Paolo Pedrazzoli1, Massimo Martino2, Sara Delfanti2, Daniele Generali2, Giovanni Rosti2, Marco Bregni2, Francesco Lanza2. 1. SC Oncologia, Dipartimento Onco-ematologico, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia, Italy (PP, SD); Ematologia con Trapianto di Midollo Osseo e Terapia Intensiva, Azienda Ospedaliera Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli, Reggio Calabria, Italy (MM); US Terapia Molecolare e Farmacogenomica/UO Patologia Mammaria, Azienda Istituti Ospitalieri di Cremona, Cremona, Italy (DG); SC Oncologia Medica, Ospedale S. Maria di Ca' Foncello, Treviso, Italy (GR); SC Oncologia Medica, Dipartimento di Oncologia, Ospedale di Circolo, Busto Arsizio (Va), Italy (MB); Sezione di Ematologia e CTMO, Azienda Istituti Ospitalieri di Cremona, Cremona, Italy (FL). p.pedrazzoli@smatteo.pv.it. 2. SC Oncologia, Dipartimento Onco-ematologico, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia, Italy (PP, SD); Ematologia con Trapianto di Midollo Osseo e Terapia Intensiva, Azienda Ospedaliera Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli, Reggio Calabria, Italy (MM); US Terapia Molecolare e Farmacogenomica/UO Patologia Mammaria, Azienda Istituti Ospitalieri di Cremona, Cremona, Italy (DG); SC Oncologia Medica, Ospedale S. Maria di Ca' Foncello, Treviso, Italy (GR); SC Oncologia Medica, Dipartimento di Oncologia, Ospedale di Circolo, Busto Arsizio (Va), Italy (MB); Sezione di Ematologia e CTMO, Azienda Istituti Ospitalieri di Cremona, Cremona, Italy (FL).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for breast cancer (BC) has been an area of intense controversy among the medical oncology community. Over the last decade, due to the presentation of negative results from early randomized studies, this approach has not longer been considered an option by the vast majority of medical oncologists. This article is aimed to clarify what happened and where we are now in this not exhausted field. METHODS: We critically revised the published literature regarding HDC in the setting of high-risk BC, including a recent meta-analysis using individual patient data from 15 randomized studies. RESULTS: A significant benefit by HDC in recurrence-free survival has been clearly documented in unselected patient populations. In HER2-negative population, particularly in the triple-negative disease, a positive effect of intensified therapy in overall survival is biologically plausible and supported by clinical evidence. Over the years HDC with support of adequate number of stem cells has become a safe treatment modality. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of higher doses of chemotherapy with stem cell support may still represent a therapeutic option (and not a recommendation) in selected BC patients. This approach should be investigated further.
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for breast cancer (BC) has been an area of intense controversy among the medical oncology community. Over the last decade, due to the presentation of negative results from early randomized studies, this approach has not longer been considered an option by the vast majority of medical oncologists. This article is aimed to clarify what happened and where we are now in this not exhausted field. METHODS: We critically revised the published literature regarding HDC in the setting of high-risk BC, including a recent meta-analysis using individual patient data from 15 randomized studies. RESULTS: A significant benefit by HDC in recurrence-free survival has been clearly documented in unselected patient populations. In HER2-negative population, particularly in the triple-negative disease, a positive effect of intensified therapy in overall survival is biologically plausible and supported by clinical evidence. Over the years HDC with support of adequate number of stem cells has become a safe treatment modality. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of higher doses of chemotherapy with stem cell support may still represent a therapeutic option (and not a recommendation) in selected BC patients. This approach should be investigated further.
Authors: J R Passweg; H Baldomero; P Bader; C Bonini; S Cesaro; P Dreger; R F Duarte; C Dufour; J Kuball; D Farge-Bancel; A Gennery; N Kröger; F Lanza; A Nagler; A Sureda; M Mohty Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2016-11-07 Impact factor: 5.483