| Literature DB >> 26061121 |
Faten Alchab1, Laurent Ettouati2, Zouhair Bouaziz3, Andre Bollacke4, Jean-Guy Delcros5, Christoph G W Gertzen6, Holger Gohlke7, Noël Pinaud8, Mathieu Marchivie9, Jean Guillon10, Bernard Fenet11,12, Joachim Jose13, Marc Le Borgne14.
Abstract
Due to their system of annulated 6-5-5-6-membered rings, indenoindoles have sparked great interest for the design ofEntities:
Keywords: cytotoxicity; indeno[1,2-b]indoles; inhibitory activity; molecular modeling; protein kinase CK2; synthesis
Year: 2015 PMID: 26061121 PMCID: PMC4491662 DOI: 10.3390/ph8020279
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceuticals (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8247
Figure 1Examples of known CK2 inhibitors.
Figure 2Scaffolds for designing CK2 inhibitors and D-ring modulation on indeno[1,2-b]indoledione.
Scheme 1Synthesis of dihydroxyindeno[1,2-b]indole derivatives 4a–g.
Figure 3Structure of the ammonium salt 4d’.
Figure 4Crystal structure of 4d’ with our numbering scheme; displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level. Drawing was performed using the OLEX2 graphical interface [21].
Scheme 2Synthesis of indeno[1,2-b]indole derivatives 5a–g, 6a–g and 7a–g.
Figure 5The two most potent CK2 inhibitors 5a and 7a of the novel indeno[1,2-b]indole derivatives.
Figure 6Determination of the inhibition constants for the indeno[1,2-b]indoloquinone 7a. were plotted against the corresponding inhibitor concentrations.
Figure 7(A) Predicted binding mode of 7a in the binding pocket of CK2. Green: hydrophobic surface patches, yellow: hydrophilic surface patches, blue (red): positively (negatively) polarized surface patches. Val53 and Ile174 shown in panel B are hidden behind Gly46. (B) Schematic view of the interactions between 7a and neighboring amino acids (modified from a PoseView drawing [28]).
Synthesized indeno[1,2-b]indole derivatives and inhibition of human CK2 holoenzyme.
| Compound | R1 | R2 | Inhibition (%) 1) | IC50 ± SD (µM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CH3 | H | 94 | 0.17 ± 0.03 | |
| H | 94 | 0.61 ± 0.03 | ||
| C6H5 | H | 7 | n.d. 2) | |
| 4-F-C6H4 | H | 12 | n.d. | |
| 2′-furanyl | H | 35 | n.d. | |
| H | CH3 | 52 | 9.18 ± 0.92 | |
| H | 21 | n.d. | ||
| CH3 | H | 64 | 1.27 ± 0.27 | |
| H | 60 | 1.45 ± 0.32 | ||
| C6H5 | H | 42 | n.d. | |
| 4-F-C6H4 | H | 59 | 2.77 ± 0.35 | |
| 2′-furanyl | H | 65 | 3.63 ± 0.34 | |
| H | CH3 | 45 | n.d. | |
| H | 35 | n.d. | ||
| CH3 | H | 87 | 0.43 ± 0.12 | |
| H | 60 | 4.76 ± 0.29 | ||
| C6H5 | H | 41 | n.d. | |
| 4-F-C6H4 | H | 42 | n.d. | |
| 2′-furanyl | H | 82 | 1.65 ± 0.14 | |
| H | CH3 | 72 | 4.90 ± 0.54 | |
| H | 45 | n.d. | ||
| ellagic acid | - | 95 | 0.040 ± 0.007 | |
| emodin | - | 99 | 0.58 ± 0.05 | |
| TBB | - | - | 99 | 0.060 ± 0.005 |
1) Average percent inhibition at 10 µM. 2) n.d.: not determined.
EC50 values of selected compounds 5–7 and TBB against four cell lines.
| Compound | EC50 in µM ± SD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal cell lines 1) | ||||
| NIH-3T3 | WI-38 | HEK293T | MEF | |
| > 10 | > 10 | > 10 | > 10 | |
| > 10 | > 10 | > 10 | 4.4 ± 0.3 | |
| > 10 | > 10 | > 10 | > 10 | |
| > 10 | > 10 | > 10 | > 10 | |
| > 10 | > 10 | > 10 | > 10 | |
| > 10 | > 10 | > 10 | > 10 | |
| > 10 | > 10 | > 10 | > 10 | |
| > 10 | > 10 | > 10 | > 10 | |
| > 10 | > 10 | > 10 | > 10 | |
| > 10 | > 10 | > 10 | > 10 | |
| > 10 | > 10 | > 10 | > 10 | |
| not soluble | not soluble | not soluble | not soluble | |
| > 10 | > 10 | > 10 | > 10 | |
| > 10 | > 10 | 1.6 ± 0.2 | > 10 | |
| > 10 | > 10 | 4.9 ± 2.4 | 8.5 ± 0.4 | |
| > 10 | > 10 | 4.4 ± 2.2 | > 10 | |
| 1.5 ± 0.8 | 2.5 ± 0.4 | 0.40 ± 0.02 | > 10 | |
| ellagic acid | > 10 | > 10 | > 10 | > 10 |
| emodin | > 10 | > 10 | > 10 | > 10 |
| TBB | > 10 | > 10 | > 10 | > 10 |
1) Cells were cultured in presence of various concentrations of the respective conjugate. After 96 h, cytotoxicity was evaluated using the WST-1 assay; see Experimental Section 3.3.4.