Literature DB >> 26061620

Industry-Cost-Curve Approach for Modeling the Environmental Impact of Introducing New Technologies in Life Cycle Assessment.

Arne Kätelhön1, Niklas von der Assen1, Sangwon Suh2, Johannes Jung1, André Bardow1.   

Abstract

The environmental costs and benefits of introducing a new technology depend not only on the technology itself, but also on the responses of the market where substitution or displacement of competing technologies may occur. An internationally accepted method taking both technological and market-mediated effects into account, however, is still lacking in life cycle assessment (LCA). For the introduction of a new technology, we here present a new approach for modeling the environmental impacts within the framework of LCA. Our approach is motivated by consequential life cycle assessment (CLCA) and aims to contribute to the discussion on how to operationalize consequential thinking in LCA practice. In our approach, we focus on new technologies producing homogeneous products such as chemicals or raw materials. We employ the industry cost-curve (ICC) for modeling market-mediated effects. Thereby, we can determine substitution effects at a level of granularity sufficient to distinguish between competing technologies. In our approach, a new technology alters the ICC potentially replacing the highest-cost producer(s). The technologies that remain competitive after the new technology's introduction determine the new environmental impact profile of the product. We apply our approach in a case study on a new technology for chlor-alkali electrolysis to be introduced in Germany.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26061620     DOI: 10.1021/es5056512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  2 in total

1.  Life cycle assessment needs predictive spatial modelling for biodiversity and ecosystem services.

Authors:  Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer; Sarah Sim; Perrine Hamel; Benjamin Bryant; Ryan Noe; Carina Mueller; Giles Rigarlsford; Michal Kulak; Virginia Kowal; Richard Sharp; Julie Clavreul; Edward Price; Stephen Polasky; Mary Ruckelshaus; Gretchen Daily
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 14.919

2.  Environmental trade-offs of direct air capture technologies in climate change mitigation toward 2100.

Authors:  Yang Qiu; Patrick Lamers; Vassilis Daioglou; Noah McQueen; Harmen-Sytze de Boer; Mathijs Harmsen; Jennifer Wilcox; André Bardow; Sangwon Suh
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 17.694

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.