| Literature DB >> 26066769 |
Hidetaka Akita1, Dai Kurihara2, Marco Schmeer3, Martin Schleef4, Hideyoshi Harashima5.
Abstract
The nuclear transfer process is one of the critical rate-limiting processes in transgene expn>ression. In the present study, we repn>ort on the effect of compn>action and the size of the DNA molecule onEntities:
Keywords: DNA; microinjection; nuclear transfer; size
Year: 2015 PMID: 26066769 PMCID: PMC4491651 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics7020064
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceutics ISSN: 1999-4923 Impact factor: 6.321
Figure 1Synchronization of HeLa cells by hydroxyurea. Cell growth (A) and cell death (B) was monitored by counting the number of HeLa cells. The cells were cultured in the presence (closed) or absence (open) of 2.5 mM of hydroxyurea. The number of dead cells was counted by staining the cells with trypan blue. Gene expression of the EGFP after the microinjection of MC07.CMV-EGFP in the nucleus (C) or cytoplasm (D) of the non-treated cells (open) or synchronized cells (closed). Data are represented as the mean ± S.D. of triplicate experiments. The statistical differences were determined by the one-way ANOVA followed by Student’s t-test (**, p < 0.01). E(nuc), transgene expression after nuclear microinjection; E(cyt), transgene expression after cytoplasmic microinjection.
Sizes of protamine/DNA complexes.
| N/P Ratio | Diameter (nm) |
|---|---|
| 0.5 | 102 ± 2 |
| 2 | 83.6 ± 12.5 |
| 10 | 72.9 ± 7.9 |
Figure 2EGFP expression after the cytoplasmic and nuclear microinjection of protamine/DNA complexes. The minicircle DNA (MC07.CMV-EGFP) was compacted with protamine at N/P ratio of 0.5, 2 and 9. One thousand copies and 10 copies of DNA were injected into the cytoplasm (A) and the nucleus (B) with 0.5% RhoDex, respectively. At 24 h post injection, the ratio of GFP-positive cells to RhoDex-positive cells was calculated. (C) The nuclear transfer (NT) scores were calculated as the percent of EGFP-expression after cytoplasmic microinjection (E(cyt)) divided by that after nuclear microinjection (E(nuc)). Vertical bars indicate the standard deviation of triplicate experiments. The statistical differences were determined by one-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls test. (*, p < 0.05).
Figure 3EGFP expression after the cytoplasmic and nuclear microinjection of naked DNA. One thousand copies and 10 copies of three types of DNAs (MC07.CMV-EGFP, pBS-EGFP and pcDNA3.1-EGFP) were injected into the cytoplasm (A) and nucleus (B) with 0.5% RhoDex. At 24 h post injection, the ratio of GFP-positive cells to RhoDex-positive cells was calculated. (C) NT scores were calculated as the percent of EGFP-expression after cytoplasmic microinjection (E(cyt)) divided by that after nuclear microinjection (E(nuc)). Vertical bars indicate the standard deviation of triplicate experiments. The statistical differences were determined by one-way ANOVA followed by the Student–Newman–Keuls test (*, p < 0.05).