Literature DB >> 26066752

The Post-Illumination Pupil Response (PIPR).

Prakash Adhikari1, Andrew J Zele1, Beatrix Feigl2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The post-illumination pupil response (PIPR) has been quantified using four metrics, but the spectral sensitivity of only one is known; here we determine the other three. To optimize the human PIPR measurement, we determine the protocol producing the largest PIPR, the duration of the PIPR, and the metric(s) with the lowest coefficient of variation.
METHODS: The consensual pupil light reflex (PLR) was measured with a Maxwellian view pupillometer. Experiment 1: Spectral sensitivity of four PIPR metrics (plateau, 6 seconds, area under curve early and late recovery) was determined from a criterion PIPR to a 1-second pulse and fitted with vitamin A1 nomogram (λ(max) = 482 nm). Experiment 2: The PLR was measured as a function of three stimulus durations (1 second, 10 seconds, 30 seconds), five irradiances spanning low to high melanopsin excitation levels (retinal irradiance: 9.8-14.8 log quanta.cm(-2).s(-1)), and two wavelengths, one with high (465 nm) and one with low (637 nm) melanopsin excitation. Intra- and interindividual coefficients of variation (CV) were calculated.
RESULTS: The melanopsin (opn4) photopigment nomogram adequately describes the spectral sensitivity of all four PIPR metrics. The PIPR amplitude was largest with 1-second short-wavelength pulses (≥ 12.8 log quanta.cm(-2).s(-1)). The plateau and 6-second PIPR showed the least intra- and interindividual CV (≤ 0.2). The maximum duration of the sustained PIPR was 83.0 ± 48.0 seconds (mean ± SD) for 1-second pulses and 180.1 ± 106.2 seconds for 30-second pulses (465 nm; 14.8 log quanta.cm(-2).s(-1)).
CONCLUSIONS: All current PIPR metrics provide a direct measure of the intrinsic melanopsin photoresponse. To measure progressive changes in melanopsin function in disease, we recommend that the PIPR be measured using short-duration pulses (e.g., ≤ 1 second) with high melanopsin excitation and analyzed with plateau and/or 6-second metrics. Our PIPR duration data provide a baseline for the selection of interstimulus intervals between consecutive pupil testing sequences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26066752     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.14-16233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  51 in total

1.  Supplemental light exposure improves sleep architecture in people with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Prakash Adhikari; Asik Pradhan; Andrew J Zele; Beatrix Feigl
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 4.280

Review 2.  Automated Pupillometry in Neurocritical Care: Research and Practice.

Authors:  Bethany L Lussier; DaiWai M Olson; Venkatesh Aiyagari
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 5.081

3.  Pupillary response abnormalities in depressive disorders.

Authors:  Scott A Laurenzo; Randy Kardon; Johannes Ledolter; Pieter Poolman; Ashley M Schumacher; James B Potash; Jan M Full; Olivia Rice; Anna Ketcham; Cole Starkey; Jess G Fiedorowicz
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.222

4.  The Melanopsin-Mediated Pupillary Light Response Is Not Changed in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

Authors:  Shakoor Ba-Ali; Rigmor Højland Jensen; Line Sofie Larsen; Henrik Lund-Andersen; Steffen Hamann
Journal:  Neuroophthalmology       Date:  2017-08-18

5.  The ipRGC-Driven Pupil Response with Light Exposure, Refractive Error, and Sleep.

Authors:  Kaleb S Abbott; Hope M Queener; Lisa A Ostrin
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Electrophysiological and pupillometric measures of inner retina function in nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  Jason C Park; Felix Y Chau; Jennifer I Lim; J Jason McAnany
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Increased sensitivity of the circadian system to light in delayed sleep-wake phase disorder.

Authors:  Lauren A Watson; Andrew J K Phillips; Ihaia T Hosken; Elise M McGlashan; Clare Anderson; Leon C Lack; Steven W Lockley; Shantha M W Rajaratnam; Sean W Cain
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  The ipRGC-driven pupil response with light exposure and refractive error in children.

Authors:  Lisa A Ostrin
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  The flicker Pupil Light Response (fPLR).

Authors:  Prakash Adhikari; Beatrix Feigl; Andrew J Zele
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 3.283

10.  Intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cell-driven pupil responses in patients with traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Jakaria Mostafa; Jason Porter; Hope M Queener; Lisa A Ostrin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.