| Literature DB >> 26069132 |
Hyun Sun Ko1, Yun Seong Jo1, Yeun Hee Kim1, Yong-Gyu Park2, Jeong Ha Wie1, Juyoung Cheon1, Hee Bong Moon3, Young Lee1, Jong Chul Shin4.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The adult tetanus, reduced diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine has been introduced in order to provide individual protection and reduce the risk of transmitting pertussis to infants. We assessed the knowledge and acceptability of the Tdap vaccine around pregnancy.Entities:
Keywords: Pertussis; acceptability; immunization; knowledge
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26069132 PMCID: PMC4479837 DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.4.1071
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Yonsei Med J ISSN: 0513-5796 Impact factor: 2.759
Characteristics According to Intention of Tdap Vaccination
| Characteristics | Total (n=308) | Yes (n=283) | No (n=25) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean age (yrs) | 32.2±4.1 | 32.3±4.2 | 31.4±2.9 | 0.167 |
| Age group | 0.284 | |||
| ≤25 | 14 (4.5) | 13 (92.9) | 1 (7.1) | |
| 26-35 | 234 (76.0) | 212 (90.6) | 22 (9.4) | |
| ≥36 | 60 (19.5) | 58 (96.7) | 2 (3.3) | |
| Parity | 0.583 | |||
| Primiparous | 144 (46.8) | 131 (91.0) | 13 (9.0) | |
| Multiparous | 164 (53.3) | 152 (92.7) | 12 (7.3) | |
| Education | 1.000 | |||
| Less than elementary school | 3 (1.0) | 3 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Middle school | ||||
| High school | 48 (15.6) | 44 (91.7) | 4 (8.3) | |
| College or above | 257 (83.4) | 236 (91.8) | 21 (8.2) | |
| Pregnancy status | 0.903 | |||
| Planning pregnancy | 36 (11.7) | 34 (94.4) | 2 (5.6) | |
| Ongoing pregnancy | 259 (84.1) | 237 (91.5) | 22 (8.5) | |
| Postpartum status | 13 (4.2) | 12 (92.3) | 1 (7.7) | |
| Monthly family income in US dollar | 0.651 | |||
| <1000 | 2 (0.7) | 2 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| 1000-3000 | 93 (30.2) | 83 (89.3) | 10 (10.8) | |
| 3000-5000 | 115 (37.3) | 107 (93.0) | 8 (7.0) | |
| ≥5000 | 98 (31.8) | 91 (92.9) | 7 (7.1) | |
| Job | 0.072 | |||
| Housewife | 127 (41.2) | 116 (91.3) | 11 (8.7) | |
| Office worker | 56 (18.2) | 50 (89.3) | 6 (10.7) | |
| Production worker | 6 (2.0) | 5 (83.3) | 1 (16.7) | |
| Service worker | 6 (2.0) | 5 (83.3) | 1 (16.7) | |
| Self-employed | 4 (1.3) | 2 (50.0) | 2 (50.0) | |
| Professional | 43 (14.0) | 41 (95.4) | 2 (4.7) | |
| Student | 1 (0.3) | 1 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Health care worker | 49 (15.9) | 47 (95.9) | 2 (4.1) | |
| Other | 16 (5.2) | 16 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) |
Values were presented as n (%). p-values were obtained by chi-square or Fisher's exact test.
Knowledge and Attitudes Related to Tdap According to Intention of Pertussis Vaccination
| Items | Total (n=308) | Yes (n=283) | No (n=25) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| How do you rate the severity of pertussis among infants aged 0-6 months? | 0.164 | |||
| Highly severe | 241 (78.3) | 224 (79.2) | 17 (68.0) | |
| Reasonably | 57 (18.5) | 51 (18.0) | 6 (24.0) | |
| Not severe | 10 (3.3) | 8 (2.8) | 2 (8.0) | |
| How do you rate the extent of pertussis as a contagious disease? | 0.026 | |||
| Highly contagious | 193 (62.7) | 183 (64.7) | 10 (40.0) | |
| Reasonably contagious | 110 (35.7) | 96 (33.9) | 14 (56.0) | |
| Not contagious | 5 (1.6) | 4 (1.4) | 1 (4.0) | |
| How do you rate your risk of exposure to pertussis in the postpartum period? | 0.102 | |||
| High | 35 (11.4) | 33 (11.7) | 2 (8.0) | |
| Medium | 150 (48.7) | 142 (50.2) | 8 (32.0) | |
| Low | 123 (39.9) | 108 (38.2) | 15 (60.0) | |
| How do you rate the risk of exposure to pertussis in infants aged 0-6 months? | 0.060 | |||
| High | 87 (28.3) | 83 (29.3) | 4 (16.0) | |
| Medium | 144 (46.8) | 134 (47.4) | 10 (40.0) | |
| Low | 77 (25.0) | 66 (23.3) | 11 (44.0) | |
| How do you rate the risk of exposure to pertussis in infants aged 0-6 months if a care giver is infected by pertussis? | 0.395 | |||
| High | 233 (75.7) | 216 (76.3) | 17 (68.0) | |
| Medium | 56 (18.2) | 49 (17.3) | 7 (28.0) | |
| Low | 19 (6.2) | 18 (6.4) | 1 (4.0) | |
| Did your doctor discuss postpartum pertussis vaccination with you? | 0.620 | |||
| Yes | 15 (4.9) | 15 (5.3) | 0 (0.0) | |
| No | 293 (95.1) | 268 (94.7) | 25 (100.0) | |
| How effective do you think the adult pertussis vaccine is in preventing pertussis disease for infants aged 0-6 months? | <0.001 | |||
| Very effective | 186 (60.4) | 183 (64.7) | 3 (12.0) | |
| Not effective | 6 (2.0) | 5 (1.8) | 1 (4.0) | |
| Don't know | 116 (37.7) | 95 (33.6) | 21 (84.0) | |
| What was your reason for not receiving an adult pertussis vaccine before, during, or after pregnancy? | 0.155 | |||
| Was not aware of the need for adult pertussis vaccination | 250 (81.2) | 228 (80.6) | 22 (88.0) | |
| Thought that contraception for several months was required after adult pertussis vaccination | 4 (1.3) | 4 (1.4) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Thought that any vaccination is contraindicated during pregnancy | 36 (11.7) | 35 (12.4) | 1 (4.0) | |
| Afraid of adverse event after the vaccination | 5 (1.6) | 3 (1.1) | 2 (8.0) | |
| The cost of vaccination | 1 (0.3) | 1 (0.4) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Received vaccination or don't know whether received an adult pertussis vaccination | 12 (3.9) | 12 (4.2) | 0 (0.0) | |
| How would you rate your concern about the safety of adult pertussis vaccination during the pregnancy or breast-feeding period? | 0.850 | |||
| Very concerned | 63 (20.5) | 57 (20.1) | 6 (24.0) | |
| Slightly concerned | 211 (68.5) | 194 (68.6) | 17 (68.0) | |
| Not concerned | 34 (11.0) | 32 (11.3) | 2 (8.0) |
Values were presented as n (%). p values were obtained by chi-square or Fisher's exact test.
Factors Associated with Intention of Tdap Vaccination
| Factors | OR | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| How effective do you think the adult pertussis vaccine is in preventing pertussis disease for infants aged 0-6 months? | |||
| Very effective | 13.5 | 3.92-46.33 | 0.002 |
| Not effective | 1.1 | 0.12-9.96 | 0.292 |
| Don't know | 1 | - |
p-values were obtained by stepwise multiple logistic regression using factors with p<0.10 in univariate analyses.
The Single Most Important Factor That Influences One's Intention to Accept or Decline Tdap
| Items | Total (n=308) | Yes (n=283) | No (n=25) |
|---|---|---|---|
| If no, what is the main reason? | |||
| Concern about the safety | 16 (64.0) | ||
| Risk of exposure to pertussis might not be high in my baby | 4 (16.0) | ||
| Pertussis seems not to be a serious disease | 1 (4.0) | ||
| Medical doctors have not recommended it | 3 (12.0) | ||
| Government or public healthcare centers have not recommended it | 1 (4.0) | ||
| If yes, what is the main reason? | |||
| Maternal infection might be very contagious to the baby | 205 (72.4) | ||
| Pertussis seems to be a serious disease | 20 (7.1) | ||
| Risk of exposure to pertussis might be high in my baby | 6 (2.1) | ||
| Might be helpful for my baby's health | 43 (15.2) | ||
| Medical doctors have recommended it | 4 (1.4) | ||
| Government or public healthcare centers have recommended it | 2 (0.7) | ||
| Other | 3 (1.1) |
Values were presented as n (%).
Information or Recommendation Sources That Can Affect Tdap Vaccination
| Items | Total (n=308) | Yes (n=283) | No (n=25) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Did you know that the Korean government recommends an adult pertussis vaccination before pregnancy, during pregnancy (in case of outbreak), or during the postpartum period? | 0.622 | |||
| Yes | 11 (3.6) | 10 (3.5) | 1 (4.0) | |
| No | 279 (90.6) | 257 (90.8) | 22 (88.0) | |
| Partially | 18 (5.8) | 16 (5.7) | 2 (8.0) | |
| What might be the most influencing factor related to receiving adult pertussis vaccination before pregnancy, during pregnancy (in case of outbreak), or postpartum period? | 0.150 | |||
| Recommendation by medical staff in internal medicine or family medicine | 7 (2.3) | 7 (2.5) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Recommendation by medical staff in OB/GYN | 276 (89.6) | 254 (89.8) | 22 (88.0) | |
| Recommendation by medical staff in pediatrics | 14 (4.6) | 14 (5.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Recommendation by family | 1 (0.3) | 1 (0.4) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Recommendation by friends | ||||
| Information from other sources (TV/radio/newspaper/internet) | 10 (3.3) | 7 (2.5) | 3 (12.0) | |
Values were presented as n (%). p-values were obtained by chi-square or Fisher's exact test.