Literature DB >> 26063830

Three-Dimensional Analysis of Long-Term Midface Volume Change After Vertical Vector Deep-Plane Rhytidectomy.

Andrew A Jacono1, Melanie H Malone1, Benjamin Talei1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Facial aging is a complicated process that includes volume loss and soft tissue descent. This study provides quantitative 3-dimensional (3D) data on the long-term effect of vertical vector deep-plane rhytidectomy on restoring volume to the midface.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if primary vertical vector deep-plane rhytidectomy resulted in long-term volume change in the midface.
METHODS: We performed a prospective study on patients undergoing primary vertical vector deep-plane rhytidectomy to quantitate 3D volume changes in the midface. Quantitative analysis of volume changes was made using the Vectra 3D imaging software (Canfield Scientific, Inc, Fairfield, New Jersey) at a minimum follow-up of 1 year.
RESULTS: Forty-three patients (86 hemifaces) were analyzed. The average volume gained in each hemi-midface after vertical vector deep-plane rhytidectomy was 3.2 mL.
CONCLUSIONS: Vertical vector deep-plane rhytidectomy provides significant long-term augmentation of volume in the midface. These quantitative data demonstrate that some midface volume loss is related to gravitational descent of the cheek fat compartments and that vertical vector deep-plane rhytidectomy may obviate the need for other volumization procedures such as autologous fat grafting in selected cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Therapeutic.
© 2015 The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Inc. Reprints and permission: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26063830     DOI: 10.1093/asj/sju171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthet Surg J        ISSN: 1090-820X            Impact factor:   4.283


  6 in total

Review 1.  A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Early Relapse After Facelift.

Authors:  Arda Kucukguven; Aysuna Galandarova; Ozan Bitik
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 2.326

2.  Establishing Photographic Standards for Facial Transplantation: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Erin M Wolfe; Guillermo Najera-Sweeney; Zoe P Berman; Allyson R Alfonso; Gustave K Diep; Elie P Ramly; Eduardo D Rodriguez
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-05-14

3.  Long-term Patterns of Age-Related Facial Bone Loss in Black Individuals.

Authors:  David Buziashvili; Jacob I Tower; Neel R Sangal; Aakash M Shah; Boris Paskhover
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.611

4.  Clinical Photography for Periorbital and Facial Aesthetic Practice.

Authors:  Akshay Gopinathan Nair; Aparna Santhanam
Journal:  J Cutan Aesthet Surg       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

Review 5.  Preventing the Complications Associated with the Use of Dermal Fillers in Facial Aesthetic Procedures: An Expert Group Consensus Report.

Authors:  Fernando Urdiales-Gálvez; Nuria Escoda Delgado; Vitor Figueiredo; José V Lajo-Plaza; Mar Mira; Francisco Ortíz-Martí; Rosa Del Rio-Reyes; Nazaret Romero-Álvarez; Sofía Ruiz Del Cueto; María A Segurado; Cristina Villanueva Rebenaque
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 2.326

6.  Photographic Comparison of Malar Projection in 100 Facelift Patients Treated with and without Fat Injection.

Authors:  Eric Swanson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-10-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.