Literature DB >> 26061887

Structural Approach to Bias in Meta-analyses.

Ian Shrier1.   

Abstract

Methods to calculate bias-adjusted estimates for meta-analyses are becoming more popular. The objective of this paper is to use the structural approach to bias and causal diagrams to show that (i) the current use of the bias-adjusted estimating tools may sometimes introduce bias rather than reduce it and (ii) the Cochrane collaboration risk of bias tool, which was designed for randomized studies, is also applicable to non-randomized studies with only minimal changes. Causal diagrams are used to illustrate each of the items in the current risk of bias tool and how they apply to both randomized and non-randomized studies. With the exception of confounding by indication, the structure of all potential biases present in non-randomized studies may also be present in randomized studies. In addition, causal diagrams demonstrate important limitations to the methods currently being developed to provide bias-adjusted estimates of individual studies in meta-analyses. Finally, causal diagrams can be helpful in deciding when it is appropriate to combine studies in a meta-analysis of non-randomized studies even though the studies may use different adjustment sets.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords:  bias; diagram; meta‐analyses

Year:  2012        PMID: 26061887     DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.52

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Synth Methods        ISSN: 1759-2879            Impact factor:   5.273


  3 in total

1.  Biases in Randomized Trials: A Conversation Between Trialists and Epidemiologists.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Mansournia; Julian P T Higgins; Jonathan A C Sterne; Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  The confounder matrix: A tool to assess confounding bias in systematic reviews of observational studies of etiology.

Authors:  Julie M Petersen; Malcolm Barrett; Katherine A Ahrens; Eleanor J Murray; Allison S Bryant; Carol J Hogue; Sunni L Mumford; Salini Gadupudi; Matthew P Fox; Ludovic Trinquart
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  The Use of Bayesian Networks to Assess the Quality of Evidence from Research Synthesis: 2. Inter-Rater Reliability and Comparison with Standard GRADE Assessment.

Authors:  Alexis Llewellyn; Craig Whittington; Gavin Stewart; Julian Pt Higgins; Nick Meader
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.