Literature DB >> 26067954

Genome Sequence of Lactobacillus rhamnosus Strain CNCM I-3698.

R Tareb, M Bernardeau, J P Vernoux1.   

Abstract

Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-3698 is a commercially available probiotic that is used in animal feed as an additive. Here, we announce the draft genome sequence for this strain, consisting of 71 contigs corresponding to 2,966,480 bp and a G+C content of 46.69%.
Copyright © 2015 Tareb et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26067954      PMCID: PMC4463519          DOI: 10.1128/genomeA.00582-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Announc


GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Lactobacilli colonize the human and animal gastrointestinal tract as normal flora (1), and they can regulate the intestinal homeostasis by providing several beneficial properties, including pathogen inhibition and immunomodulation (1–4). Lactobacillus rhamnosus CNCM I-3698 was isolated from goat rumen. It is a probiotic strain having a scientific and commercial interest. It is currently used as a feed additive in Europe (5). Antagonistic activities against zoonotic pathogens of swine, such as Brachyspira spp. (6) and Campylobacter spp. (7), have been demonstrated in vitro, most likely through aggregation and adhesion exclusion properties. Antimicrobial and zootechnical properties have been demonstrated in vivo in pigs (8). The uncompleted draft genome sequence of L. rhamnosus CNCM I-3698 was determined by paired-end sequencing using the Illumina GAIIx platform (BaseClear, the Netherlands), with a 100-bp paired-end library and a coverage of >100×. The reads were assembled de novo into 71 contigs using CLC Genomics Workbench 5.0 (CLC bio, Denmark). The functional annotation of predicted genes was achieved using the RAST server (9) and the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP). The draft genome of L. rhamnosus CNCM I-3698 includes 2,966,480 bp, with a G+C content of 46.69%. L. rhamnosus CNCM I-3698 contains 2,939 predicted protein-coding genes and 55 RNA coding regions. Among all predicted protein-coding genes, we assigned 2,014 (68.5%) to known protein functions, with 925 (31.5%) remaining as hypothetical proteins. There are 328 subsystems that are represented in the genome, and we used this information to reconstruct the metabolic network (determined using the RAST server). Preliminary comparative analysis using the MUMmer method (10) and genomic BLAST (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sutils/genom_table.cgi) (11) of L. rhamnosus CNCM I-3698 and four other currently available L. rhamnosus complete genome sequences (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/) showed that L. rhamnosus CNCM I-3698 is of low similarity to the probiotic isolates L. rhamnosus GG substrain Helsinki and substrain Tokyo (query cover, 87%; 100% maximum identity). In contrast, L. rhamnosus CNCM I-3698 is highly similar to the dairy industry isolates L. rhamnosus Lc 705 (query cover, 97%; 100% maximum identity) and L. rhamnosus ATCC 8530 (query cover, 97%; 100% maximum identity). Genome analysis identified the presence of genes encoding proteins for a variety of cell surface proteins involved in cell aggregation, biofilm formation, and adherence, which may play an important role in the colonization of the gastrointestinal tract. The genome contains coding sequences related to fibronectin/fibrinogen binding protein; translation elongation factor Tu; mucus binding factor and adhesin involved in aggregation, adhesion, and biofilm formation; lipoprotein; lipoteichoic acids; a bacteriocin biosynthetic protein; and a bile salt hydrolase. Those functions likely contribute to the gastric survival of the strain and promote its interactions with the intestinal mucosa and microbiota, such as competitive exclusion of pathogenic bacteria and modulation of the immune system (12, 13). A more detailed analysis aiming at evaluating the stability, safety, functional, and metabolic aspects of this strain is in progress.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.

This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession no. LAZE00000000. The version described in this paper is version LAZE01000000.
  11 in total

1.  Genomic BLAST: custom-defined virtual databases for complete and unfinished genomes.

Authors:  Leda Cummings; Leigh Riley; Lori Black; Alexander Souvorov; Sergei Resenchuk; Ilya Dondoshansky; Tatiana Tatusova
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2002-11-05       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 2.  Genes and molecules of lactobacilli supporting probiotic action.

Authors:  Sarah Lebeer; Jos Vanderleyden; Sigrid C J De Keersmaecker
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 3.  Recent advances in the role of probiotics in human inflammation and gut health.

Authors:  Prithy Rupa; Yoshinori Mine
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 5.279

4.  Using MUMmer to identify similar regions in large sequence sets.

Authors:  Arthur L Delcher; Steven L Salzberg; Adam M Phillippy
Journal:  Curr Protoc Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-02

Review 5.  Probiotic mechanisms of action.

Authors:  Miriam Bermudez-Brito; Julio Plaza-Díaz; Sergio Muñoz-Quezada; Carolina Gómez-Llorente; Angel Gil
Journal:  Ann Nutr Metab       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 3.374

6.  Characterization of MabA, a modulator of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG adhesion and biofilm formation.

Authors:  Mónica Perea Vélez; Mariya I Petrova; Sarah Lebeer; Tine L A Verhoeven; Ingmar Claes; Ivo Lambrichts; Soile Tynkkynen; Jos Vanderleyden; Sigrid C J De Keersmaecker
Journal:  FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-09

7.  In vitro characterization of aggregation and adhesion properties of viable and heat-killed forms of two probiotic Lactobacillus strains and interaction with foodborne zoonotic bacteria, especially Campylobacter jejuni.

Authors:  Raouf Tareb; Marion Bernardeau; Marielle Gueguen; Jean-Paul Vernoux
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 2.472

8.  In vitro antagonistic activities of Lactobacillus spp. against Brachyspira hyodysenteriae and Brachyspira pilosicoli.

Authors:  Marion Bernardeau; Micheline Gueguen; David G E Smith; Enrique Corona-Barrera; Jean Paul Vernoux
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology.

Authors:  Ramy K Aziz; Daniela Bartels; Aaron A Best; Matthew DeJongh; Terrence Disz; Robert A Edwards; Kevin Formsma; Svetlana Gerdes; Elizabeth M Glass; Michael Kubal; Folker Meyer; Gary J Olsen; Robert Olson; Andrei L Osterman; Ross A Overbeek; Leslie K McNeil; Daniel Paarmann; Tobias Paczian; Bruce Parrello; Gordon D Pusch; Claudia Reich; Rick Stevens; Olga Vassieva; Veronika Vonstein; Andreas Wilke; Olga Zagnitko
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 10.  Modern approaches in probiotics research to control foodborne pathogens.

Authors:  Mary Anne Roshni Amalaradjou; Arun K Bhunia
Journal:  Adv Food Nutr Res       Date:  2012
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Biodiversity of Intestinal Lactic Acid Bacteria in the Healthy Population.

Authors:  Marika Mikelsaar; Epp Sepp; Jelena Štšepetova; Epp Songisepp; Reet Mändar
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  Complete genome sequence of Lactobacillus pentosus SLC13, isolated from mustard pickles, a potential probiotic strain with antimicrobial activity against foodborne pathogenic microorganisms.

Authors:  Min-Lang Huang; Jing-Yao Huang; Cheng-Yen Kao; Tony J Fang
Journal:  Gut Pathog       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 4.181

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.