Okeoma Mmeje1, Joan M Chow2, Lisette Davidson3, Jennifer Shieh4, Jeffrey M Schapiro4, Ina U Park5. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 2. Sexually Transmitted Disease Control Branch, Division of Communicable Disease Control, California Department of Public Health, Center for Infectious Diseases, Richmond. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oakland Medical Center. 4. The Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland. 5. Sexually Transmitted Disease Control Branch, Division of Communicable Disease Control, California Department of Public Health, Center for Infectious Diseases, Richmond Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The reverse sequence algorithm is often used for prenatal syphilis screening by high-volume laboratories, beginning with a treponemal test such as the chemiluminescence immunoassay (CIA), followed by testing of CIA-positive (CIA(+)) specimens with the rapid plasma reagin test (RPR). The clinical significance of discordant serology (CIA(+)/RPR(-)) for maternal and neonatal outcomes is unknown. METHODS: From August 2007 to August 2010, all pregnant women at Kaiser Permanente Northern California with discordant treponemal serology underwent reflexive testing with Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay (TP-PA) and were categorized as "TP-PA confirmed" (CIA(+)/RPR(-)/TP-PA(+)) or "isolated CIA positive" (CIA(+)/RPR(-)/TP-PA(-)). Demographic variables and clinical data were abstracted from the medical record and compared by TP-PA status. RESULTS: Of 194 pregnant women, 156 (80%) were CIA(+)/RPR(-)/TP-PA(-) and 38 (20%) were CIA(+)/RPR(-)/TP-PA(+). Among the 77 (49%) CIA(+)/RPR(-)/TP-PA(-) women who were retested, 53% became CIA(-). CIA(+)/RPR(-)/TP-PA(+) (n = 38) women were more likely to be older, have a prior history of sexually transmitted infections, and receive treatment for syphilis during pregnancy than women who were CIA(+)/RPR(-)/TP-PA(-) (all P < .005). Most pregnancies (189/194 [97.5%]) resulted in a live birth; there was no difference in birth outcomes according to TP-PA status and no stillbirths attributable to syphilis. CONCLUSIONS: Most pregnant women with discordant serology were CIA(+)/RPR(-)/TP-PA(-); more than half who were retested became CIA(-). CIA(+)/RPR(-)/TP-PA(-) serology in pregnancy is likely to be falsely positive. Reflexive testing of discordant specimens with TP-PA is important to stratify risk given the likelihood of false-positive results in this population.
BACKGROUND: The reverse sequence algorithm is often used for prenatal syphilis screening by high-volume laboratories, beginning with a treponemal test such as the chemiluminescence immunoassay (CIA), followed by testing of CIA-positive (CIA(+)) specimens with the rapid plasma reagin test (RPR). The clinical significance of discordant serology (CIA(+)/RPR(-)) for maternal and neonatal outcomes is unknown. METHODS: From August 2007 to August 2010, all pregnant women at Kaiser Permanente Northern California with discordant treponemal serology underwent reflexive testing with Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay (TP-PA) and were categorized as "TP-PA confirmed" (CIA(+)/RPR(-)/TP-PA(+)) or "isolated CIA positive" (CIA(+)/RPR(-)/TP-PA(-)). Demographic variables and clinical data were abstracted from the medical record and compared by TP-PA status. RESULTS: Of 194 pregnant women, 156 (80%) were CIA(+)/RPR(-)/TP-PA(-) and 38 (20%) were CIA(+)/RPR(-)/TP-PA(+). Among the 77 (49%) CIA(+)/RPR(-)/TP-PA(-) women who were retested, 53% became CIA(-). CIA(+)/RPR(-)/TP-PA(+) (n = 38) women were more likely to be older, have a prior history of sexually transmitted infections, and receive treatment for syphilis during pregnancy than women who were CIA(+)/RPR(-)/TP-PA(-) (all P < .005). Most pregnancies (189/194 [97.5%]) resulted in a live birth; there was no difference in birth outcomes according to TP-PA status and no stillbirths attributable to syphilis. CONCLUSIONS: Most pregnant women with discordant serology were CIA(+)/RPR(-)/TP-PA(-); more than half who were retested became CIA(-). CIA(+)/RPR(-)/TP-PA(-) serology in pregnancy is likely to be falsely positive. Reflexive testing of discordant specimens with TP-PA is important to stratify risk given the likelihood of false-positive results in this population.
Authors: Ina U Park; Joan M Chow; Gail Bolan; Mark Stanley; Jennifer Shieh; Jeffrey M Schapiro Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2011-09-19 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: F Tinajeros; D Grossman; K Richmond; M Steele; S G Garcia; L Zegarra; R Revollo Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2006-11-22 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Ina U Park; Yetunde F Fakile; Joan M Chow; Kathleen J Gustafson; Heather Jost; Jeffrey M Schapiro; Susan Novak-Weekley; Anthony Tran; Jim H Nomura; Victor Chen; Manie Beheshti; Townson Tsai; Karen Hoover; Gail Bolan Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Meredith E Clement; Amr Hammouda; Lawrence P Park; Jason Maxwell; Erika Samoff; Arlene C Seña; Maria Joyce Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2017-11-13 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Jodie Dionne-Odom; Barbara Van Der Pol; Alex Boutwell; Niranjan Biligowda; Daphne G Schmid; Edward W Hook Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2021-09-01 Impact factor: 3.868