Literature DB >> 26063834

Patient Satisfaction After Rhinoplasty: A Social Media Analysis.

Ibrahim Khansa1, Lara Khansa1, Gregory D Pearson1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Compared to other cosmetic procedures, rhinoplasty has a relatively low patient satisfaction rate, due to the difficulty of the procedure, and potentially unrealistic patient expectations. Understanding the reasons behind patient dissatisfaction is key to improving outcomes. Previous authors have done surgeon-initiated surveys, expert ratings, and morphologic measurements, to measure rhinoplasty success. No study has analyzed online reviews by patients to identify reasons for dissatisfaction with rhinoplasty.
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to analyze satisfaction patterns in rhinoplasty using online reviews.
METHODS: All primary rhinoplasty reviews on RealSelf (Seattle, WA), a social media website for patients undergoing cosmetic surgery, were reviewed. The researchers recorded patient gender, whether they were satisfied, and the reasons for satisfaction or dissatisfaction. Male and female patients were compared, using chi-squared analysis.
RESULTS: There were 2326 reviews for primary rhinoplasty (2032 females, 294 males). The overall satisfaction rate was 83.6%. Significantly more females than males were satisfied (87.6% vs 56.1%, P < .001). Among males, the most common reasons for dissatisfaction were residual dorsal hump, under-rotated tip, and a nose that was too small. Among females, the most common reasons for dissatisfaction were residual dorsal hump, under-rotated tip, and bulbous tip. Among dissatisfied patients, females were significantly more likely than males to precisely verbalize the morphologic or functional reason for their dissatisfaction.
CONCLUSIONS: We found that males had lower satisfaction with rhinoplasty, and were more vague when expressing reasons for dissatisfaction, than females. Social media provides a novel way to understand reasons for patient dissatisfaction after cosmetic surgery.
© 2015 The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Inc. Reprints and permission: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26063834     DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjv095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthet Surg J        ISSN: 1090-820X            Impact factor:   4.283


  17 in total

Review 1.  Emerging trends in social media and plastic surgery.

Authors:  Daniel J Gould; Hyuma A Leland; Adelyn L Ho; Ketan M Patel
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-12

2.  Forehead Contouring as an Adjunct to Rhinoplasty: Evaluation of the Effect on Facial Appearance, Personal Traits and Patient Satisfaction.

Authors:  Oguzhan Demirel
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 2.326

3.  Gender specific considerations in septorhinoplasty, a retrospective observational study and review of the literature.

Authors:  S L Gillanders; M Walsh; S Anderson; S Abdulrahman
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-05-18

4.  Functional and Radiological Assessment After Preservation Rhinoplasty - A Clinical Study.

Authors:  Georges Stergiou; Mathias Tremp; Valerio Finocchi; Yves Saban
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.155

5.  Evaluation of Migraine Surgery Outcomes through Social Media.

Authors:  Katie G Egan; Jacqueline S Israel; Rezvaneh Ghasemzadeh; Ahmed M Afifi
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2016-10-24

6.  Readability of Online Materials for Rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Pauline Joy F Santos; David A Daar; Keyianoosh Z Paydar; Garrett A Wirth
Journal:  World J Plast Surg       Date:  2018-01

7.  Three-dimensional Morphing and Its Added Value in the Rhinoplasty Consult.

Authors:  Garyfalia Lekakis; Greet Hens; Peter Claes; Peter W Hellings
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-01-04

8.  Satisfaction in Patients After Rhinoplasty Using the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation Questionnaire.

Authors:  Nasir Khan; Mamoon Rashid; Ibrahim Khan; Saad Ur Rehman Sarwar; Haroon Ur Rashid; Mariam Khurshid; Usama Khalid Choudry; Noor Fatima
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-07-30

9.  Revision rhinoplasty: measurement of patient-reported outcomes and analysis of predictive factors.

Authors:  Ozan Luay Abbas
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-09-01

10.  Functional and Aesthetic Factors Associated with Revision of Rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Jebrane Bouaoud; Marine Loustau; Jean-Baptiste Belloc
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-09-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.