Literature DB >> 26063929

Predictive value of transcranial evoked potentials during mechanical endovascular therapy for acute ischaemic stroke: a feasibility study.

Ehab Shiban1, Silke Wunderlich2, Kornelia Kreiser3, Jens Lehmberg1, Bernhard Hemmer2, Sascha Prothmann3, Claus Zimmer3, Bernhard Meyer1, Florian Ringel1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Mechanical endovascular therapy (MET) is a promising adjuvant or stand-alone therapy for acute ischaemic stroke caused by occlusion of a large vessel. Real-time monitoring of recanalisation success with regard to functional outcome is usually not possible because these procedures are mainly performed under general anaesthesia. We present a novel application for evoked potential monitoring for real-time evaluation of reperfusion success with respect to functional outcome during MET for acute ischaemic stroke.
METHODS: Prospective observational study from March 2012 to April 2013 of patients presenting with acute ischaemic stroke who were eligible for MET. Transcranial motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) were measured bilaterally during MET throughout the intervention. The electrophysiological data of the contralateral side served as control. Neurological outcome was assessed by the modified Rankin Scale and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale at 0, 7 and 90 days following intervention.
RESULTS: 20 patients were examined. MEPs and SSEPs were technically successful in 19 (95%) and 9 (45%) cases, respectively. Successful reperfusion was achieved in 16 cases. Functional recovery was observed in 14 patients. MEPs and SSEPs recovery status was a better predictor of functional recovery than successful reperfusion with a positive predictive value of 92%, 83% and 75% for MEPs, SSEPs and reperfusion, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: MEPs and SSEPs are safe and feasible methods of real-time monitoring of reperfusion success with respect to functional outcome during MET for acute ischaemic stroke. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26063929     DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2015-310649

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  5 in total

Review 1.  Noninvasive Neuromonitoring: Current Utility in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Traumatic Brain Injury, and Stroke.

Authors:  Luisa Vinciguerra; Julian Bösel
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.210

2.  The Prognostic Utility of Electroencephalography in Stroke Recovery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Amanda A Vatinno; Annie Simpson; Viswanathan Ramakrishnan; Heather S Bonilha; Leonardo Bonilha; Na Jin Seo
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2022-03-20       Impact factor: 3.919

3.  Intraoperative motor-evoked potential monitoring during coil embolization for anterior choroidal artery aneurysms.

Authors:  Akira Ito; Kenichi Sato; Kuniyasu Niizuma; Hidenori Endo; Yasushi Matsumoto; Teiji Tominaga
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Management of the Interventional Stroke Patient.

Authors:  Julian Bösel
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 5.  Ten problems and solutions when predicting individual outcome from lesion site after stroke.

Authors:  Cathy J Price; Thomas M Hope; Mohamed L Seghier
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 6.556

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.