Literature DB >> 26065984

Vasa Vasorum Restructuring in Human Atherosclerotic Plaque Vulnerability: A Clinical Optical Coherence Tomography Study.

Akira Taruya1, Atsushi Tanaka2, Tsuyoshi Nishiguchi1, Yoshiki Matsuo1, Yuichi Ozaki1, Manabu Kashiwagi1, Yasutsugu Shiono1, Makoto Orii1, Takashi Yamano1, Yasushi Ino1, Kumiko Hirata1, Takashi Kubo1, Takashi Akasaka1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that vasa vasorum (VV) is associated with plaque progression and vulnerability.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between coronary neovascularization structures and plaque characteristics.
METHODS: We included 53 patients who underwent optical coherence tomography to observe the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery. Patients were classified into 5 groups according to lesion characteristics: normal; fibrous plaque (FP); fibroatheroma (FA); plaque rupture (PR); and fibrocalcific plaque (FC). We defined signal-poor tubuloluminal structures recognized in cross-sectional and longitudinal profiles located in adventitial layer as VV, and within plaque as intraplaque neovessels. Two types of longitudinal microvascular structure (external running and internal running) and a particular type of intraplaque neovessels (a coral tree pattern) were noted. All VV and intraplaque neovessels were manually segmented followed by quantification with Simpson method.
RESULTS: Among the groups, there was significant difference (expressed as median [interquartile range (IQR)]) in VV volume (normal: 0.329 [IQR: 0.209 to 0.361] mm(3), FP: 0.433 [IQR: 0.297 to 0.706] mm(3), FA: 0.288 [IQR: 0.113 to 0.364] mm(3), PR: 0.160 [IQR: 0.141 to 0.193] mm(3), and FC: 0.106 [IQR: 0.053 to 0.165] mm(3); p = 0.003) and intraplaque neovessels volume (normal: 0.00 [IQR: 0.00 to 0.00] mm(3), FP: 0.00 [IQR: 0.00 to 0.00] mm(3), FA: 0.028 [IQR: 0.019 to 0.041] mm(3), PR: 0.035 [IQR: 0.026 to 0.042] mm(3), and FC: 0.010 [IQR: 0.005 to 0.014] mm(3); p < 0.001). Significant differences were observed in the prevalence of the internal running (normal: 0.0%, FP: 28.6%, FA: 40.0%, PR: 70.0%, and FC: 40.0%; p = 0.032) and the coral tree pattern (normal: 0.0%, FP: 7.1%, FA: 40.0%, PR: 80.0%, and FC: 10.0%; p < 0.01). The VV volume correlated with fibrous plaque volume (r = 0.71; p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: VV increase with fibrous plaque volume and intraplaque neovessels with particular structures are associated with plaque vulnerability. Imaging for microvasculature could become a new window for plaque vulnerability.
Copyright © 2015 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  optical coherence tomography; plaque progression; plaque rupture; vasa vasorum; vulnerable plaque

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26065984     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.04.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  23 in total

Review 1.  Imaging the event-prone coronary artery plaque.

Authors:  Andreas A Giannopoulos; Dominik C Benz; Christoph Gräni; Ronny R Buechel
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Intravascular optical coherence tomography [Invited].

Authors:  Brett E Bouma; Martin Villiger; Kenichiro Otsuka; Wang-Yuhl Oh
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 3.  Vasa vasorum: an old term with new problems.

Authors:  Vladimir Musil; Josef Sach; David Kachlik; Matej Patzelt; Josef Stingl
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Long-term darapladib use does not affect coronary plaque composition assessed using multimodality intravascular imaging modalities: a randomized-controlled study.

Authors:  Woong Gil Choi; Megha Prasad; Ryan Lennon; Rajiv Gulati; Abhiram Prasad; Lilach O Lerman; Amir Lerman
Journal:  Coron Artery Dis       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.439

Review 5.  The Role of Intracoronary Plaque Imaging with Intravascular Ultrasound, Optical Coherence Tomography, and Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Vu Hoang; Jill Grounds; Don Pham; Salim Virani; Ihab Hamzeh; Athar Mahmood Qureshi; Nasser Lakkis; Mahboob Alam
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 6.  Viewpoint: Recent Advances in Intracoronary Imaging for Vasa Vasorum Visualisation.

Authors:  Kensuke Nishimiya; Yasuharu Matsumoto; Hiroaki Shimokawa
Journal:  Eur Cardiol       Date:  2017-12

7.  Dual-modality Imaging of Angiogenesis in Unstable Atherosclerotic Plaques with VEGFR2-Targeted Upconversion Nanoprobes in vivo.

Authors:  Yan Fang; Ruichen Yang; Yi Hou; Yabin Wang; Ning Yang; Mengqi Xu; Sulei Li; Shan Gao; Min Jiang; Jingyang Fan; Yazhuo Hu; Zhenzhen Xu; Lei Gao; Feng Cao
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 3.484

8.  Validation of Ultrasound Super-Resolution Imaging of Vasa Vasorum in Rabbit Atherosclerotic Plaques.

Authors:  Qiyang Chen; Jaesok Yu; Lyudmila Lukashova; Joseph D Latoche; Jianhui Zhu; Linda Lavery; Konstantinos Verdelis; Carolyn J Anderson; Kang Kim
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  Response to: effect of vasa vasorum in cerebrovascular compensation: 2 case reports.

Authors:  Long Li; Adam A Dmytriw; Liqun Jiao
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-06

10.  Stenting-induced Vasa Vasorum compression and subsequent flow resistance: a finite element study.

Authors:  Andrea Corti; Annalisa De Paolis; John Tarbell; Luis Cardoso
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2020-08-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.