| Literature DB >> 26069507 |
Mark Fletcher1, Mohammad Biglarbegian2, Suresh Neethirajan3.
Abstract
A nanorobot is defined as any smart structure which is capable of actuation, sensing, manipulation, intelligence, and swarm behavior at the nanoscale. In this study, we designed an intelligent system using fuzzy logic for diagnosis and treatment of tumors inside the human body using bionanorobots. We utilize fuzzy logic and a combination of thermal, magnetic, optical, and chemical nanosensors to interpret the uncertainty associated with the sensory information. Two different fuzzy logic structures, for diagnosis (Mamdani structure) and for cure (Takagi-Sugeno structure), were developed to efficiently identify the tumors and treat them through delivery of effective dosages of a drug. Validation of the designed system with simulated conditions proved that the drug delivery of bionanorobots was robust to reasonable noise that may occur in the bionanorobot sensors during navigation, diagnosis, and curing of the cancer cells. Bionanorobots represent a great hope for successful cancer therapy in the near future.Entities:
Keywords: Bionanorobot; Control system; Drug delivery; Fuzzy logic; Nanomedicine
Year: 2013 PMID: 26069507 PMCID: PMC4452041 DOI: 10.1007/s12645-013-0044-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Nanotechnol ISSN: 1868-6958
Fig. 1a Schematic illustration of the bionanorobots manoeuvering inside the blood vessel. b Bionanorobot's drug delivery to the tumor cell through attachment on the cell surface
Fig. 2Block diagram showing the design of the proposed intelligent system for bionanorobot-assisted drug delivery in cancer treatment
Fig. 3Evaluation of membership functions for fuzzy logic controlled bionanorobot assisted drug delivery system
Fig. 4Diagnosis output for the CA 125 marker versus sensitivity and concentration
Fig. 5Membership functions used in Section 5 to determine the sensitivity levels of leukemia and lymphoma
Consequent rule parameters for drug dosage delivery to tumor cells of the intelligent system
| Consequent parameters | |
|---|---|
| Rule 1 |
|
| Rule 2 |
|
Fig. 6Difference in the cyclosporine and doxorubicin dosages for different concentrations (corresponding to different noise levels) of the CA 125 marker
Fig. 7Difference in the cyclosporine and doxorubicin dosages for different concentrations (corresponding to different noise levels) of the CA 19-9 marker
| Marker | Concentration (U/ml) | Sensitivity (%) |
| CA 125 | 1.7 to 32 | 80 |
| CA 19-9 | 0 to 33 | 25.7 |