| Literature DB >> 26064122 |
Fatih Mehmet Goktas1, Bilgesu Sahin1, Sibel Yigitarslan1.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to produce hand sterilizing liquid and wet wipes with the extracts of Calendula officinalis. Since this plant has well known antimicrobial activity due to its phytochemical constituents, the increase in the extraction yield was chosen as the principle part of the production process. To achieve the maximum yield, parameters of solid-to-liquid ratio, extraction temperature, and time were studied. The optimum conditions were determined by response surface methodology as 41°C, 7 h, and 3.3 g/200 mL for temperature, time, and solid-to-liquid ratio, respectively. The yield achieved at those conditions was found to be 90 percent. The highest amounts of flavonoids were detected at optimum, whereas the highest triterpene and saponin constituents were determined at different design points. The microbial efficiencies of extracts were determined by the inhibition of the growth of selected microorganisms. Different dilution rates and interaction times were used as parameters of inhibition. Not any of the constituent but symbiotic relation in-between reached the highest inhibition of 90 percent. The pH values of the extracts were 5.1 to 5.4. As a result, the extraction of Calendula officinalis at the optimum conditions can be used effectively in the production of wet wipes and hand sterilizing liquid.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26064122 PMCID: PMC4439610 DOI: 10.1155/2015/789732
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Anal Chem ISSN: 1687-8760 Impact factor: 1.885
Experimental ranges and levels of the independent variables.
| Variables | Range and level | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | 0 | +1 | |
| Extraction temperature, °C ( | 25 | 37.5 | 50 |
| Solid/liquid ratio, g/200 mL ( | 3.3 | 10.0 | 16.5 |
| Extraction time, h ( | 1 | 4 | 7 |
The coded variables and experimental yield values in the study.
| Run |
|
|
| Yield (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | −1 | 1 | 0 | 59.75 |
| 2 | −1 | 0 | 1 | 51.45 |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 64.94 |
| 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 66.98 |
| 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 80.45 |
| 6 | 0 | −1 | 1 | 89.29 |
| 7 | 0 | 1 | −1 | 48.62 |
| 8 | −1 | −1 | 0 | 64.20 |
| 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 64.15 |
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 64.31 |
| 11 | 1 | −1 | 0 | 75.12 |
| 12 | −1 | 0 | −1 | 50.65 |
| 13 | 1 | 0 | −1 | 68.10 |
| 14 | 0 | −1 | −1 | 80.07 |
| 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 64.69 |
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the reduced cubic model.
| Source | Sum of | df | Mean |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 1837.83 | 12 | 153.15 | 1521.89 | 0.0007 |
|
| |||||
|
| 539.40 | 1 | 539.40 | 5360.06 | 0.0002 |
|
| 722.53 | 1 | 722.53 | 7179.87 | 0.0001 |
|
| 190.16 | 1 | 190.16 | 1889.67 | 0.0005 |
|
| 10.63 | 1 | 10.63 | 105.61 | 0.0093 |
|
| 33.35 | 1 | 33.35 | 331.41 | 0.0030 |
|
| 20.88 | 1 | 20.88 | 207.53 | 0.0048 |
|
| 50.81 | 1 | 50.81 | 504.90 | 0.0020 |
|
| 87.50 | 1 | 87.50 | 869.45 | 0.0011 |
|
| 10.99 | 1 | 10.99 | 109.23 | 0.0090 |
|
| 183.74 | 1 | 183.74 | 1825.88 | 0.0005 |
|
| 26.03 | 1 | 26.03 | 258.64 | 0.0038 |
|
| 121.13 | 1 | 121.13 | 1203.72 | 0.0008 |
|
| |||||
| Pure error | 0.20 | 2 | 0.10 | ||
|
| |||||
| Cor total | 1838.03 | 14 | |||
∗ R-squared = 0.9999; adjusted R-squared = 0.9992; Std. Dev. = 0.32.
Figure 1Comparison of predicted and actual values of the study.
Figure 2Three-dimensional response surfaces of the effective parameters on the extraction process.
Figure 3Microbial growth in different extracts added to liquid mediums.