Literature DB >> 26066203

Incorporating pushing in exclusion-process models of cell migration.

Christian A Yates1, Andrew Parker2, Ruth E Baker2.   

Abstract

The macroscale movement behavior of a wide range of isolated migrating cells has been well characterized experimentally. Recently, attention has turned to understanding the behavior of cells in crowded environments. In such scenarios it is possible for cells to interact, inducing neighboring cells to move in order to make room for their own movements or progeny. Although the behavior of interacting cells has been modeled extensively through volume-exclusion processes, few models, thus far, have explicitly accounted for the ability of cells to actively displace each other in order to create space for themselves. In this work we consider both on- and off-lattice volume-exclusion position-jump processes in which cells are explicitly allowed to induce movements in their near neighbors in order to create space for themselves to move or proliferate into. We refer to this behavior as pushing. From these simple individual-level representations we derive continuum partial differential equations for the average occupancy of the domain. We find that, for limited amounts of pushing, comparison between the averaged individual-level simulations and the population-level model is nearly as good as in the scenario without pushing. Interestingly, we find that, in the on-lattice case, the diffusion coefficient of the population-level model is increased by pushing, whereas, for the particular off-lattice model that we investigate, the diffusion coefficient is reduced. We conclude, therefore, that it is important to consider carefully the appropriate individual-level model to use when representing complex cell-cell interactions such as pushing.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26066203     DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.91.052711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys        ISSN: 1539-3755


  5 in total

1.  Interpreting how nonlinear diffusion affects the fate of bistable populations using a discrete modelling framework.

Authors:  Yifei Li; Pascal R Buenzli; Matthew J Simpson
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.213

Review 2.  Multidisciplinary approaches to understanding collective cell migration in developmental biology.

Authors:  Linus J Schumacher; Paul M Kulesa; Rebecca McLennan; Ruth E Baker; Philip K Maini
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 6.411

3.  Comparing individual-based approaches to modelling the self-organization of multicellular tissues.

Authors:  James M Osborne; Alexander G Fletcher; Joe M Pitt-Francis; Philip K Maini; David J Gavaghan
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Distinguishing cell shoving mechanisms.

Authors:  Pingyu Nan; Darragh M Walsh; Kerry A Landman; Barry D Hughes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Close Encounters of the Cell Kind: The Impact of Contact Inhibition on Tumour Growth and Cancer Models.

Authors:  David Robert Grimes; Alexander G Fletcher
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 1.758

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.