Literature DB >> 26068742

Computational Methods for RNA Structure Validation and Improvement.

Swati Jain1, David C Richardson2, Jane S Richardson3.   

Abstract

With increasing recognition of the roles RNA molecules and RNA/protein complexes play in an unexpected variety of biological processes, understanding of RNA structure-function relationships is of high current importance. To make clean biological interpretations from three-dimensional structures, it is imperative to have high-quality, accurate RNA crystal structures available, and the community has thoroughly embraced that goal. However, due to the many degrees of freedom inherent in RNA structure (especially for the backbone), it is a significant challenge to succeed in building accurate experimental models for RNA structures. This chapter describes the tools and techniques our research group and our collaborators have developed over the years to help RNA structural biologists both evaluate and achieve better accuracy. Expert analysis of large, high-resolution, quality-conscious RNA datasets provides the fundamental information that enables automated methods for robust and efficient error diagnosis in validating RNA structures at all resolutions. The even more crucial goal of correcting the diagnosed outliers has steadily developed toward highly effective, computationally based techniques. Automation enables solving complex issues in large RNA structures, but cannot circumvent the need for thoughtful examination of local details, and so we also provide some guidance for interpreting and acting on the results of current structure validation for RNA.
© 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Clash correction; ERRASER; MolProbity; PHENIX; RNA backbone conformers; RNA crystallography; Ribose pucker; wwPDB validation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26068742     DOI: 10.1016/bs.mie.2015.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Enzymol        ISSN: 0076-6879            Impact factor:   1.600


  9 in total

1.  The Halastavi árva Virus Intergenic Region IRES Promotes Translation by the Simplest Possible Initiation Mechanism.

Authors:  Irina S Abaeva; Quentin Vicens; Anthony Bochler; Heddy Soufari; Angelita Simonetti; Tatyana V Pestova; Yaser Hashem; Christopher U T Hellen
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 9.423

2.  Structural Analysis of Multi-Helical RNAs by NMR-SAXS/WAXS: Application to the U4/U6 di-snRNA.

Authors:  Gabriel Cornilescu; Allison L Didychuk; Margaret L Rodgers; Lauren A Michael; Jordan E Burke; Eric J Montemayor; Aaron A Hoskins; Samuel E Butcher
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Structures and dynamics of hibernating ribosomes from Staphylococcus aureus mediated by intermolecular interactions of HPF.

Authors:  Iskander Khusainov; Quentin Vicens; Rustam Ayupov; Konstantin Usachev; Alexander Myasnikov; Angelita Simonetti; Shamil Validov; Bruno Kieffer; Gulnara Yusupova; Marat Yusupov; Yaser Hashem
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Structure of the 70S ribosome from human pathogen Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Iskander Khusainov; Quentin Vicens; Anthony Bochler; François Grosse; Alexander Myasnikov; Jean-François Ménétret; Johana Chicher; Stefano Marzi; Pascale Romby; Gulnara Yusupova; Marat Yusupov; Yaser Hashem
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Model validation: local diagnosis, correction and when to quit.

Authors:  Jane S Richardson; Christopher J Williams; Bradley J Hintze; Vincent B Chen; Michael G Prisant; Lizbeth L Videau; David C Richardson
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 7.652

6.  Nucleobase carbonyl groups are poor Mg2+ inner-sphere binders but excellent monovalent ion binders-a critical PDB survey.

Authors:  Filip Leonarski; Luigi D'Ascenzo; Pascal Auffinger
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 4.942

7.  Assessment of the nucleotide modifications in the high-resolution cryo-electron microscopy structure of the Escherichia coli 50S subunit.

Authors:  Vanja Stojković; Alexander G Myasnikov; Iris D Young; Adam Frost; James S Fraser; Danica Galonić Fujimori
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: recent developments in Phenix.

Authors:  Dorothee Liebschner; Pavel V Afonine; Matthew L Baker; Gábor Bunkóczi; Vincent B Chen; Tristan I Croll; Bradley Hintze; Li Wei Hung; Swati Jain; Airlie J McCoy; Nigel W Moriarty; Robert D Oeffner; Billy K Poon; Michael G Prisant; Randy J Read; Jane S Richardson; David C Richardson; Massimo D Sammito; Oleg V Sobolev; Duncan H Stockwell; Thomas C Terwilliger; Alexandre G Urzhumtsev; Lizbeth L Videau; Christopher J Williams; Paul D Adams
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 7.652

9.  Improved chemistry restraints for crystallographic refinement by integrating the Amber force field into Phenix.

Authors:  Nigel W Moriarty; Pawel A Janowski; Jason M Swails; Hai Nguyen; Jane S Richardson; David A Case; Paul D Adams
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 7.652

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.