Literature DB >> 26065728

Temporal patterns of Campylobacter contamination on chicken and their relationship to campylobacteriosis cases in the United States.

Michael S Williams1, Neal J Golden2, Eric D Ebel2, Emily T Crarey3, Heather P Tate3.   

Abstract

The proportion of Campylobacter contaminated food and water samples collected by different surveillance systems often exhibit seasonal patterns. In addition, the incidence of foodborne campylobacteriosis also tends to exhibit strong seasonal patterns. Of the various product classes, the occurrence of Campylobacter contamination can be high on raw poultry products, and chicken is often thought to be one of the leading food vehicles for campylobacteriosis. Two different federal agencies in the United States collected samples of raw chicken products and tested them for the presence of Campylobacter. During the same time period, a consortium of federal and state agencies operated a nationwide surveillance system to monitor cases of campylobacteriosis in the United States. This study uses a common modeling approach to estimate trends and seasonal patterns in both the proportion of raw chicken product samples that test positive for Campylobacter and cases of campylobacteriosis. The results generally support the hypothesis of a weak seasonal increase in the proportion of Campylobacter positive chicken samples in the summer months, though the number of Campylobacter on test-positive samples is slightly lower during this time period. In contrast, campylobacteriosis cases exhibit a strong seasonal pattern that generally precedes increases in contaminated raw chicken. These results suggest that while contaminated chicken products may be responsible for a substantial number of campylobacteriosis cases, they are most likely not the primary driver of the seasonal pattern in human illness. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Campylobacteriosis; Retail chicken; Seasonality; Times series

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26065728     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.05.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol        ISSN: 0168-1605            Impact factor:   5.277


  8 in total

Review 1.  The Data Behind Risk Analysis of Campylobacter Jejuni and Campylobacter Coli Infections.

Authors:  Racem Ben Romdhane; Roswitha Merle
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.291

2.  Whole-Genome Sequence of Multidrug-Resistant Campylobacter coli Strain COL B1-266, Isolated from the Colombian Poultry Chain.

Authors:  Johan F Bernal; Pilar Donado-Godoy; Alejandra Arévalo; Carolina Duarte; María E Realpe; Paula L Díaz; Yolanda Gómez; Fernando Rodríguez; Richa Agarwala; David Landsman; Leonardo Mariño-Ramírez
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2016-03-17

Review 3.  A Review of the Effect of Management Practices on Campylobacter Prevalence in Poultry Farms.

Authors:  Nompilo Sibanda; Aaron McKenna; Anne Richmond; Steven C Ricke; Todd Callaway; Alexandros Ch Stratakos; Ozan Gundogdu; Nicolae Corcionivoschi
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Seasonal synchronization of foodborne outbreaks in the United States, 1996-2017.

Authors:  Ryan B Simpson; Bingjie Zhou; Elena N Naumova
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Do contamination of and exposure to chicken meat and water drive the temporal dynamics of Campylobacter cases?

Authors:  J M David; F Pollari; K D M Pintar; A Nesbitt; A J Butler; A Ravel
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 4.434

6.  Climate, human behaviour or environment: individual-based modelling of Campylobacter seasonality and strategies to reduce disease burden.

Authors:  Stephen P Rushton; Roy A Sanderson; Peter J Diggle; Mark D F Shirley; Alasdair P Blain; Iain Lake; James A Maas; William D K Reid; Jo Hardstaff; Nicola Williams; Natalia R Jones; Daniel Rigby; Norval J C Strachan; Ken J Forbes; Paul R Hunter; Thomas J Humphrey; Sarah J O'Brien
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 5.531

7.  Prevalence and risk factors associated with Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella enterica in livestock raised on diversified small-scale farms in California.

Authors:  A F A Pires; L Patterson; E A Kukielka; P Aminabadi; N Navarro-Gonzalez; M T Jay-Russell
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 2.451

8.  An analecta of visualizations for foodborne illness trends and seasonality.

Authors:  Ryan B Simpson; Bingjie Zhou; Tania M Alarcon Falconi; Elena N Naumova
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 6.444

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.