Literature DB >> 2605971

Meta-analysis: science or religion?

C L Meinert1.   

Abstract

Meta-analysis of clinical trials has assumed increasing importance in recent years as a means of reaching conclusions regarding the safety and efficacy of treatments evaluated in individual trials. This article discusses impediments to meta-analyses and enumerates needs that should be satisfied to enhance their usefulness. Key among the needs are improved means of identifying trials prior to publication via prospective registration of them and vocabulary and nomenclature for identifying reports of meta-analyses in the published literature.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2605971     DOI: 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90064-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Control Clin Trials        ISSN: 0197-2456


  5 in total

Review 1.  Meta-analysis of observational epidemiological studies: a review.

Authors:  D R Jones
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Critical writing and reading of review articles.

Authors:  G Maxie
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  Determining gene moderation of environmental risk factors for a mental disorder: a "perfect storm" of methodological problems.

Authors:  Helena Chmura Kraemer
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 4.035

Review 4.  Falling sperm counts and global estrogenic pollution: what have we learned over 20 years?

Authors:  David J Handelsman; Trevor G Cooper
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.285

5.  Meta-analysis of field trials of antimicrobial mass medication for prophylaxis of bovine respiratory disease in feedlot cattle.

Authors:  J Van Donkersgoed
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.008

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.