| Literature DB >> 26063965 |
Nawel Yagoubi1, Yosra Jomni1, Mohsen Sakly1.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to characterize a novel animal model hyperthermia-induced febrile seizure and to investigate the impacts of repetitive febrile seizures on spatial learning and memory performances in immature rats. Methods. Rats were subjected to hyperthermia exposure one, two, or three times in 10-day intervals during 30 min in a water bath warmed at 45-50°C and their behaviour was monitored. Morris water maze spatial learning and memory were examined for control and treated groups. Results showed that rats subjected to 30-minute hyperthermia hot water developed rapidly myoclonic jerks and then generalized seizures. After a single hyperthermia exposure, the time for generalised tonic-clonic seizures appearance was 16.08 ± 0.60 min and it decreased gradually with repetitive exposure to reach 12.46 ± 0.39 min by the third exposure. Febrile seizures altered the spatial learning and memory abilities in Morris water maze and increased the time spent to attain the platform after one or two exposures, while after a third exposure rats exhibited the same latency compared to controls. Similar results were obtained in probe test where rats, subjected to hyperthermia for one or two episodes, spent less time in the target quadrant compared to corresponding controls. Further, when platform was moved from northwest to southwest quadrant, memory transfer test indicated that after one or two hyperthermia exposures cognitive performances were slightly altered, while after a third exposure the latency to escape increased significantly compared to untreated group. It was concluded that 30 min of hyperthermia hot water was sufficient to induce febrile seizures in immature rats and an increase of susceptibility was observed with repetitive hyperthermia exposure. Hyperthermia treatment impaired cognitive performances but the effects were mostly transient and moderate.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26063965 PMCID: PMC4430674 DOI: 10.1155/2015/924303
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Behav Neurol ISSN: 0953-4180 Impact factor: 3.342
Figure 1Treatment and behavioural testing protocol for treated group 1 (Tr1). The same procedure was applied for treated 2 and 3 groups. P11: postnatal day 11; FS: febrile seizure; NW: northwest; SW: southwest.
Figure 2Myoclonic jerks appearance time (MJAT), generalised tonic-clonic seizure appearance time (GTCSAT), and recovery time (RT) after a first exposure (n = 15 for each group). Data are shown as mean values ± SEM.
Generalised tonic-clonic seizure appearance time (GTCSAT) in treated group 1 (Tr1, n = 15), treated group 2 (Tr2, n = 10), and treated group 3 (Tr3, n = 7). ∗ P < 0.05 versus Tr1.
| Group | Tr1 | Tr2 | Tr3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time (min) | 16.06 ± 0.60 | 13.33 ± 0.51∗ | 12.46 ± 0.39∗ |
Average latency to reach the hidden platform from the north and west starting points for control (C1, n = 18), (C2, n = 10), and (C3, n = 7) and treated (Tr1, n = 18), (Tr2, n = 10), and (Tr3, n = 11) rats by the 4th learning day in the Morris water maze. Data are shown as mean values ± SEM. Values not sharing the same letter are significantly different; P < 0.01.
| Group | North | West | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time (sec) | C1 | 19.57 ± 3.22a | 17.85 ± 3.38a |
| Tr1 | 38.75 ± 5.04b | 30.23 ± 3.88b | |
| C2 | 20.50 ± 5.33a | 14.50 ± 1.38a | |
| Tr2 | 44.12 ± 5.75b | 36.80 ± 7.35b | |
| C3 | 7.50 ± 1.70c | 4.30 ± 0.65c | |
| Tr3 | 5.54 ± 1.03c | 7.72 ± 2.37c |
Average time spent by control (C1, C2, and C3) and treated (Tr1, Tr2, and Tr3) groups in target quadrant. Data are shown as mean values ± SEM. Values not sharing the same letter are significantly different; P < 0.01.
| Group | C1 | Tr1 | C2 | Tr2 | C3 | Tr3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time (sec) | 22.31 ± 1.90a | 17.13 ± 2.20b | 28.18 ± 4.93a | 19.07 ± 3.10b | 51.44 ± 5.94c | 47.53 ± 5.60c |
Average latency to reach the visible platform (southwest quadrant) for control (C1, C2, and C3) and treated (Tr1, Tr2, and Tr3) groups after north or west introduction. Data are shown as mean values ± SEM. ∗ P < 0.05 versus corresponding control.
| Group | North | West | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time (sec) | C1 | 24.16 ± 7.08 | 13.21 ± 6.92 |
| Tr1 | 25.61 ± 7.49 | 18.13 ± 7.90 | |
| C2 | 25.60 ± 3.98 | 12.60 ± 3.84 | |
| Tr2 | 29.01 ± 5.99 | 18.30 ± 5.49 | |
| C3 | 23.45 ± 2.44 | 13.18 ± 2.95 | |
| Tr3 | 34.09 ± 3.04∗ | 25.81 ± 6.55∗ |