CONCLUSIONS: EABR is a reliable and effective way of objectively confirming device function and implant-responsiveness of the peripheral auditory neurons up to the level of the brainstem in cases of inner ear malformation. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the usefulness of measuring the intra-operative electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) and electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR) in patients with and without congenital inner ear anomalies during cochlear implantation. METHOD: Thirty-eight consecutive children (40 ears) aged 5 or younger with congenital profound hearing loss. Twenty-four (25 ears) lacked congenital inner ear anomalies. The 14 patients (15 ears) with a malformation had common cavities (four ears), incomplete partition type I (three ears), cochlea hypoplasia type III (three ears), enlarged vestibular aqueduct (four ears), and cochlear nerve canal stenosis (one ear). Main outcome measures are ECAP and EABR responses. RESULTS: Of the 25 ears lacking any malformation, 21, three, and one showed 'Good', 'Variable', and 'No' ECAP responses, respectively, and 24 and one showed 'Good' and 'Variable' intra-cochlear responses, respectively. Of the 15 ears with a malformation, two showed 'Good' ECAP responses, nine had 'Variable' ECAP responses, and four showed 'No' ECAP responses. Moreover, five showed 'Good' EABR responses and 10 showed 'Variable' EABR responses.
CONCLUSIONS: EABR is a reliable and effective way of objectively confirming device function and implant-responsiveness of the peripheral auditory neurons up to the level of the brainstem in cases of inner ear malformation. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the usefulness of measuring the intra-operative electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) and electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR) in patients with and without congenital inner ear anomalies during cochlear implantation. METHOD: Thirty-eight consecutive children (40 ears) aged 5 or younger with congenital profound hearing loss. Twenty-four (25 ears) lacked congenital inner ear anomalies. The 14 patients (15 ears) with a malformation had common cavities (four ears), incomplete partition type I (three ears), cochlea hypoplasia type III (three ears), enlarged vestibular aqueduct (four ears), and cochlear nerve canal stenosis (one ear). Main outcome measures are ECAP and EABR responses. RESULTS: Of the 25 ears lacking any malformation, 21, three, and one showed 'Good', 'Variable', and 'No' ECAP responses, respectively, and 24 and one showed 'Good' and 'Variable' intra-cochlear responses, respectively. Of the 15 ears with a malformation, two showed 'Good' ECAP responses, nine had 'Variable' ECAP responses, and four showed 'No' ECAP responses. Moreover, five showed 'Good' EABR responses and 10 showed 'Variable' EABR responses.