Literature DB >> 26062927

Management of Discharged Emergency Department Patients with a Primary Diagnosis of Hypertension: A Multicentre Study.

Dennis D Cho1, Peter C Austin2, Clare L Atzema1.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Introduction Many patients are seen in the emergency department (ED) for hypertension, and the numbers will likely increase in the future. Given limited evidence to guide the management of such patients, the practice of one's peers provides a de facto standard.
METHODS: A survey was distributed to emergency physicians during academic rounds at three community and four tertiary EDs. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of participants who had a blood pressure (BP) threshold at which they would offer a new antihypertensive prescription to patients they were sending home from the ED. Secondary outcomes included patient- and provider-level factors associated with initiating an antihypertensive based on clinical vignettes of a 69-year-old man with two levels of hypertension (160/100 vs 200/110 mm Hg), as well as the recommended number of days after which to follow up with a primary care provider following ED discharge.
RESULTS: All 81 surveys were completed (100%). Half (51.9%; 95% CI 40.5-63.1) of participants indicated that they had a systolic BP threshold for initiating an antihypertensive, and 55.6% (95% CI 44.1-66.6) had a diastolic threshold: mean systolic threshold was 199 mm Hg (SD 19) while diastolic was 111 mm Hg (SD 8). A higher BP (OR 12.9; 95% CI 7.5-22.2) and more patient comorbidities (OR 3.0; 95% CI 2.1-4.3) were associated with offering an antihypertensive prescription, while physician years of practice, certification type, and hospital type were not. Participants recommended follow-up care within a median 7.0 and 3.0 days for the patient with lower and higher BP levels, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Half of surveyed emergency physicians report having a BP threshold to start an antihypertensive; BP levels and number of patient comorbidities were associated with a modification of the decision, while physician characteristics were not. Most physicians recommended follow-up care within seven days of ED discharge.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Continuity of Care; Emergency Department; Evidence-Based Medicine; Follow-up Care; Hypertension

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26062927     DOI: 10.1017/cem.2015.36

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CJEM        ISSN: 1481-8035            Impact factor:   2.410


  4 in total

1.  Incident atrial fibrillation in the emergency department in Ontario: a population-based retrospective cohort study of follow-up care.

Authors:  Clare L Atzema; Bing Yu; Noah Ivers; Paula Rochon; Douglas S Lee; Michael J Schull; Peter C Austin
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2015-04-02

Review 2.  Public Health, Hypertension, and the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Aaron Brody; Alex Janke; Vineet Sharma; Phillip Levy
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.369

3.  Effect of early physician follow-up on mortality and subsequent hospital admissions after emergency care for heart failure: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Clare L Atzema; Peter C Austin; Bing Yu; Michael J Schull; Cynthia A Jackevicius; Noah M Ivers; Paula A Rochon; Douglas S Lee
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Hot Topic: Global Burden of Treating Hypertension-What is the Role of the Emergency Department?

Authors:  Aaron M Brody; Vijaya A Kumar; Phillip D Levy
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 5.369

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.