| Literature DB >> 26066011 |
Robert J Volk1, Gianna T Kinsman, Yen-Chi L Le, Paul Swank, Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby, Stephanie L McFall, Theresa L Byrd, Patricia Dolan Mullen, Scott B Cantor.
Abstract
Active surveillance is increasingly recognized as a reasonable option for men with low-risk, localized prostate cancer, yet few men who might benefit from conservative management receive it. The authors examined the acceptability of normative messages about active surveillance as a management option for patients with low-risk prostate cancer. Men with a diagnosis of localized prostate cancer who were recruited through prostate cancer support organizations completed a web-based survey (N = 331). They rated messages about active surveillance for believability, accuracy, and importance for men to hear when making treatment decisions. The message "You don't have to panic … you have time to think about your options" was perceived as believable, accurate, and important by more than 80% of the survivors. In contrast, messages about trust in the active surveillance protocol and "knowing in plenty of time" if treatment is needed were rated as accurate by only about 36% of respondents. For active surveillance to be viewed as a reasonable alternative, men will need reassurance that following an active surveillance protocol is likely to allow time for curative treatment if the cancer progresses.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26066011 PMCID: PMC4784693 DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1018618
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Health Commun ISSN: 1081-0730