Literature DB >> 26068570

INR optimization based on stroke risk factors in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

Jee Eun Chung1, Yoo Ri Choi2, Jong Mi Seong3, Hyen O La4, Hye Sun Gwak5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bleeding complications have been frequently reported in East Asian patients on warfarin with a target international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.0-3.0.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify the optimal therapeutic range of the INR in Korean patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Setting Cardiovascular department of a 1320 inpatient bed Korean hospital.
METHOD: Retrospective chart review was conducted on 1014 patients for a total follow-up period of 2249.2 patient years. Major thromboembolic and bleeding complications were evaluated. The INR incidence of complication curve was plotted, and the optimal therapeutic range of INR was determined from the intersection of curves to ensure the lowest incidences of both thromboembolic and bleeding complications. For subgroup analysis, all patients were stratified by the following factors: age (above 75), disease (presence of hypertension, diabetes, congestive heart failure, and a history of stroke or thromboembolism), rhythm control procedure, and concurrent aspirin therapy. Main outcome measure Optimal therapeutic ranges of INR according to the risk factors.
RESULTS: A total of 41 thromboembolic and 91 bleeding events occurred during the follow-up period. The complication rates were the lowest at an INR of 1.9 and the optimal therapeutic range was estimated to be 1.7-2.2 for the overall patients. The optimal therapeutic ranges of INR in the stratified patients were determined as follows: 1.3-1.8 in the patients ≥75 years of age; 1.5-2.0 in patients with hypertension, diabetes and concurrent aspirin therapy; 1.8-2.3 in patients with congestive heart failure; 1.9-2.4 in patients with previous stroke or thromboembolism; 1.7-2.2 in patients who had undergone rhythm control procedures. It has been shown that, by keeping the INR within these ranges, complication risks could be significantly reduced by up to 81 %.
CONCLUSION: The intensity of anticoagulation therapy for Korean patients with NVAF is optimal when INR is between 1.7 and 2.2.

Entities:  

Keywords:  International normalized ratio; Korea; Non-valvular atrial fibrillation; Warfarin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26068570     DOI: 10.1007/s11096-015-0149-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm


  22 in total

1.  Comparison of bleeding in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation treated with ximelagatran or warfarin: assessment of incidence, case-fatality rate, time course and sites of bleeding, and risk factors for bleeding.

Authors:  James D Douketis; Karin Arneklev; Samuel Z Goldhaber; John Spandorfer; Frank Halperin; Jay Horrow
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-04-24

2.  Effects of anticoagulation intensity on hemostatic markers in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Takashi Nozawa; Hiroshi Inoue; Atsushi Iwasa; Ken Okumura; Lee Jong-dae; Akihiko Shimizu; Motonobu Hayano; Katsusuke Yano
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.993

3.  Rivaroxaban for stroke prevention in East Asian patients from the ROCKET AF trial.

Authors:  Ka Sing Lawrence Wong; Dai Yi Hu; Abraham Oomman; Ru-San Tan; Manesh R Patel; Daniel E Singer; Günter Breithardt; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Richard C Becker; Robert Califf; Keith A A Fox; Scott D Berkowitz; Werner Hacke; Graeme J Hankey
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Trends in Oral Anticoagulation Therapy Among Korean Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: The KORean Atrial Fibrillation Investigation.

Authors:  Hong-Won Shin; Yoon-Nyun Kim; Han-Jun Bae; Ho-Myung Lee; Hyun-Ok Cho; Yun-Kyeong Cho; Hyoung-Seob Park; Hyuck-Jun Yoon; Hyungseop Kim; Chang-Wook Nam; Seung-Ho Hur; Kwon-Bae Kim; Young-Soo Lee
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 3.243

5.  Is INR between 2.0 and 3.0 the optimal level for Chinese patients on warfarin therapy for moderate-intensity anticoagulation?

Authors:  J H S You; F W H Chan; R S M Wong; G Cheng
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Effects of fixed low-dose warfarin, aspirin-warfarin combination therapy, and dose-adjusted warfarin on thrombogenesis in chronic atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  F L Li-Saw-Hee; A D Blann; G Y Lip
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  The pharmacology and management of the vitamin K antagonists: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy.

Authors:  Jack Ansell; Jack Hirsh; Leon Poller; Henry Bussey; Alan Jacobson; Elaine Hylek
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 8.  Incidence, case fatality, and functional outcome of intracerebral haemorrhage over time, according to age, sex, and ethnic origin: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Charlotte Jj van Asch; Merel Ja Luitse; Gabriël Je Rinkel; Ingeborg van der Tweel; Ale Algra; Catharina Jm Klijn
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 44.182

9.  Is long-term pharmacist-managed anticoagulation service efficient? A pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Lyne Lalonde; Josée Martineau; Normand Blais; Martine Montigny; Jeffrey Ginsberg; Martine Fournier; Djamal Berbiche; Marie-Claude Vanier; Lucie Blais; Sylvie Perreault; Isabel Rodrigues
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 4.749

10.  Antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition).

Authors:  Daniel E Singer; Gregory W Albers; James E Dalen; Margaret C Fang; Alan S Go; Jonathan L Halperin; Gregory Y H Lip; Warren J Manning
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 9.410

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.