| Literature DB >> 26062838 |
Ebru Kirac1, Filiz Özcan1, Hazal Tuzcu1, Gulsum O Elpek2, Mutay Aslan1.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to assess omega-3 (n-3) and omega-6 (n-6) polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) in liver tissue and evaluate changes in the n‑6-associated inflammatory pathway following liver ischemia/re‑perfusion (IR) injury. Male Wistar rats which were allowed free access to standard rat chow were included in the study. Blood vessels supplying the median and left lateral hepatic lobes were occluded with an arterial clamp for 60 min, followed by 60 min of re‑perfusion. Levels of arachidonic acid (AA, C20:4n‑6), dihomo‑gamma‑linolenic acid (DGLA, C20:3n‑6), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, C20:5n‑3) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, C22:6n‑3) in liver tissue were determined by an optimized multiple reaction monitoring method using ultra fast‑liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. Phospholipase A2 (PLA2), cyclooxygenase (COX) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) were measured in tissue samples to evaluate changes in the n‑6 inflammatory pathway. Total histopathological score of cellular damage were significantly increased following hepatic IR injury. n‑3 and n‑6 PUFA levels were significantly increased in post‑ischemic liver tissue compared to those in non‑ischemic controls. No significant difference was observed in the AA/DHA and AA/EPA ratio in post‑ischemic liver tissues compared with that in the control. Tissue activity of PLA2 and COX as well as PGE2 levels were significantly increased in post‑ischemic liver tissues compared to those in non‑ischemic controls. The results of the present study suggested that increased hydrolysis of fatty acids via PLA2 triggers the activity of COX and leads to increased PGE2 levels. Future studies evaluating agents which block the formation of eicosanoids derived from n‑6 PUFAs may facilitate the development and application of treatment strategies in liver injury following IR.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26062838 PMCID: PMC4526095 DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2015.3908
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Med Rep ISSN: 1791-2997 Impact factor: 2.952
Figure 1Hematoxylin and eosin staining of liver sections. Representative hepatic photomicrographs from each of the three groups (magnification, ×200). IR, ischemia/re-perfusion; CV, central vein.
Histopathological scores of liver sections.
| Group | Congestion | Intracellular edema | Necrosis | Total score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sham (n=4) | 0.50±0.58 | 0.50±0.58 | 0.75±0.50 | 1.75±0.50 |
| Control (n=8) | 1.25±0.89 | 0.63±0.52 | 0.25±0.46 | 2.13±1.46 |
| IR (n=8) | 2.00±1.07 | 1.88±0.64 | 1.88±0.84 | 5.75±2.12 |
Values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analysis for congestion, necrosis and total score were performed by one-way analysis of variance and all pairwise multiple comparisons were performed using Tukey's test. Statistical analysis for intracellular edema was performed by Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance and all pairwise multiple comparisons by Dunn's method.
P<0.05 vs. sham;
P<0.05 vs. sham and control. IR, ischemia/re-perfusion.
Plasma activity of ALT.
| Group | n | Plasma ALT (U/l) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 10 | 27.56±4.41 |
| Sham | 5 | 24.61±2.40 |
| IR | 10 | 198.25±44.56 |
All values are expressed as the mean ± standard error of the mean. IR, ischemia/re-perfusion. Statistical analysis was performed by Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance on ranks and all pairwise multiple comparisons were via Dunn's method.
P<0.05 vs. control and sham. ALT, alanine aminotransferase.
Figure 2Representative (left) electron spray ionization mass spectra and (right) tandem mass spectra of (A) control (B) sham and (C) IR groups. Spectra were recorded in negative ion mode. IR, ischemia/re-perfusion; AA, arachidonic acid; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid.
Analysis of polyunsaturated fatty acids in liver tissue.
| Parameter | Control (n=10) | Sham (n=5) | IR (n=10) |
|---|---|---|---|
| DGLA (C20:3n6) | 2.95±1.56 | 4.98±1.94 | 7.86±2.41 |
| AA (C20:4n6) | 29.36±12.73 | 38.26±17.72 | 62.16±17.68 |
| EPA (C20:5n3) | 0.86±0.53 | 0.80±0.13 | 2.27±0.87 |
| DHA (C22:6n3) | 10.02±4.82 | 10.67±2.39 | 20.43±7.63 |
| AA/DHA | 3.01±0.76 | 3.53±1.14 | 3.26±1.06 |
| AA/EPA | 39.07±12.83 | 29.39±7.86 | 26.32±2.57 |
Values are stated in mg fatty acid/g tissue protein and are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analyses were performed by one-way analysis of variance and all pairwise multiple comparisons via Tukey's test.
P<0.05 compared to control and sham groups. IR, ischemia/re-perfusion; DGLA, dihomo-gamma-linolenic acid; AA, arachidonic acid; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid.
Figure 3(A) Activity of total PLA2 in the liver. Statistical was performed by one-way analysis of variance and all pairwise multiple comparisons were via Tukey's test. (B) Activity of total COX in the liver. Statistical analysis was performed by Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance and all pairwise multiple comparisons were by Dunn's method. (C) Levels of PGE2 in the liver. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way analysis of variance and all pairwise multiple comparisons were via Tukey's test. Values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. *P<0.001 vs. sham and control. IR, ischemia/re-perfusion; PLA2, phospholipase A2; COX, cyclooxygenase;.PGE2, prostaglandin E2.