Literature DB >> 26067344

Numbers are not like words: Different pathways for literacy and numeracy.

Manuel Carreiras1, Philip J Monahan2, Mikel Lizarazu3, Jon Andoni Duñabeitia3, Nicola Molinaro4.   

Abstract

Literacy and numeracy are two fundamental cognitive skills that require mastering culturally-invented symbolic systems for representing spoken language and quantities. How numbers and words are processed in the human brain and their temporal dynamics remain unclear. Using MEG (magnetoencephalography), we find brain activation differences for literacy and numeracy from early stages of processing in the temporal-occipital and temporal-parietal regions. Native speakers of Spanish were exposed to visually presented words, pseudowords, strings of numbers, strings of letters and strings of symbols while engaged in a go/no-go task. Results showed more evoked neuromagnetic activity for words and pseudowords compared to symbols at ~120-130ms in the left occipito-temporal and temporal-parietal cortices (angular gyrus and intra-parietal sulcus) and at ~200ms in the left inferior frontal gyrus and left temporal areas. In contrast, numbers showed more activation than symbols at similar time windows in homologous regions of the right hemisphere: occipito-temporal and superior and middle temporal cortices at ~100-130ms. A direct comparison between the responses to words and numbers confirmed this distinct lateralization for the two stimulus types. These results suggest that literacy and numeracy follow distinct processing streams through the left and right hemispheres, respectively, and that the temporal-parietal and occipito-temporal regions may interact during processing alphanumeric stimuli.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26067344     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  9 in total

Review 1.  Multiple functions of the angular gyrus at high temporal resolution.

Authors:  Mohamed L Seghier
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 3.270

2.  Early top-down modulation in visual word form processing: Evidence from an intracranial SEEG study.

Authors:  Yi Liu; Gaofeng Shi; Mingyang Li; Hongbing Xing; Yan Song; Luchuan Xiao; Yuguang Guan; Zaizhu Han
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Differential contributions of the middle frontal gyrus functional connectivity to literacy and numeracy.

Authors:  Maki S Koyama; David O'Connor; Zarrar Shehzad; Michael P Milham
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Word and object recognition during reading acquisition: MEG evidence.

Authors:  Sendy Caffarra; Clara D Martin; Mikel Lizarazu; Marie Lallier; Asier Zarraga; Nicola Molinaro; Manuel Carreiras
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 6.464

5.  Identifying Dyslexia: Link between Maze Learning and Dyslexia Susceptibility Gene, DCDC2, in Young Children.

Authors:  Lisa A Gabel; Kelsey Voss; Evelyn Johnson; Esther R Lindström; Dongnhu T Truong; Erin M Murray; Karla Cariño; Christiana M Nielsen; Steven Paniagua; Jeffrey R Gruen
Journal:  Dev Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.421

6.  Causal Interactions between Frontal(θ) - Parieto-Occipital(α2) Predict Performance on a Mental Arithmetic Task.

Authors:  Stavros I Dimitriadis; Yu Sun; Nitish V Thakor; Anastasios Bezerianos
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  An EEG Study of a Confusing State Induced by Information Insufficiency during Mathematical Problem-Solving and Reasoning.

Authors:  Ye Liang; Xiaojian Liu; Lemiao Qiu; Shuyou Zhang
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-25

8.  Neural Population Dynamics and Cognitive Function.

Authors:  Stephen E Nadeau
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Delineating the cognitive-neural substrates of writing: a large scale behavioral and voxel based morphometry study.

Authors:  Haobo Chen; Xiaoping Pan; Wai-Ling Bickerton; Johnny King Lau; Jin Zhou; Beinan Zhou; Lara Harris; Pia Rotshtein
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.