Literature DB >> 2606081

Percutaneous cholangioscopy for management of retained biliary tract stones and intrahepatic stones.

T Yamakawa1.   

Abstract

Over the last 13 years starting from 1975 when the first improved cholangiofiberscope was developed at the Teikyo University Hospital, 216 patients with retained biliary tract stones and 93 patients with intrahepatic stones have been seen; stone extraction was successful in 210 and 83 cases with percutaneous cholangioscopy, the success rate being 97.2 and 89.4% respectively. In particular, the advent of sophisticated technology for smashing stones, such as electrohydraulic lithotripsy, and cholangiofiberscope instrumentation have certainly helped to improve the therapeutic results in biliary tract stones. Today it can be claimed that visible stones are readily removable with percutaneous cholangioscopy. Moreover, percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy has been proved to be an indispensable tool for the management of intrahepatic stones and benign or malignant biliary tract diseases. Another advantage of percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy is that it may be indicated, even in patients in whom the transduodenal approach is considered too difficult to apply. The author firmly believes that even better therapeutic results can be expected if this endoscopic approach becomes more routine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2606081     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1012984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  8 in total

1.  Intraductal shock-wave lithotripsy in complicated common bile duct stones.

Authors:  J F Riemann; B Kohler; J Weber; D Schlauch
Journal:  Clin Investig       Date:  1992-02

2.  Methods, indications, and results of percutaneous choledochoscopy. A series of 161 procedures.

Authors:  T Ponchon; G Genin; R Mitchell; L Henry; R M Bory; D Bodnar; P J Valette
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Results of percutaneous manoeuvres in biliary disease: the Paul Brousse experience.

Authors:  Denis Castaing; Eric Vibert; Prashant Bhangui; Chady Salloum; Allaoua Smail; René Adam; Daniel Azoulay
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Intrahepatic stones. The transhepatic team approach.

Authors:  H A Pitt; A C Venbrux; J Coleman; C A Prescott; M S Johnson; F A Osterman; J L Cameron
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Clinical comparison of extracorporeal piezoelectric lithotripsy (EPL) and intracorporeal electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) in difficult bile duct stones. A prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  H E Adamek; A Buttmann; R Wessbecher; B Kohler; J F Riemann
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Biliary and pancreatic lithotripsy devices.

Authors:  Rabindra R Watson; Mansour A Parsi; Harry R Aslanian; Adam J Goodman; David R Lichtenstein; Joshua Melson; Udayakumar Navaneethan; Rahul Pannala; Amrita Sethi; Shelby A Sullivan; Nirav C Thosani; Guru Trikudanathan; Arvind J Trindade; John T Maple
Journal:  VideoGIE       Date:  2018-09-26

7.  Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of primary intrahepatic stones.

Authors:  M H Kim; S K Lee; Y I Min; M G Lee; K B Sung; K S Cho; S G Lee; P C Min
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.884

Review 8.  Difficult Biliary Stones: A Comprehensive Review of New and Old Lithotripsy Techniques.

Authors:  Edoardo Troncone; Michelangela Mossa; Pasquale De Vico; Giovanni Monteleone; Giovanna Del Vecchio Blanco
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 2.430

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.