Literature DB >> 26063908

Disrupting the supplementary motor area makes physical effort appear less effortful.

Alexandre Zénon1, Mariam Sidibé2, Etienne Olivier2.   

Abstract

The perception of physical effort is relatively unaffected by the suppression of sensory afferences, indicating that this function relies mostly on the processing of the central motor command. Neural signals in the supplementary motor area (SMA) correlate with the intensity of effort, suggesting that the motor signal involved in effort perception could originate from this area, but experimental evidence supporting this view is still lacking. Here, we tested this hypothesis by disrupting neural activity in SMA, in primary motor cortex (M1), or in a control site by means of continuous theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation, while measuring effort perception during grip forces of different intensities. After each grip force exertion, participants had the opportunity to either accept or refuse to replicate the same effort for varying amounts of reward. In addition to the subjective rating of perceived exertion, effort perception was estimated on the basis of the acceptance rate, the effort replication accuracy, the influence of the effort exerted in trial t on trial t+1, and pupil dilation. We found that disruption of SMA activity, but not of M1, led to a consistent decrease in effort perception, whatever the measure used to assess it. Accordingly, we modeled effort perception in a structural equation model and found that only SMA disruption led to a significant alteration of effort perception. These findings indicate that effort perception relies on the processing of a signal originating from motor-related neural circuits upstream of M1 and that SMA is a key node of this network.
Copyright © 2015 the authors 0270-6474/15/358737-08$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TMS; cTBS; effort perception; primary motor cortex; supplementary motor area

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26063908      PMCID: PMC6605204          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3789-14.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  37 in total

Review 1.  Can Doping be a Good Thing? Using Psychoactive Drugs to Facilitate Physical Activity Behaviour.

Authors:  Samuele Marcora
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  The Effects of Mental Fatigue on Physical Performance: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jeroen Van Cutsem; Samuele Marcora; Kevin De Pauw; Stephen Bailey; Romain Meeusen; Bart Roelands
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  The functional role of beta-oscillations in the supplementary motor area during reaching and grasping after stroke: A question of structural damage to the corticospinal tract.

Authors:  Fanny Quandt; Marlene Bönstrup; Robert Schulz; Jan E Timmermann; Maike Mund; Maximilian J Wessel; Friedhelm C Hummel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 4.  Translating Fatigue to Human Performance.

Authors:  Roger M Enoka; Jacques Duchateau
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  The effect of pedalling cadence on respiratory frequency: passive vs. active exercise of different intensities.

Authors:  Michele Girardi; Andrea Nicolò; Ilenia Bazzucchi; Francesco Felici; Massimo Sacchetti
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  The sensory origin of the sense of effort is context-dependent.

Authors:  Florian Monjo; Jonathan Shemmell; Nicolas Forestier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The supplementary motor area modulates interhemispheric interactions during movement preparation.

Authors:  Quentin Welniarz; Cécile Gallea; Jean-Charles Lamy; Aurélie Méneret; Traian Popa; Romain Valabregue; Benoît Béranger; Vanessa Brochard; Constance Flamand-Roze; Oriane Trouillard; Cécilia Bonnet; Norbert Brüggemann; Pierre Bitoun; Bertrand Degos; Cécile Hubsch; Elodie Hainque; Jean-Louis Golmard; Marie Vidailhet; Stéphane Lehéricy; Isabelle Dusart; Sabine Meunier; Emmanuel Roze
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 8.  The tenacious brain: How the anterior mid-cingulate contributes to achieving goals.

Authors:  Alexandra Touroutoglou; Joseph Andreano; Bradford C Dickerson; Lisa Feldman Barrett
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 4.027

9.  Dopamine Manipulation Affects Response Vigor Independently of Opportunity Cost.

Authors:  Alexandre Zénon; Sophie Devesse; Etienne Olivier
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Bilateral extracephalic transcranial direct current stimulation improves endurance performance in healthy individuals.

Authors:  L Angius; A R Mauger; J Hopker; A Pascual-Leone; E Santarnecchi; S M Marcora
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 8.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.