IMPORTANCE: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is an important complication of colorectal surgery, but its incidence is unclear in the era of VTE prophylaxis. OBJECTIVE: To describe the incidence of and risk factors associated with thromboembolic complications and contemporary VTE prophylaxis patterns following colorectal surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective data from the Washington State Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program (SCOAP) linked to a statewide hospital discharge database. At 52 Washington State SCOAP hospitals, participants included consecutive patients undergoing colorectal surgery between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2011. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Venous thromboembolism complications in-hospital and up to 90 days after surgery. RESULTS: Among 16,120 patients (mean age, 61.4 years; 54.5% female), the use of perioperative and in-hospital VTE chemoprophylaxis increased significantly from 31.6% to 86.4% and from 59.6% to 91.4%, respectively, by 2011 (P < .001 for trend for both). Overall, 10.6% (1399 of 13,230) were discharged on a chemoprophylaxis regimen. The incidence of VTE was 2.2% (360 of 16,120). Patients undergoing abdominal operations had higher rates of 90-day VTE compared with patients having pelvic operations (2.5% [246 of 9702] vs 1.8% [114 of 6413], P = .001). Those having an operation for cancer had a similar incidence of 90-day VTE compared with those having an operation for nonmalignant processes (2.1% [128 of 6213] vs 2.3% [232 of 9902], P = .24). On adjusted analysis, older age, nonelective surgery, history of VTE, and operations for inflammatory disease were associated with increased risk of 90-day VTE (P < .05 for all). There was no significant decrease in VTE over time. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Venous thromboembolism rates are low and largely unchanged despite increases in perioperative and postoperative prophylaxis. These data should be considered in developing future guidelines.
IMPORTANCE: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is an important complication of colorectal surgery, but its incidence is unclear in the era of VTE prophylaxis. OBJECTIVE: To describe the incidence of and risk factors associated with thromboembolic complications and contemporary VTE prophylaxis patterns following colorectal surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective data from the Washington State Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program (SCOAP) linked to a statewide hospital discharge database. At 52 Washington State SCOAP hospitals, participants included consecutive patients undergoing colorectal surgery between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2011. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Venous thromboembolism complications in-hospital and up to 90 days after surgery. RESULTS: Among 16,120 patients (mean age, 61.4 years; 54.5% female), the use of perioperative and in-hospital VTE chemoprophylaxis increased significantly from 31.6% to 86.4% and from 59.6% to 91.4%, respectively, by 2011 (P < .001 for trend for both). Overall, 10.6% (1399 of 13,230) were discharged on a chemoprophylaxis regimen. The incidence of VTE was 2.2% (360 of 16,120). Patients undergoing abdominal operations had higher rates of 90-day VTE compared with patients having pelvic operations (2.5% [246 of 9702] vs 1.8% [114 of 6413], P = .001). Those having an operation for cancer had a similar incidence of 90-day VTE compared with those having an operation for nonmalignant processes (2.1% [128 of 6213] vs 2.3% [232 of 9902], P = .24). On adjusted analysis, older age, nonelective surgery, history of VTE, and operations for inflammatory disease were associated with increased risk of 90-day VTE (P < .05 for all). There was no significant decrease in VTE over time. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Venous thromboembolism rates are low and largely unchanged despite increases in perioperative and postoperative prophylaxis. These data should be considered in developing future guidelines.
Authors: Giancarlo Agnelli; Giorgio Bolis; Lorenzo Capussotti; Roberto Mario Scarpa; Francesco Tonelli; Erminio Bonizzoni; Marco Moia; Fabio Parazzini; Romina Rossi; Francesco Sonaglia; Bettina Valarani; Carlo Bianchini; Gualberto Gussoni Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: G Simonneau; S Laporte; P Mismetti; A Derlon; K Samii; C-M Samama; J-F Bergman Journal: J Thromb Haemost Date: 2006-06-21 Impact factor: 5.824
Authors: Elliott R Haut; Kathy Noll; David T Efron; Sean M Berenholz; Adil Haider; Edward E Cornwell; Peter J Pronovost Journal: J Trauma Date: 2007-11
Authors: Charles A Pierce; Elliott R Haut; Shahrzad Kardooni; David C Chang; David T Efron; Adil Haider; Peter J Pronovost; Edward E Cornwell Journal: J Trauma Date: 2008-04
Authors: Eliza W Beal; Dmitry Tumin; Jeffery Chakedis; Erica Porter; Dimitrios Moris; Xu-Feng Zhang; Mark Arnold; Alan Harzman; Syed Husain; Carl R Schmidt; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: World J Surg Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: N Alhassan; M Trepanier; C Sabapathy; P Chaudhury; A S Liberman; P Charlebois; B L Stein; L Lee Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2018-12-19 Impact factor: 3.781
Authors: Christopher J Pannucci; Kory I Fleming; Corinne B Bertolaccini; Ann Marie Prazak; Lyen C Huang; T Bartley Pickron Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Peter A Najjar; Arin L Madenci; Cheryl K Zogg; Eric B Schneider; Christian A Dankers; Marc T Pimentel; Amrita S Chabria; Joel E Goldberg; Gaurav Sharma; Gregory Piazza; Ronald Bleday; Dennis P Orgill; Allen Kachalia Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2016-09-28 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Cary Jo R Schlick; Tarik K Yuce; Anthony D Yang; Michael F McGee; David J Bentrem; Karl Y Bilimoria; Ryan P Merkow Journal: Surgery Date: 2020-10-17 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Melissa L Bellomy; Milo C Engoren; Barbara J Martin; Yaping Shi; Matthew S Shotwell; Christopher G Hughes; Robert E Freundlich Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2021-01 Impact factor: 6.627