| Literature DB >> 26063440 |
Jesse Chandler1, Gabriele Paolacci2, Eyal Peer3, Pam Mueller4, Kate A Ratliff5.
Abstract
Although researchers often assume their participants are naive to experimental materials, this is not always the case. We investigated how prior exposure to a task affects subsequent experimental results. Participants in this study completed the same set of 12 experimental tasks at two points in time, first as a part of the Many Labs replication project and again a few days, a week, or a month later. Effect sizes were markedly lower in the second wave than in the first. The reduction was most pronounced when participants were assigned to a different condition in the second wave. We discuss the methodological implications of these findings.Entities:
Keywords: effect sizes; judgment and decision making; nonnaïveté; open data; open materials; panel conditioning; repeated participation; research methods
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26063440 DOI: 10.1177/0956797615585115
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Psychol Sci ISSN: 0956-7976