Literature DB >> 26068158

Practical considerations for conducting dental clinical trials in primary care.

J M Martin-Kerry1, T J Lamont2, A Keightley2, H Calache3, R Martin4, R Floate2, K Princi5, A M de Silva6.   

Abstract

There is increasing importance placed on conducting clinical trials in dentistry to provide a robust evidence base for the treatment provided, and models of care delivered. However, providing the evidence upon which to base such decisions is not straightforward, as the conduct of these trials is complex. Currently, only limited information is available about the strategies to deliver successful clinical trials in primary care settings, and even less available on dental clinical trials. Considerable knowledge and experience is lost once a trial is completed as details about effective management of a trial are generally not reported or disseminated to trial managers and researchers. This leads to loss of vital knowledge that could assist with the effective delivery of new trials. The aim of this study is to examine the conduct and delivery of five dental clinical trials across both Australia and the UK and identify the various factors that impacted upon their implementation. Findings suggest that early stakeholder engagement, and well-designed and managed trials, lead to improved outcomes for researchers, clinic staff and patients, and increases the potential for future dissemination and translation of information into practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26068158     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Dent J        ISSN: 0007-0610            Impact factor:   1.626


  5 in total

1.  How to design a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  P Brocklehurst; Z Hoare
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Developing and evaluating multimedia information resources to improve engagement of children, adolescents, and their parents with trials (TRECA study): Study protocol for a series of linked randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Jacqueline Martin-Kerry; Peter Bower; Bridget Young; Jonathan Graffy; Rebecca Sheridan; Ian Watt; Paul Baines; Catherine Stones; Jennifer Preston; Steven Higgins; Carrol Gamble; Peter Knapp
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  Protocol for a feasibility study of a self-help cognitive behavioural therapy resource for the reduction of dental anxiety in young people.

Authors:  Zoe Marshman; Annie Morgan; Jenny Porritt; Ekta Gupta; Sarah Baker; Cathy Creswell; Tim Newton; Katherine Stevens; Christopher Williams; Suneeta Prasad; Jennifer Kirby; Helen Rodd
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2016-03-01

4.  Presenting information on dental risk: PREFER study protocol for a randomised controlled trial involving patients receiving a dental check-up.

Authors:  Rebecca Harris; Christopher Vernazza; Louise Laverty; Victoria Lowers; Stephen Brown; Girvan Burnside; Laura Ternent; Susan Higham; Jimmy Steele
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2018-05-07

5.  Comparing how patients value and respond to information on risk given in three different forms during dental check-ups: the PREFER randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  R Harris; V Lowers; L Laverty; C Vernazza; G Burnside; S Brown; L Ternent
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 2.279

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.