| Literature DB >> 26064562 |
Nathan D Burkett-Cadena1, Andrea M Bingham1, Thomas R Unnasch1.
Abstract
Prevalence of arthropod-borne parasites often differs drastically between host sexes. This sex-related disparity may be related to physiological (primarily hormonal) differences that facilitate or suppress replication of the pathogen in host tissues. Alternately, differences in pathogen prevalence between host sexes may be owing to differential exposure to infected vectors. Here, we report on the use of PCR-based assays recognizing bird sex chromosomes to investigate sex-related patterns of avian host use from field-collected female mosquitoes from Florida, USA. Mosquitoes took more bloodmeals from male birds (64.0% of 308 sexed samples) than female birds (36.0%), deviating significantly from a hypothetical 1:1 sex ratio. In addition, male-biased host use was consistent across mosquito species (Culex erraticus (64.4%); Culex nigripalpus (61.0%) and Culiseta melanura (64.9%)). Our findings support the hypothesis that sex-biased exposure to vector-borne pathogens contributes to disparities in parasite/pathogen prevalence between the sexes. While few studies have yet to investigate sex-biased host use by mosquitoes, the methods used here could be applied to a variety of mosquito-borne disease systems, including those that affect health of humans, domestic animals and wildlife. Understanding the mechanisms that drive sex-based disparities in host use may lead to novel strategies for interrupting pathogen/parasite transmission.Entities:
Keywords: disease ecology; infection prevalence; parasite–host interaction; sex-bias
Year: 2014 PMID: 26064562 PMCID: PMC4448840 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.140262
Source DB: PubMed Journal: R Soc Open Sci ISSN: 2054-5703 Impact factor: 2.963
Host use and sex determination of female mosquitoes from field sites in Florida, USA (2011–2013) determined through PCR assays targeting the cytochrome b gene (host species) and CHD gene (avian sex).
| total mealsa | avian-derived meals | avian sex determined | avian sex negativeb | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mosquito | % | % | % | ||||
| 22 | 3 | 13.6 | 3 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.0 | |
| 7 | 1 | 14.3 | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 100.0 | |
| 34 | 3 | 8.8 | 2 | 66.7 | 1 | 33.3 | |
| 60 | 52 | 86.7 | 37 | 71.2 | 15 | 28.8 | |
| 500 | 300 | 60.0 | 236 | 78.7 | 64 | 21.3 | |
| 40 | 29 | 72.5 | 23 | 79.3 | 6 | 20.7 | |
| 7 | 5 | 71.4 | 4 | 80.0 | 1 | 20.0 | |
| 1 | 1 | 100.0 | 1 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.0 | |
| 31 | 2 | 6.5 | 1 | 50.0 | 1 | 50.0 | |
| 2 | 2 | 100.0 | 1 | 50.0 | 1 | 50.0 | |
aIncludes all identified feedings (birds, mammals, reptiles and amphibians).
bSex could not be determined, based on the procedures used (no amplification).
Figure 1.Agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide showing sex determination of avian hosts from field-captured, blood-fed mosquitoes. Lanes: 1 and 16, ladder; 14, positive control; 15, negative control; YCNH, yellow-crowned night heron; BCNH, black-crowned night heron; GBHE, great blue heron; ANHI, anhinga; WOST, wood stork; GREG, great egret; AMBI, American bittern; GRHE, green heron.
Figure 2.Sex-biased avian host use by mosquitoes from wetlands in Hillsborough County, FL, USA, December–February 2012–2013.
Gender (F, female, M, male) of avian hosts from three mosquito species (Culiseta melanura, Culex erraticus and Culex nigripalpus) from field sites in Florida, USA, as determined by PCR.
| total | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| bird | total | F | M | F | M | F | M | F | M |
| American bittern ( | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| anhinga ( | 38 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 27 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 31 |
| black-crowned night heron ( | 90 | 5 | 3 | 38 | 43 | 1 | 0 | 44 | 46 |
| great blue heron ( | 28 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 14 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 18 |
| great egret ( | 20 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 13 |
| green heron ( | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 |
| limpkin ( | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| little blue heron ( | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Muscovy duck ( | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| northern cardinal ( | 10 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
| pied-billed grebe ( | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Tennessee warbler ( | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| turkey vulture ( | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| wood stork ( | 29 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 21 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 24 |
| yellow-crowned night heron ( | 37 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 23 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 24 |
| othersa | 12 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 8 |
aSingle individuals of black vulture, Coragyps atratus (male); Carolina wren (male); great horned owl, Strix varia (male); hermit thrush (male); house wren, Troglodytes aedon (male); loggerhead shrike, Lanius ludovicianus (male); mourning dove, Zenaida macroura (female); osprey, Pandion haliaetus (male); tufted titmouse, Baeolophus bicolor (female); white ibis, Eudocimus albus (female); wild turkey, Meleagris gallopavo (male); Wilson's snipe, Gallinago delicata (female).