Literature DB >> 26063095

A field study of household attack rates and the effectiveness of macrolide antibiotics in reducing household transmission of pertussis.

Janet B Terry1, Christopher J Flatley2, Debra J van den Berg3, Geoffrey G Morgan4, Marianne Trent5, John A Turahui6, Michelle C Greenwood7, Paul W Corben8, Greg J Bell9.   

Abstract

Bordetella pertussis (whooping cough) is an endemic, highly contagious bacterial respiratory infection, which is notifiable to Australian state and territory health departments. Between 2008 and 2011 there was a substantial outbreak in New South Wales with an initial increase in cases occurring in North Coast New South Wales from late 2007. During September and October 2011 the North Coast Public Health Unit conducted a household study of secondary attack rates to assess the effectiveness of pertussis vaccination as well as the timely use of antibiotics in preventing household transmission. At the time the study was commenced, notified cases included a large proportion of individuals with a documented history of vaccination against pertussis. We found lower attack rates amongst vaccinated compared with non-vaccinated subjects in all age groups, with the exception of the 5-11 years age group, who were also primarily responsible for the introduction of pertussis into the household. There was an increased risk of pertussis transmission from the household first primary case to contacts when antibiotic treatment was commenced later than 7 days after the onset of symptoms compared with within 7 days. This protective effect of timely antibiotic treatment in relation to transmission highlights the need to control for antibiotic treatment in field studies of pertussis. The benefits of timely diagnosis and use of antibiotics in preventing household transmission underscore the importance of early presentation and diagnosis of pertussis cases, particularly in households with susceptible occupants. This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce the whole or part of this work in unaltered form for your own personal use or, if you are part of an organisation, for internal use within your organisation, but only if you or your organisation do not use the reproduction for any commercial purpose and retain this copyright notice and all disclaimer notices as part of that reproduction. Apart from rights to use as permitted by the Copyright Act 1968 or allowed by this copyright notice, all other rights are reserved and you are not allowed to reproduce the whole or any part of this work in any way (electronic or otherwise) without first being given the specific written permission from the Commonwealth to do so. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights are to be sent to the Online, Services and External Relations Branch, Department of Health, GPO Box 9848, Canberra ACT 2601, or by email to copyright@health.gov.au.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26063095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Commun Dis Intell Q Rep        ISSN: 1447-4514


  5 in total

Review 1.  Bordetella pertussis transmission.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Trainor; Tracy L Nicholson; Tod J Merkel
Journal:  Pathog Dis       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 3.166

Review 2.  Bordetella pertussis: new concepts in pathogenesis and treatment.

Authors:  Nicholas H Carbonetti
Journal:  Curr Opin Infect Dis       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.915

3.  Clinical evaluation of a new rapid immunochromatographic test for detection of Bordetella pertussis antigen.

Authors:  Kenji Okada; Yuho Horikoshi; Naoko Nishimura; Shigeki Ishii; Hiroko Nogami; Chikako Motomura; Isao Miyairi; Naoki Tsumura; Toshihiko Mori; Kenta Ito; Shinichi Honma; Kensuke Nagai; Hiroshi Tanaka; Toru Hayakawa; Chiharu Abe; Kazunobu Ouchi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Is the current pertussis incidence only the results of testing? A spatial and space-time analysis of pertussis surveillance data using cluster detection methods and geographically weighted regression modelling.

Authors:  Boris Kauhl; Jeanne Heil; Christian J P A Hoebe; Jürgen Schweikart; Thomas Krafft; Nicole H T M Dukers-Muijrers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Estimating and interpreting secondary attack risk: Binomial considered biased.

Authors:  Yushuf Sharker; Eben Kenah
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 4.475

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.