Literature DB >> 26067786

Enhancement of non-invasive trans-membrane drug delivery using ultrasound and microbubbles during physiologically relevant flow.

Farah E Shamout1, Antonios N Pouliopoulos1, Patrizia Lee1, Simone Bonaccorsi1, Leila Towhidi1, Rob Krams1, James J Choi2.   

Abstract

Sonoporation has been associated with drug delivery across cell membranes and into target cells, yet several limitations have prohibited further advancement of this technology. Higher delivery rates were associated with increased cellular death, thus implying a safety-efficacy trade-off. Meanwhile, there has been no reported study of safe in vitro sonoporation in a physiologically relevant flow environment. The objective of our study was not only to evaluate sonoporation under physiologically relevant flow conditions, such as fluid velocity, shear stress and temperature, but also to design ultrasound parameters that exploit the presence of flow to maximize sonoporation efficacy while minimizing or avoiding cellular damage. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (EA.hy926) were seeded in flow chambers as a monolayer to mimic the endothelium. A peristaltic pump maintained a constant fluid velocity of 12.5 cm/s. A focused 0.5 MHz transducer was used to sonicate the cells, while an inserted focused 7.5 MHz passive cavitation detector monitored microbubble-seeded cavitation emissions. Under these conditions, propidium iodide, which is normally impermeable to the cell membrane, was traced to determine whether it could enter cells after sonication. Meanwhile, calcein-AM was used as a cell viability marker. A range of focused ultrasound parameters was explored, with several unique bioeffects observed: cell detachment, preservation of cell viability with no membrane penetration, cell death and preservation of cell viability with sonoporation. The parameters were then modified further to produce safe sonoporation with minimal cell death. To increase the number of favourable cavitation events, we lowered the ultrasound exposure pressure to 40 kPapk-neg and increased the number of cavitation nuclei by 50 times to produce a trans-membrane delivery rate of 62.6% ± 4.3% with a cell viability of 95% ± 4.2%. Furthermore, acoustic cavitation analysis showed that the low pressure sonication produced stable and non-inertial cavitation throughout the pulse sequence. To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate a high drug delivery rate coupled with high cell viability in a physiologically relevant in vitro flow system.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EA.hy926; Endothelial cells; Microbubbles; Sonoporation; Trans-membrane drug delivery; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26067786     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  13 in total

1.  Pulse inversion enhances the passive mapping of microbubble-based ultrasound therapy.

Authors:  Antonios N Pouliopoulos; Mark T Burgess; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  Appl Phys Lett       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Ultrasound-Stimulated Phase-Change Contrast Agents for Transepithelial Delivery of Macromolecules, Toward Gastrointestinal Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Samantha M Fix; Bhanu P Koppolu; Anthony Novell; Jared Hopkins; Thomas M Kierski; David A Zaharoff; Paul A Dayton; Virginie Papadopoulou
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  The Significance of PAX8-PPARγ Expression in Thyroid Cancer and the Application of a PAX8-PPARγ-Targeted Ultrasound Contrast Agent in the Early Diagnosis of Thyroid Cancer.

Authors:  Tianbing Fan; Wenbo Zhu; Min Kong; Xiaochan Yang; Cheng Wang; Min Wang; Zhaoyin Wang
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 3.009

4.  A Clinical System for Non-invasive Blood-Brain Barrier Opening Using a Neuronavigation-Guided Single-Element Focused Ultrasound Transducer.

Authors:  Antonios N Pouliopoulos; Shih-Ying Wu; Mark T Burgess; Maria Eleni Karakatsani; Hermes A S Kamimura; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 5.  Ultrasound-Responsive Nanocarriers in Cancer Treatment: A Review.

Authors:  Nahid S Awad; Vinod Paul; Nour M AlSawaftah; Gail Ter Haar; Theresa M Allen; William G Pitt; Ghaleb A Husseini
Journal:  ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci       Date:  2021-03-03

6.  A Highly Efficient One-for-All Nanodroplet for Ultrasound Imaging-Guided and Cavitation-Enhanced Photothermal Therapy.

Authors:  Dui Qin; Lei Zhang; Hongrui Zhu; Junjie Chen; Daocheng Wu; Ayache Bouakaz; Mingxi Wan; Yi Feng
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2021-04-30

7.  Clinical study of ultrasound and microbubbles for enhancing chemotherapeutic sensitivity of malignant tumors in digestive system.

Authors:  Yanjie Wang; Yan Li; Kun Yan; Lin Shen; Wei Yang; Jifang Gong; Ke Ding
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 5.087

8.  Concurrent Osteosarcoma Theranostic Strategy Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Drug-Loaded Bubbles.

Authors:  Tai-Tzung Kuo; Chung-Hsin Wang; Jir-You Wang; Hong-Jen Chiou; Ching-Hsiang Fan; Chih-Kuang Yeh
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 6.321

9.  Superharmonic microbubble Doppler effect in ultrasound therapy.

Authors:  Antonios N Pouliopoulos; James J Choi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Sonoporation by microbubbles as gene therapy approach against liver cancer.

Authors:  Luca Rinaldi; Veronica Folliero; Luciana Palomba; Carla Zannella; Rachele Isticato; Raffaele Di Francia; Massimiliano Berretta; Ilario de Sio; Luigi E Adinolfi; Giancarlo Morelli; Secondo Lastoria; Lucia Altucci; Carlo Pedone; Massimiliano Galdiero; Gianluigi Franci
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-08-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.