Literature DB >> 26061120

Predictive modelling of habitat selection by marine predators with respect to the abundance and depth distribution of pelagic prey.

Charlotte Boyd1, Ramiro Castillo2, George L Hunt1, André E Punt1, Glenn R VanBlaricom1,3, Henri Weimerskirch4, Sophie Bertrand5.   

Abstract

Understanding the ecological processes that underpin species distribution patterns is a fundamental goal in spatial ecology. However, developing predictive models of habitat use is challenging for species that forage in marine environments, as both predators and prey are often highly mobile and difficult to monitor. Consequently, few studies have developed resource selection functions for marine predators based directly on the abundance and distribution of their prey. We analysed contemporaneous data on the diving locations of two seabird species, the shallow-diving Peruvian Booby (Sula variegata) and deeper diving Guanay Cormorant (Phalacrocorax bougainvilliorum), and the abundance and depth distribution of their main prey, Peruvian anchoveta (Engraulis ringens). Based on this unique data set, we developed resource selection functions to test the hypothesis that the probability of seabird diving behaviour at a given location is a function of the relative abundance of prey in the upper water column. For both species, we show that the probability of diving behaviour is mostly explained by the distribution of prey at shallow depths. While the probability of diving behaviour increases sharply with prey abundance at relatively low levels of abundance, support for including abundance in addition to the depth distribution of prey is weak, suggesting that prey abundance was not a major factor determining the location of diving behaviour during the study period. The study thus highlights the importance of the depth distribution of prey for two species of seabird with different diving capabilities. The results complement previous research that points towards the importance of oceanographic processes that enhance the accessibility of prey to seabirds. The implications are that locations where prey is predictably found at accessible depths may be more important for surface foragers, such as seabirds, than locations where prey is predictably abundant. Analysis of the relative importance of abundance and accessibility is essential for the design and evaluation of effective management responses to reduced prey availability for seabirds and other top predators in marine systems.
© 2015 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2015 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Humboldt Current System; central place foragers; foraging ecology; habitat use; predator-prey interactions; spatial distribution

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26061120     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  8 in total

1.  Recent prey capture experience and dynamic habitat quality mediate short-term foraging site fidelity in a seabird.

Authors:  Gemma Carroll; Robert Harcourt; Benjamin J Pitcher; David Slip; Ian Jonsen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  High sea surface temperatures driven by a strengthening current reduce foraging success by penguins.

Authors:  Gemma Carroll; Jason D Everett; Robert Harcourt; David Slip; Ian Jonsen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Seabird diving behaviour reveals the functional significance of shelf-sea fronts as foraging hotspots.

Authors:  S L Cox; P I Miller; C B Embling; K L Scales; A W J Bicknell; P J Hosegood; G Morgan; S N Ingram; S C Votier
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.963

4.  Taking movement data to new depths: Inferring prey availability and patch profitability from seabird foraging behavior.

Authors:  Marianna Chimienti; Thomas Cornulier; Ellie Owen; Mark Bolton; Ian M Davies; Justin M J Travis; Beth E Scott
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Oceanic thermal structure mediates dive sequences in a foraging seabird.

Authors:  Xavier Meyer; Andrew J J MacIntosh; Andre Chiaradia; Akiko Kato; Francisco Ramírez; Cédric Sueur; Yan Ropert-Coudert
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Localised anthropogenic wake generates a predictable foraging hotspot for top predators.

Authors:  Lilian Lieber; W Alex M Nimmo-Smith; James J Waggitt; Louise Kregting
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2019-04-04

7.  Adélie penguins foraging consistency and site fidelity are conditioned by breeding status and environmental conditions.

Authors:  Candice Michelot; Akiko Kato; Thierry Raclot; Yan Ropert-Coudert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Variability in prey field structure drives inter-annual differences in prey encounter by a marine predator, the little penguin.

Authors:  Lachlan R Phillips; Gemma Carroll; Ian Jonsen; Robert Harcourt; Andrew S Brierley; Adam Wilkins; Martin Cox
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 3.653

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.