Literature DB >> 26069121

Clinical Risk Factors Affecting Procedure-Related Major Neurological Complications in Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms.

E-Wook Jang1, Yong Bae Kim1, Joonho Chung2, Sang Hyun Suh3, Chang-Ki Hong2, Jin-Yang Joo4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The operative risk and natural history rupture risk for the treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) should be evaluated. The purpose of this study was to report our experience with treating UIAs and to outline clinical risk factors associated with procedure-related major neurological complications.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We treated 1158 UIAs in 998 patients over the last 14 years. All patients underwent operation performed by a single microvascular surgeon and two interventionists at a single institution. Patient factors, aneurysm factors, and clinical outcomes were analyzed in relation to procedure-related complications.
RESULTS: The total complication rate was 22 (2.2%) out of 998 patients. Among them, complications developed in 14 (2.3%) out of 612 patients who underwent microsurgery and in 8 (2.1%) out of 386 patients who underwent endovascular procedures. One patient died due to intraoperative rupture during an endovascular procedure. The procedure-related complication was highly correlated with age (p=0.004), hypertension (p=0.002), and history of ischemic stroke (p<0.001) in univariate analysis. The multivariate analysis revealed previous history of ischemic stroke (p=0.001) to be strongly correlated with procedure-related complications.
CONCLUSION: A history of ischemic stroke was strongly correlated with procedure-related major neurological complications when treating UIAs. Accordingly, patients with UIAs who have a previous history of ischemic stroke might be at risk of procedure-related major neurological complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Unruptured intracranial aneurysm; complication; ischemic stroke; procedure

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26069121      PMCID: PMC4479867          DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.4.987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Yonsei Med J        ISSN: 0513-5796            Impact factor:   2.759


INTRODUCTION

The number of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) diagnosed is steadily increasing due to increasing numbers of geriatric patients with UIAs and increasing use of non-invasive imaging techniques. However, the process of selecting patients for treatment has not yet been well established, thus the risks of future ruptures and complications of preventive treatments not yet being sufficiently evaluated.1 The International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms and the Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysm Study of Japan2 showed an overall rupture rate with the range of 0.5% to 0.95% per year. Any treatment aiming to prevent rupture of aneurysms might reduce the rates of morbidity and mortality to below this range. Nevertheless, while many studies have analyzed the risk factors of rupture of UIAs, studies on procedure-related complications in UIA treatment are very few, due to their small incidence. This study was conducted as a review of our experience to treat UIAs, as well as to assess clinical risk factors associated with procedure-related major neurological complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients and methods

This retrospective study was approved by our Institutional Review Board and the patients informed consent were waived. We treated and retrospectively reviewed 1158 aneurysms in 998 patients during 14-year period (Table 1). All patients were treated by a single microvascular surgeon and two interventionists at a single cerebrovascular unit. Treatment decisions were made through interdisciplinary approaches by a neurovascular team. Age, gender, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, size, location, and functional outcome assessed by the modified Rankin Score (mRS) were evaluated. Other factors such as smoking, alcohol intake, or a family history of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) were excluded because of omission of data in medical records in some patients.
Table 1

Baseline Characteristics of 998 Patients with 1158 Unruptured Aneurysms

CharacteristicsClipping (n=612)Coiling (n=386)p value
Mean age, yrs±SD54.9±11.967.2±7.2<0.001
Sex, female/male404/208249/1370.633
History of hypertension (%)196 (32)147 (38)0.055
Diabetes mellitus (%)67 (11)50 (13)0.364
Ischemic stroke history (%)37 (6)27 (7)0.596
Patients with no comorbidity (%)325 (53)195 (51)0.436
Symptoms (%)
 Headache281 (46)131 (34)
 Vertigo55 (9)46 (12)
 Ischemia/TIA12 (2)23 (6)
 Visual disturbance18 (3)0 (0)
 Cranial nerve palsy12 (2)0 (0)
 Seizure1 (0.2)4 (1)
 None233 (38)182 (47)0.006
Number of aneurysms728430
Mean size of aneurysms, mm±SD6.1±2.37.3±3.8<0.001
Location of aneurysms (%)<0.001
 ICA211 (29)293 (68)
 MCA286 (39)25 (6)
 ACA214 (30)47 (11)
 VB, PCA17 (2)65 (15)

ICA, internal carotid artery; MCA, middle cerebral artery; ACA, anterior cerebral artery; VB, vertebrobasilar artery; PCA, posterior cerebral artery; TIA, transient ischemic attack; SD, standard deviation.

Complication was defined as a new disability resulting in a mRS of greater than 13 at one day after surgery. The evaluation of post-treatment was done by an independent observer. After one year, functional outcomes of patients were evaluated, except for patients with diseases caused by other medical complications. All patients were followed up by digital subtraction angiography in the first year and magnetic resonance angiography in subsequent years. Treatment criteria for UIAs were 1) patients with symptoms, 2) patients below 50 years of age, 3) with aneurysms larger than 5 mm, 4) with a daughter sac, 5) with prior SAH or family history, and 6) change of shape during the follow-up period. Treatment modality was selected based on characteristics of individual patients and UIAs through interdisciplinary decision making, offering microsurgery as a primary treatment. The patients' preferences for treatment were also considered.

Microsurgical techniques

During operation, efforts were made to preserve veins. Gradual dissection along the veins was made to avoid stretching. Veins were protected with cotton gauze to avoid heating injury during coagulation of adjacent structures. Large aneurysms were treated with multiple clippings to avoid kinking and stenosis of parent artery and perforators. Fenestrated clips were used for aneurysms with atheromatous necks to avoid squeezing and migration of atheroma. We tried to reduce the temporary clipping time for elderly patients with previous ischemic stroke since the duration of temporary clipping has been shown to be related to an increased occurrence of ischemic events.45

Endovascular techniques

All endovascular coiling was performed under general anesthesia. Systemic heparinization (50 U/kg) was administered when a guiding catheter was placed. A single microcatheter was deployed if the morphology of the aneurysm was saccular with a narrow neck. Aneurysms with unfavorable angio-architecture were required adjunctive techniques (double catheter, balloon-assisted, and stent-assisted), at the discretion of the interventionists. Dual-antiplatelet agents were administered orally for 3 months, usually with stent assisted coiling. Aspirin was maintained for at least more than 12 months. Cerebral angiographs were acquired to assess the degree of aneurysm occlusion and confirm detectable thromboembolic events.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 18.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Variables are expressed as mean±SD, number of patients (%), as appropriate. For univariate analysis, Student t-test for continuous variables, and χ2 test for categorical variables were used. Binary logistic regression analysis to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence interval were used. In the univariate analysis, age, gender, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, size, location, and functional outcomes assessed by mRS were included. Multivariate logistic regression was carried out using variables with p-value less than 0.05 on univariate analysis. All p-values<0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

In total, 1057 procedures for 1158 aneurysms were performed including staged operations for multiple aneurysms. There were 612 female and 386 male patients. The mean age of the patients was 56±8 years. The patients in the clipping group (54.9±11.9 years) were younger than those in the coiling group (67.2±7.2 years, p<0.001). For treatment, 616 microsurgical operations and 441 endovascular procedures were performed. Multiple aneurysms represented 16% of cases. UIAs were most often found in patients with headaches. A greater number of asymptomatic patients were treated by coiling (47%) than clipping (38%, p=0.006). The most common location for aneurysms was the internal carotid artery (ICA; 43.5%), followed by the middle cerebral artery (26.9%). Aneurysms in the ICA or posterior circulation were treated by endovascular treatments (30.9%, microsurgery: 19.7%, p<0.001). Mean aneurysm size was 6.7±1.3 mm. The mean aneurysm size of the clipping group (6.1±2.3 mm) was smaller than that of the coiling group (7.3±3.8 mm, p<0.01) (Table 1). On average, patients were followed for 26±10.7 months after discharge. Additional retreatment was performed in 4 patients (0.5%) of the microsurgical group and in 55 (12.8%) of the endovascular surgery group. Procedure-related complications occurred in 22 cases, including one death. Overall morbidity and mortality rates were 2.2% (22 out of 998 patients) and 0.1% (1 out of 998 patients), respectively (Table 2). Complication occurred in 14 patients (2.3%) of clipping group. The number of procedure-related complications in the coiling group was eight (2.1%). After clipping, the most common injury was vessel injury, followed by ischemic attack and post-op hematoma. In the coiling group, thromboembolism and rupture during the procedure were most common.
Table 2

Patients Who Experienced Procedure-Related Major Neurological Complications

No.SexAgeLocationSizeShapeModalityProcedure-related complicationsRisk factormRS (1 yr later)
1F72A2-3, Lt.9SaccularClippingVenous infarction, ConfusionHypertension1 (-)
2F61ICPCOM, Lt.5BilobularClippingInfarction of Lt. internal capsule, Hemiparesis, Rt. G IVOccipital infarction, Hypertension2 (2)
3F56ANCOM6SaccularClippingInfarction of fornix, Impaired cognitive functionRt. medullar infarction, Hypertension1 (-)
4F68MCBIF, Rt.8SaccularClippingInfarction of Rt. basal ganglia, Weakness of Lt. arm, G IIHypertension, Diabetes mellitus4 (3)
5F77ICPCOM, Rt.11SaccularClippingInfarction of Rt. basal ganglia, Hemiparesis, Lt. G IIINone3 (4)
6F72ICCHO, Rt.7SaccularClippingInfarction of Rt. basal ganglia, Hemiparesis, Lt. G IIILacunar infarction in peri-ventricles, Hypertension3 (3)
7F59MCBIF, Rt.5SaccularClippingICH around clipping site, Hemiparesis, Lt. G IVHypertension, Diabetes mellitus1 (-)
8F66MCBIF, Rt.5SaccularClippingInfarction of Rt. basal ganglia, Hemiparesis, Lt. G IVLt. basal ganglia infarction, Hypertension2 (2)
9M51MCBIF, Rt.9SaccularClippingInfarction of Rt. temporal lobe, Motor aphasiaHypertension2 (1)
10F52ICoph, Lt.5BroadClippingLt. visual lossNone1 (1)
11F65M1, Lt.5SaccularClippingInfarction of Lt. basal ganglia, Rt. facial palsy, Rt. leg weakness G IIIHypertension3 (1)
12F65MCBIF, Lt.7BroadClippingInfarction of Lt. basal ganglia, Rt. facial palsy, Rt. hemiparesis G I dysarthriaHypertension4 (4)
13M64VA, Lt.18SaccularClippingInjury of AICA, Dysphagia, Rt. hemiparesis G IIIHypertension5 (4)
14F64IC-Oph, Lt.6SaccularClippingLt. visual lossNone1 (1)
15F68BABIF5SaccularCoilingIntraoperative rupture, ComaInfarction of Rt. frontal, Hypertension5 (5)
16F71ICPCOM, Rt.14SaccularCoilingInfarction of Rt. MCA territory due to Thromboembolism, Lt. hemiplegiaNone4 (4)
17M77ANCOM5SaccularCoilingInfarction of distal ACA territory, Both lower extremities weakness G IIIInfarction of Lt. frontal, Hypertension4 (4)
18F64BABIF6SaccularCoilingIntraoperative rupture, DeathInfarction of Lt. basal ganglia6 (6)
19F64ANCOM6SaccularCoilingA2 occlusion due to coil migration, Stupor, Rt. hemiparesis G IILacunar infarction in peri-ventricles, Hypertension5 (4)
20F56ICA, Lt.7SaccularCoilingIntraoperative rupture, Drowsy mental statusNone1 (-)
21F62ICPCOM, Lt.9SaccularCoilingInfarction of Lt. MCA territory, Thromboembolism, aphasiaNone1 (1)
22M48VA, Lt.7FusiformCoilingInfarction of Lt. cerebellum, Thromboembolism, Lt. deafnessInfarction of Rt. Cerebellum with Rt. deafness2 (2)

A2-3, distal anterior cerebral artery; ANCOM, anterior communicating artery; ICA, distal internal carotid artery; IC-Oph, paraophthalmic artery; ICCHO, anterior choroidal artery; ICPCOM, posterior communicating artery; MCBIF, middle cerebral bifurcation artery; M1, proximal middle cerebral artery; MCA, middle cerebral artery; BABIF, basilar bifurcation artery; VA, vertebrobasilar artery; ICH, intracerebral hemorrhage; AICA, anterior inferior cerebellar artery.

The factors affecting procedure-related complications were age (mean age in patients without complications: 59.7±10.6 years, mean age in patients with complications; 63.7±16.9 years, p=0.004), hypertension (p=0.001), and history of ischemic stroke (p<0.001) in univariate analysis. Past history of ischemic stroke (p=0.001) was strongly associated with functional outcomes in multivariate analysis (Table 3).
Table 3

Univariate Analysis and Multivariate Analysis of Various Factors Related Complications

Univariate analysisMultivariate analysis
p valueOR for Cx95% CI for ORp valueOR for Cx95% CI for OR
Age0.0041.0591.018-1.1020.3271.0280.972-1.088
HTN0.0024.2331.709-10.4850.3391.7980.54-5.981
Stroke Hx<0.0019.3883.78-23.3130.0015.632.093-15.145
Size0.0731.1150.99-1.257
DM0.6990.7490.173-3.245
Location0.0972.5580.845-7.746

HTN, hypertension; Stroke Hx, past ischemic stroke history; DM, diabetes mellitus; Cx, complications; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

DISCUSSION

We experienced 22 complications (2.2%; 2.3% in clipping group and 2.1% in coiling group) among a total of 998 patients with UIAs. Previous studies showed the rate of morbidity and mortality to range from 1.06% to 15.7%.678910 Compared to recent studies, the rates in the present study are similar: our results as well as those of previous reports showed slightly higher morbidity and mortality compared to the risk of rupture of UIAs.211 Our study revealed that procedural adverse events in the patients with treated UIAs were highly correlated to past history of ischemic stroke. In our study, patients who experienced thromboembolic complications in the coiling group tended to have a past history of ischemic stroke (62.5%). There is currently no report describing the direct relationship between procedure-related complications in the endovascular treatment of UIAs and history of ischemic stroke. According to several studies,1213 general anesthesia for endovascular treatment might be related to cerebrovascular injuries. Additionally, a history of ischemic stroke may be correlated with injuries to vessels in the surgical field. Furthermore, previous studies showed that the incidence of stroke events in patients with a history of stroke was higher than that in the general population after clipping.1415 Wiebers, et al.10 suggested previous ischemic cerebral vascular disease as a predictive variable of poor surgical outcomes. In the present study, we found that age and hypertension were associated with procedure-related complications. However, in the previous studies, only the rupture risk of small UIAs was shown in patients with old age or hypertension.1011 Thus, age and hypertension may increase cerebrovascular events as atherosclerotic burdens. Previous studies have suggested size,16 location, multiplicity,17 temporary clipping,18 and calcification of the aneurysm19 as predictors of outcomes for treatment of UIAs. In the present study, however, size did not show any statistical significance in our study. The reason is probably that, in regards to aneurysm size, our indications for treating UIAs were smaller than those in other studies; we treated UIAs with a size of 5 mm. As a result of genetic differences, aneurysms of Eastern Asian patients tend to rupture more easily at sizes smaller than 7 mm.21120 In addition to aneurysm size, aneurysm location also did not affect the outcomes of treatment in this study. This might be because we preferred to treat anterior circulation aneurysms predominantly by clipping rather than coiling. Previous studies showed that posterior circulation is related to poor outcomes in the treatment of aneurysms.16192122 The recovery rate for neurologic deficits was higher in the clipping group [7 (50%) out of 14] than the coiling group [2 (25%) out of 8]. At one-year clinical follow-up, there were some cases in which complications were improved, and complications fully recovered in a few patients who exhibited neurologic deficits at discharge. According to subgroup analysis, the mean mRS of the clipping group with complications was 2.36 at one day after surgery and improved to 1.86 after one year. Meanwhile, the mean mRS of the coiling group with complications was 3.5 at one day after surgery, and nearly recovered to 3.13 after one year. Nevertheless, this difference between the two groups did not have statistical significance (p=0.357). The reason, that neurologic deficits tended to recover more frequently in the clipping group than the coiling group, might be relatively younger age (p<0.001) of patients treated by microsurgery. Therefore, the chances that the procedure-related complications in the clipping group recovered over time might be higher than those for the coiling group. The another reason for this result could also be that thromboembolic complications in the coiling group might be more permanent than a vessel injury or a post-operative hematoma in the clipping group. There were some limitations to this study. First, this study was retrospective and cannot exclude possible selection bias. A neurosurgeon and two interventionists made decisions on a case-by case basis, following our own management protocols without randomization. As a result, more elderly patients and more patients with ICA or posterior circulation aneurysms were treated with endovascular treatment. Notwithstanding, the patients were collected via prospectively designed hospital database and assessed by an independent observer. Second, smoking, alcohol intake, cholesterol levels, obesity, and cardiovascular disease could not be analyzed. These factors are known to be associated with the occurrence of the ischemic stroke,232425 and could be related to procedure-related complications. A few latest western society studies demonstrated factors predicting inpatient complications from cerebral aneurysm clipping in patients.1526 However, our study is the first to report that previous ischemic stroke could be a risk factor in patients with surgically or endovascularly treated UIAs in Korean. A history of ischemic stroke was strongly correlated with procedure-related major neurological complications when treating UIAs. Accordingly, patients with UIAs who have a previous history of ischemic stroke might be at risk of procedure-related major neurological complications.
  26 in total

1.  Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients.

Authors:  J C van Swieten; P J Koudstaal; M C Visser; H J Schouten; J van Gijn
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Small unruptured intracranial aneurysm verification study: SUAVe study, Japan.

Authors:  Makoto Sonobe; Tomosato Yamazaki; Masahiro Yonekura; Haruhiko Kikuchi
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Outcomes for unruptured ophthalmic segment aneurysm surgery.

Authors:  Leon Tat Lai; Michael Kerin Morgan
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 1.961

4.  Morbidity and mortality from surgical treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms at Research Institute for Brain and Blood Vessels-Akita.

Authors:  Junta Moroi; Hiromu Hadeishi; Akifumi Suzuki; Nobuyuki Yasui
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Long-term prognosis in patients with clipped unruptured cerebral aneurysms--increased cerebrovascular events in patients with surgically treated unruptured aneurysms.

Authors:  Masaaki Hokari; Satoshi Kuroda; Naoki Nakayama; Kiyohiro Houkin; Tatsuya Ishikawa; Hiroyasu Kamiyama
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  A clinical study of the parameters and effects of temporary arterial occlusion in the management of intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  D Samson; H H Batjer; G Bowman; L Mootz; W J Krippner; Y J Meyer; B C Allen
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  High cholesterol levels are associated with improved long-term survival after acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Ioanna Markaki; Ulrik Nilsson; Konstantinos Kostulas; Christina Sjöstrand
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 2.136

8.  Microsurgical treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. A consecutive surgical experience consisting of 450 aneurysms treated in the endovascular era.

Authors:  Eric S Nussbaum; Michael T Madison; Mark E Myers; James Goddard
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  2007-02-15

Review 9.  Guidelines for the surgical treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: the first annual J. Lawrence pool memorial research symposium--controversies in the management of cerebral aneurysms.

Authors:  Ricardo J Komotar; J Mocco; Robert A Solomon
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Predicting inpatient complications from cerebral aneurysm clipping: the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2005-2009.

Authors:  Kimon Bekelis; Symeon Missios; Todd A MacKenzie; Atman Desai; Adina Fischer; Nicos Labropoulos; David W Roberts
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  9 in total

1.  Outflow angle measurement: a simple approach for the differential diagnosis of intracranial protrusion with a branch artery arising from its top.

Authors:  Mo Chen; Hong-Mei Song; Ming-Hua Li; Wu Wang; Yong-Dong Li
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Clipping versus coiling in posterior circulation intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Eleni Tsianaka; Abdullah Al-Shawish; Alexander Potapov; Kostas Fountas; Michael Spyrou; Nikolay Konovalov
Journal:  Chin Neurosurg J       Date:  2019-06-19

3.  Risk Score for Neurological Complications After Endovascular Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms.

Authors:  Wenjun Ji; Aihua Liu; Xianli Lv; Huibin Kang; Liqian Sun; Youxiang Li; Xinjian Yang; Chuhan Jiang; Zhongxue Wu
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Risk Factors for the Rupture of Bifurcation Intracranial Aneurysms Using CT Angiography.

Authors:  Guang Xian Wang; Dong Zhang; Zhi Ping Wang; Liu Qing Yang; Lei Zhang; Li Wen
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.759

5.  The efficacy of microsurgery in the treatment of cerebral aneurysm rupture and its effect on NF-κB, MCP-1 and MMP-9.

Authors:  Xintong Zhang; Lei Chen; Feng Zheng; Yanli Du
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 2.447

6.  Clipping versus coiling in unruptured anterior cerebral circulation aneurysms.

Authors:  Farrag Mohammad; Takashi Horiguchi; Katsuhiro Mizutani; Kazunari Yoshida
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2020-03-21

7.  Meta-Analysis of Clipping versus Coiling for the Treatment of Unruptured Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms: Direct Comparison of Procedure-Related Complications.

Authors:  Wen-Qiang Xin; Qi-Qiang Xin; Xin-Yu Yang
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 2.570

8.  [Progressive hematoma in anterior neck after endovascular treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysm].

Authors:  Aysun Ankay Yilbas; Cigdem Kanburoglu; Filiz Uzumcugil; Coskun Cifci; Ozge Ozen Saralp; Heves Karagoz; Seda Banu Akinci; Anil Arat
Journal:  Braz J Anesthesiol       Date:  2016-12-23

9.  Endovascular coiling versus surgical clipping for the treatment of unruptured cerebral aneurysms: Direct comparison of procedure-related complications.

Authors:  Xiao-Kui Kang; Sheng-Fu Guo; Yi Lei; Wei Wei; Hui-Xin Liu; Li-Li Huang; Qun-Long Jiang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.817

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.