| Literature DB >> 26061574 |
Fábio Wildson Gurgel Costa1, Diego Felipe Silveira Esses2, Paulo Goberlânio de Barros Silva3, Francisco Samuel Rodrigues Carvalho2, Carlos Diego Lopes Sá4, Assis Filipe Medeiros Albuquerque4, Tácio Pinheiro Bezerra5, Thyciana Rodrigues Ribeiro6, Cristiane Sá Roriz Fonteles7, Eduardo Costa Studart Soares8.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of preemptive analgesia with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in third-molar surgery. A PubMed literature search was conducted for articles restricted to the English language using the following terms (DeCS/MeSH) or combinations: analgesia, third molar, and preemptive. From a total of 704 articles, 6 (n=420 subjects) were selected. All studies presented a low risk of bias (Cochrane criteria) but exhibited high heterogeneity of methods. Two studies were excluded from the meta-analysis because they did not have adequate numeric values (dichotomous data) for the calculations. Preemptive analgesia showed no significant benefit (n=298, P=.2227, odds ratio: 2.30, 0.60-8.73) in reducing postoperative pain after removal of lower impacted third molars. However, there was a probable direct relationship between the effectiveness of NSAIDs in preemptive analgesia for removal of third molars and its selectivity for the cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2). Preemptive analgesia did not have a significant effect in reducing postoperative pain after removal of lower impacted third molars. More homogeneous and well-delineated clinical studies are necessary to determine a possible association between NSAIDs' selectivity for COX-2 and treatment effectiveness.Entities:
Keywords: Analgesia; Meta-analysis; Preemptive; Third molar
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26061574 PMCID: PMC4462701 DOI: 10.2344/0003-3006-62.2.57
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anesth Prog ISSN: 0003-3006