrogen-free extract | 24,3 | 12,0 | 22,5 | 24,4 |
| Ash | 6,5 | 18,0 | 10,5 | 10,5 |
| Gross energy (MJkg-1) | 19,8 | 16,6 | 17,1 | 17,0 |
| Gross energy (kcalkg-1) | 4723,7 | 3956,5 | 4091,5 | 4066,0 |
| P⁄E (g protein MJ-1GE) | 26,5 | 29,0 | 24,0 | 22,4 |
| P⁄E (mg protein kcal-1GE) | 111,1 | 121,3 | 100,5 | 93,7 |
Figure 1Effect of different diets composition on survival (A), specific growth rate (B), condition factor (C) and fish without miss-bands (D). Values are expressed by means of mean ± SEM (n = 3). Lowercase represents significant statistical differences at level p < 0.05: (a) between diet C and other diets; (b) between diet A and diets B and C.
Figure 2Effect of different stocking density on survival (A), specific growth rate (B), condition factor (C) and fish without miss-bands (D). Values are expressed by means of mean ± SEM (n = 3). Lowercase represent statistical significant differences at level p < 0.05: (a) between 0.5 fishL−1 and the other stock densities; (b) between 1 fishL−1 and 3 fishL−1; (c) between 0.5 and 2 fishL−1.