| Literature DB >> 26064170 |
Vânia Ortega Gutierres1, Michel Leandro Campos2, Carlos Alberto Arcaro1, Renata Pires Assis1, Helen Mariana Baldan-Cimatti2, Rosângela Gonçalves Peccinini2, Silvia Paula-Gomes3, Isis Carmo Kettelhut3, Amanda Martins Baviera1, Iguatemy Lourenço Brunetti1.
Abstract
This study measures the curcumin concentration in rat plasma by liquid chromatography and investigates the changes in the glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity of streptozotocin-diabetic rats treated with curcumin-enriched yoghurt. The analytical method for curcumin detection was linear from 10 to 500 ng/mL. The C max and the time to reach C max (t max) of curcumin in plasma were 3.14 ± 0.9 μg/mL and 5 minutes (10 mg/kg, i.v.) and 0.06 ± 0.01 μg/mL and 14 minutes (500 mg/kg, p.o.). The elimination half-time was 8.64 ± 2.31 (i.v.) and 32.70 ± 12.92 (p.o.) minutes. The oral bioavailability was about 0.47%. Changes in the glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity were investigated in four groups: normal and diabetic rats treated with yoghurt (NYOG and DYOG, resp.) and treated with 90 mg/kg/day curcumin incorporated in yoghurt (NC90 and DC90, resp.). After 15 days of treatment, the glucose tolerance and the insulin sensitivity were significantly improved in DC90 rats in comparison with DYOG, which can be associated with an increase in the AKT phosphorylation levels and GLUT4 translocation in skeletal muscles. These findings can explain, at least in part, the benefits of curcumin-enriched yoghurt to diabetes and substantiate evidences for the curcumin metabolite(s) as being responsible for the antidiabetic activity.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26064170 PMCID: PMC4433689 DOI: 10.1155/2015/678218
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Chromatogram of plasma analysis containing 25 ng/mL curcumin and IS (5.3 μg/mL dinitrophenol) at 420 nm and the linearity of the bioanalytical method.
Intraday (n = 5) and interday (n = 5) accuracy and precision of the bioanalytical method to quantify curcumin in plasma.
| Nominal concentration (ng/mL) | Accuracy (%) | Precision CV (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Intraday | ||
| 10 | 113.59 | 13.52 |
| 25 | 86.05 | 11.03 |
| 125 | 92.40 | 2.67 |
| 400 | 112.88 | 8.68 |
| Interday | ||
| 10 | 89.65 | 7.58 |
| 25 | 91.85 | 12.46 |
| 125 | 94.52 | 8.57 |
| 400 | 98.74 | 9.62 |
Stability of curcumin in plasma under different conditions of storage, temperature, and time intervals (n = 3).
| Sample condition | Curcumin nominal concentration | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 ng/mL | 400 ng/mL | |||
| Accuracy (%) | Precision CV (%) | Accuracy (%) | Precision CV (%) | |
|
| 91.85 | 8.90 | 105.90 | 12.50 |
|
| 88.45 | 7.50 | 101.56 | 13.40 |
|
| 89.34 | 5.40 | 99.47 | 11.60 |
|
| 90.77 | 6.20 | 103.24 | 8.90 |
Figure 2Plasma curcumin concentrations versus time curves in STZ-diabetic rats. Values are expressed as means ± SEM.
Rat plasma/serum levels of curcumin administered in different vehicles.
| Animal | Administration | Curcumin (g/kg) | Vehicle |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diabetic rat# | Oral | 0.50 | Curcumin-enriched yoghurt (0.5 mL) | 0.060 | 0.25 |
| Diabetic rat# | Intravenous | 0.01 | Curcumin in DMSO (0.5 mL/kg) | 3.140 | 0.08 |
|
Normal rat [ | Oral | 0.10 | Curcumin powder | 0.084 | 2.00 |
| Normal rat [ | Oral | 0.10 | Marketed CUR-500 capsules | 0.092 | 2.00 |
| Normal rat [ | Oral | 0.10 | Curcumin nanocrystal-loaded capsules | 0.041 | 0.50 |
| Normal rat [ | Oral | 0.05 | Curcumin aqueous suspension | 0.004 | 0.50 |
| Normal rat [ | Oral | 0.05 | Curcumin-loaded PLGA nanoparticles | 0.011 | 2.00 |
| Normal rat [ | Oral | 0.05 | Curcumin-loaded PLGA-PEG blend nanoparticles | 0.029 | 3.00 |
| Normal rat [ | Oral | 0.10 | Curcumin nanoparticles | 0.260 | 2.00 |
| Normal rat [ | Oral | 0.25 | Curcumin + piperine (0.01 g/kg) water suspension | 0.121 | 0.75 |
| Normal rat [ | Oral | 0.25 | Curcumin suspension | 0.090 | 0.50 |
| Normal rat [ | Oral | 0.10 | Curcumin liposome dissolved in saline | 0.042 | 0.30 |
| Normal rat [ | Oral | 0.05 | Curcumin solubilized in Tween 80 | 292.000 | 0.25 |
| Normal rat [ | Oral | 0.05 | Curcumin loaded solid lipid nanoparticles | 14.290 | 0.50 |
| Normal rat [ | Oral | 0.50 | ∗ | 0.060 | 0.68 |
| Normal rat [ | Intravenous | 0.01 | ∗ | 0.360 | ∗ |
| Normal rat [ | Oral | 1.00 | Curcumin phospholipid complex | 1.200 | 1.50 |
| Normal rat [ | Oral | 1.00 | ∗ | 0.500 | 0.75 |
| Normal rat [ | Oral | 0.34 | Curcumin phospholipid complex | 0.012 | 0.25 |
| Normal rat [ | Oral | 0.34 | Curcumin unformulated | 0.002 | 0.50 |
| Normal rat [ | Oral | 0.30 | Curcumin phospholipid complex | 0.600 | 2.33 |
| Normal rat [ | Oral | 0.10 | ∗ | 0.266 | 1.62 |
| Normal rat [ | Oral | 2.00 | Curcumin + piperine (0.02 g/kg) water suspension | 1.800 | 1.29 |
| Normal rat [ | Oral | 2.00 | Curcumin aqueous suspension | 1.350 | 0.83 |
#This study.
∗Not reported. C max: peak plasma/serum concentration; t max: time to reach peak plasma/serum concentration.
Pharmacokinetic parameters after oral (500 mg/kg) and i.v. administration (10 mg/kg) of curcumin to STZ-diabetic rats. Values are expressed as means ± SEM (n = 5).
| Pharmacokinetic parameters | Administration route | |
|---|---|---|
| Oral | i.v. | |
|
| 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.08 ± 0.02 |
| Half-life (min) | 32.70 ± 12.92 | 8.64 ± 2.31 |
| AUC0- | 1.89 ± 0.25 | 12.27 ± 2.75 |
| AUC0- | 2.97 ± 0.79 | 12.45 ± 2.72 |
| Cl (L/kg/min) | 0.85 ± 0.24 | 0.83 ± 0.19 |
|
| 37.49 ± 10.46 | 10.63 ± 4.10 |
| MRT (min) | 55.41 ± 20.19 | 12.46 ± 3.34 |
|
| 0.29 ± 0.15 | — |
|
| 0.06 ± 0.01 | 3.14 ± 0.90 |
|
| 15.00 ± 0.00 | 5.00 ± 0.00 |
|
| 0.47 ± 0.12 | 100 |
k el: elimination constant; half-life: time half-life; AUC0-: area under plasma concentration/time plot until the last quantifiable value; AUC0-: area under plasma concentration/time plot extrapolated to infinity; Cl: clearance; V : volume of distribution; MRT: average mean residence time; k : absorption constant; C max: maximum concentration; t max: time to reach C max; F: bioavailability.
Figure 3Oral glucose tolerance of normal and STZ-diabetic rats treated with curcumin incorporated in yoghurt. Glycemia levels before (t = 0) and after glucose overload in rats treated for 1 day ((a) diabetic; (b) normal) and for 15 days ((c) diabetic; (d) normal) with curcumin. The insets represent the AUC values (g/dL/120 min). Values are expressed as means ± SEM, n = 7-8 per group. Differences between groups were analyzed with one-way ANOVA followed by Student-Newman-Keuls test (P < 0.05). #: differences with NYOG and NC90; ∗: differences with DYOG.
Figure 4Insulin sensitivity of normal and STZ-diabetic rats treated with curcumin incorporated in yoghurt. Glycemia levels after insulin administration in rats treated for 1 day ((a) diabetic; (b) normal) and for 15 days ((c) diabetic; (d) normal) with curcumin. The inserted table shows the k itt values (%/min), which were calculated as percentage of the respective control group (DYOG or NYOG). Values are expressed as means ± SEM, n = 7-8 per group. Differences between groups were analyzed with one-way ANOVA followed by Student-Newman-Keuls test (P < 0.05). ∗: differences with DYOG.
Figure 5AKT activation (a) and plasma membrane GLUT4 content (b) in gastrocnemius muscles of normal and STZ-diabetic rats treated with curcumin incorporated in yoghurt for 15 days. AKT activation was evaluated as phosphorylation levels in Ser-473 residues. Results are expressed as means ± SEM of the arbitrary units, n = 5-6 per group. Differences between groups were analyzed with one-way ANOVA followed by Student-Newman-Keuls test. # (P < 0.05): differences with NYOG and NC90; ∗ (P < 0.05) and ∗∗ (P < 0.01): differences with DYOG; Φ (P < 0.05): differences between DC90 and NC90.