Literature DB >> 26064249

Longitudinal analysis of meta-analysis literatures in the database of ISI Web of Science.

Changtai Zhu1, Ting Jiang2, Hao Cao3, Wenguang Sun4, Zhong Chen5, Jinming Liu6.   

Abstract

The meta-analysis is regarded as an important evidence for making scientific decision. The database of ISI Web of Science collected a great number of high quality literatures including meta-analysis literatures. However, it is significant to understand the general characteristics of meta-analysis literatures to outline the perspective of meta-analysis. In this present study, we summarized and clarified some features on these literatures in the database of ISI Web of Science. We retrieved the meta-analysis literatures in the database of ISI Web of Science including SCI-E, SSCI, A&HCI, CPCI-S, CPCI-SSH, CCR-E, and IC. The annual growth rate, literature category, language, funding, index citation, agencies and countries/territories of the meta-analysis literatures were analyzed, respectively. A total of 95,719 records, which account for 0.38% (99% CI: 0.38%-0.39%) of all literatures, were found in the database. From 1997 to 2012, the annual growth rate of meta-analysis literatures was 18.18%. The literatures involved in many categories, languages, fundings, citations, publication agencies, and countries/territories. Interestingly, the index citation frequencies of the meta-analysis were significantly higher than that of other type literatures such as multi-centre study, randomize controlled trial, cohort study, case control study, and cases report (P<0.0001). The increasing numbers, intensively global influence and high citations revealed that the meta-analysis has been becoming more and more prominent in recent years. In future, in order to promote the validity of meta-analysis, the CONSORT and PRISMA standard should be continuously popularized in the field of evidence-based medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Meta-analysis; Web of Science; databases

Year:  2015        PMID: 26064249      PMCID: PMC4443083     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med        ISSN: 1940-5901


  33 in total

Review 1.  Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses.

Authors:  D Moher; D J Cook; S Eastwood; I Olkin; D Rennie; D F Stroup
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-11-27       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems.

Authors:  Camille Parmesan; Gary Yohe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-01-02       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson; Jonathan J Deeks; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-09-06

Review 5.  Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials.

Authors:  M Clarke; R Collins; S Darby; C Davies; P Elphinstone; V Evans; J Godwin; R Gray; C Hicks; S James; E MacKinnon; P McGale; T McHugh; R Peto; C Taylor; Y Wang
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005-12-17       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  [The PRISMA Statement - what should be reported about systematic reviews?].

Authors:  Gerd Antes; E von Elm
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  2009-07-31       Impact factor: 0.628

7.  How to report randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement.

Authors:  D Rennie
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-08-28       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  An assessment of the quality of rotator cuff randomized controlled trials: utilizing the Jadad score and CONSORT criteria.

Authors:  Frank McCormick; Gregory L Cvetanovich; Jaehon M Kim; Joshua D Harris; Anil K Gupta; Geoff D Abrams; Anthony A Romeo; Matthew T Provencher
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 9.  Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group.

Authors:  D F Stroup; J A Berlin; S C Morton; I Olkin; G D Williamson; D Rennie; D Moher; B J Becker; T A Sipe; S B Thacker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-04-19       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  The European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing endorses the CONSORT statement and extension.

Authors:  Tiny Jaarsma; Bengt Fridlund; Anna Stromberg; David R Thompson
Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.908

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Studies on Children With Developmental Coordination Disorder in the Past 20 Years: A Bibliometric Analysis via CiteSpace.

Authors:  Mei-Qin Wu; De-Qing Wu; Chun-Ping Hu; Lai-Sang Iao
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 4.157

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.