| Literature DB >> 26066613 |
Robin M de Kruijff1, Hubert T Wolterbeek2, Antonia G Denkova3.
Abstract
This review presents an overview of the successes and challenges currently faced in alpha radionuclide therapy. Alpha particles have an advantage in killing tumour cells as compared to beta or gamma radiation due to their short penetration depth and high linear energy transfer (LET). Touching briefly on the clinical successes of radionuclides emitting only one alpha particle, the main focus of this article lies on those alpha-emitting radionuclides with multiple alpha-emitting daughters in their decay chain. While having the advantage of longer half-lives, the recoiled daughters of radionuclides like 224Ra (radium), 223Ra, and 225Ac (actinium) can do significant damage to healthy tissue when not retained at the tumour site. Three different approaches to deal with this problem are discussed: encapsulation in a nano-carrier, fast uptake of the alpha emitting radionuclides in tumour cells, and local administration. Each approach has been shown to have its advantages and disadvantages, but when larger activities need to be used clinically, nano-carriers appear to be the most promising solution for reducing toxic effects, provided there is no accumulation in healthy tissue.Entities:
Keywords: alpha-emitters; radionuclide therapy; recoils
Year: 2015 PMID: 26066613 PMCID: PMC4491664 DOI: 10.3390/ph8020321
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceuticals (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8247
Figure 1Schematic representation of a recoiling daughter radionuclide detaching from a targeting agent as a consequence of alpha decay.
Alpha radionuclides that can be used as in vivo generators and their decay characteristics [30].
| Radionuclides and Their Decay Chain | Half-Life | Decay | Eα (MeV) * | Calculated ER (keV) * |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 225 | 9.9 days ** | α(100%) | 5.8 | - |
| 221Fr | 4.9 min | α(100%) | 6.3 | 105.5 |
| 217At | 32 ms | α(99.98%)/β−(0.01%) | 7.1 | 116.9 |
| 213Bi | 45.6 min | α(2%)/β−(98%) | - | 132.8 |
| 213Po | 4.2 µs | α(100%) | 8.4 | - |
| 209Pb | 3.3 h | β− (100%) | - | 160.4 |
| 209Bi | stable | - | - | - |
| 227 | 18.7 days | α(100%) | 6 | - |
| 223 | 11.4 days | α(100%) | 5.7 | 108.4 |
| 219Rn | 4.0 s | α(100%) | 6.8 | 104.5 |
| 215Po | 1.8 ms | α(100%) | 7.4 | 126.9 |
| 211Bi | 2.2 min | α(99.7%)/β−(0.3%) | 6.6 | 140.1 |
| 207Tl | 4.8 min | β− (100%) | - | 128.1 |
| 207Pb | stable | - | - | |
| 228 | 1.9 years | α(100%) | 5.4 | - |
| 224 | 3.7 days | α(100%) | 5.7 | 96.9 |
| 220Rn | 55.6 s | α(100%) | 6.3 | 103.4 |
| 216Po | 0.15 s | α(100%) | 6.8 | 116.5 |
| 212Pb | 10.6 h | β−(100%) | - | 128 |
| 212Bi | 60.6 min | α(36%)/β−(64%) | 6.1/- | - |
| 208Tl/212Po | 3.0 min/0.3 µs | β−(100%)/α(100%) | -/8.8 | 116.5/- |
| 208Pb | stable | - | - | - |
| 230 | 20.8 days | α(100%) | 5.9 | - |
| 226 | 31 min | α(100%) | 6.3 | 104.3 |
| 222Ra | 38 s | α(100%) | 6.5 | 114.2 |
| 218Rn | 35 ms | α(100%) | 7.1 | 120.4 |
| 214Po | 164 µs | α(100%) | 7.7 | 133.4 |
| 210Pb | 22.3 years | β−(100%) | 146.5 | |
| 210Bi | 5.0 days | β−(100%) | - | |
| 210Po | 138.4 days | α(100%) | 5.3 | - |
| 206Pb | stable | - |
* The alpha and recoil energies have been rounded up;** this value is from Pommé et al. [31].
Major targeted organs based on 24 h distribution after intravenous injection (IV).
| Element | Major Targeted Organs * |
|---|---|
| Francium | primarily kidneys [ |
| Bismuth | 30% urine, 40% kidney, 30% other organs [ |
| Radium | 25% bone surface, 45% soft tissue, 30% excreted via large intestine [ |
| Radon | soft tissue to blood: 100 day−1, exhaled 1 min−1, bone to blood: 0.36 d−1 [ |
| Lead | 55% blood, 15% liver, 10%–15% skeleton, kidneys 4% after 1 day [ |
| Polonium | 28% liver, 28% kidneys, 10% red bone marrow, 5% spleen [ |