Yen Lee Angela Kwok1, Michelle Callard2, Mary-Louise McLaws3. 1. School of Public Health and Community Medicine, UNSW Medicine, UNSW Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 2. Infection Prevention and Control Unit, Campbelltown and Camden Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. 3. School of Public Health and Community Medicine, UNSW Medicine, UNSW Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. Electronic address: m.mclaws@unsw.edu.au.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The hand hygiene technique that the World Health Organization recommends for cleansing hands with soap and water or alcohol-based handrub consists of 7 poses. We used an automated training system to improve clinicians' hand hygiene technique and test whether this affected hospitalwide hand hygiene compliance. METHODS: Seven hundred eighty-nine medical and nursing staff volunteered to participate in a self-directed training session using the automated training system. The proportion of successful first attempts was reported for each of the 7 poses. Hand hygiene compliance was collected according to the national requirement and rates for 2011-2014 were used to determine the effect of the training system on compliance. RESULTS: The highest pass rate was for pose 1 (palm to palm) at 77% (606 out of 789), whereas pose 6 (clean thumbs) had the lowest pass rate at 27% (216 out of 789). One hundred volunteers provided feedback to 8 items related to satisfaction with the automated training system and most (86%) expressed a high degree of satisfaction and all reported that this method was time-efficient. There was no significant change in compliance rates after the introduction of the automated training system. Observed compliance during the posttraining period declined but increased to 82% in response to other strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Technology for training clinicians in the 7 poses played an important education role but did not affect compliance rates. Crown
INTRODUCTION: The hand hygiene technique that the World Health Organization recommends for cleansing hands with soap and water or alcohol-based handrub consists of 7 poses. We used an automated training system to improve clinicians' hand hygiene technique and test whether this affected hospitalwide hand hygiene compliance. METHODS: Seven hundred eighty-nine medical and nursing staff volunteered to participate in a self-directed training session using the automated training system. The proportion of successful first attempts was reported for each of the 7 poses. Hand hygiene compliance was collected according to the national requirement and rates for 2011-2014 were used to determine the effect of the training system on compliance. RESULTS: The highest pass rate was for pose 1 (palm to palm) at 77% (606 out of 789), whereas pose 6 (clean thumbs) had the lowest pass rate at 27% (216 out of 789). One hundred volunteers provided feedback to 8 items related to satisfaction with the automated training system and most (86%) expressed a high degree of satisfaction and all reported that this method was time-efficient. There was no significant change in compliance rates after the introduction of the automated training system. Observed compliance during the posttraining period declined but increased to 82% in response to other strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Technology for training clinicians in the 7 poses played an important education role but did not affect compliance rates. Crown