Literature DB >> 26059201

Size does matter! Perceptual stimulus properties affect event-related potentials during feedback processing.

Daniela M Pfabigan1, Uta Sailer2, Claus Lamm1.   

Abstract

The current study investigated whether or not the physical aspect of stimulus size has an effect on neuronal correlates of feedback processing. A time estimation task was administered applying three different feedback stimulus categories: small, middle, and large size stimuli. Apart from early visual ERPs such as P1 and N1 components, later feedback processing stages were also affected by the size of feedback stimuli. In particular, small size stimuli compared to middle and large size ones led to diminished amplitudes in both FRN and P300 components, despite intact discrimination between negative and positive outcomes in these two ERPs. In contrast, time estimation performance was not influenced by feedback size. The current results indicate that small size feedback stimuli were perceived as less salient and hence were processed less deeply than the others. This suggests that future feedback studies could manipulate feedback salience simply by presenting differently sized feedback stimuli, at least when the focus lies on FRN and P300 amplitude variation.
© 2015 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Keywords:  Early visual ERPs; FRN; P300; Perceptual salience; Stimulus size

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26059201     DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  8 in total

1.  Converging electrophysiological evidence for a processing advantage of social over nonsocial feedback.

Authors:  Daniela M Pfabigan; Shihui Han
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Coercive and legitimate authority impact tax honesty: evidence from behavioral and ERP experiments.

Authors:  Katharina Gangl; Daniela M Pfabigan; Claus Lamm; Erich Kirchler; Eva Hofmann
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Cultural influences on the processing of social comparison feedback signals-an ERP study.

Authors:  Daniela M Pfabigan; Anna M Wucherer; Xuena Wang; Xinyue Pan; Claus Lamm; Shihui Han
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Monetary Incentives Modulate Feedback-related Brain Activity.

Authors:  Shuting Mei; Qi Li; Xun Liu; Ya Zheng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Social distance modulates the process of uncertain decision-making: evidence from event-related potentials.

Authors:  Huan Guo; Hang Song; Yuanyuan Liu; Kai Xu; Heyong Shen
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2019-08-21

6.  Electrophysiological Correlates of Emotional Content and Volume Level in Spoken Word Processing.

Authors:  Annika Grass; Mareike Bayer; Annekathrin Schacht
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Visual awareness negativity is an early neural correlate of awareness: A preregistered study with two Gabor sizes.

Authors:  Rasmus Eklund; Stefan Wiens
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Internal control beliefs and reference frame concurrently impact early performance monitoring ERPs.

Authors:  Daniela M Pfabigan; Anna M Wucherer; Claus Lamm
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.282

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.